ORDER LIST

TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

92-217 AM. COUNCIL OF BLIND, ET AL. V. ROMER, GOV. OF CO, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for

further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506

U. S. (1992).

92-292 KOLODZIECZAK, RONALD, ET AL. V. FRIEND, JACK WAYNE, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for

further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506

U. S. (1993).

92-402 NICHOLS, ROBERT, ET AL. V. ROMBERG, MICHAEL, ET UX.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for

further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506

U. S. (1993).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

D-1188 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH A. LOMBARDI

It having been reported to the Court that Joseph A.

Lombardi, of Scituate, Massachusetts, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court

of Massachusetts and this Court by order of October 19,

1992, having suspended the said Joseph A. Lombardi from

the practice of law in this Court and directed that a

rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not

be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Joseph A. Lombardi be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1189 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL G. HURLEY

It having been reported to the Court that Daniel G.

Hurley, of Medford, Massachusetts, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court

of Massachusetts and this Court by order of October 19,

1992, having suspended the said Daniel G. Hurley from

the practice of law in this Court and directed that a

rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not

be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Daniel G. Hurley be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1190 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD SY COLE

It having been reported to the Court that Howard Sy

Cole, of Van Nuys, California, has resigned from the

practice of law before the Supreme Court of California

and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having

suspended the said Howard Sy Cole from the practice of

law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Howard Sy Cole be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1191 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS J. SKRYD

It having been reported to the Court that Thomas J.

Skryd, of Cicero, Illinois, has been disbarred from the

practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and

this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having

suspended the said Thomas J. Skryd from the practice of

law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Thomas J. Skryd be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1192 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BENNETT ALBAN

It having been reported to the Court that Bennett

Alban, of Chicago, Illinois, has been disbarred from the

practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and

this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having

suspended the said Bennett Alban from the practice of

law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Bennett Alban be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1194 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WALTER HARRY CAPLAN

It having been reported to the Court that Walter

Harry Caplan, of San Francisco, California, has been

disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court

of California and this Court by order of November 2,

1992, having suspended the said Walter Harry Caplan from

the practice of law in this Court and directed that a

rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not

be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Walter Harry Caplan be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1195 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD J. CASPER

It having been reported to the Court that Howard J.

Casper, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has been

disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court

of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by

order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the said

Howard J. Casper from the practice of law in this Court

and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show

cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Howard J. Casper be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1196 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES IRVING HARLAN

It having been reported to the Court that James

Irving Harlan, of Dallas, Texas, has been suspended from

the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and

this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having

suspended the said James Irving Harlan from the practice

of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said James Irving Harlan be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1197 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF J. DARE HAWKINS

It having been reported to the Court that J. Dare

Hawkins, of Houston, Texas, has been disbarred from the

practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this

Court by order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the

said J. Dare Hawkins from the practice of law in this

Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to

show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said J. Dare Hawkins be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1198 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF IRA WATROUS

It having been reported to the Court that Ira

Watrous, of Houston, Texas, has been disbarred from the

practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this

Court by order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the

said Ira Watrous from the practice of law in this Court

and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show

cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Ira Watrous be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1200 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DENNIS J. SIMON

It having been reported to the Court that Dennis J.

Simon, of Coral Springs, Florida, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of

Maryland and this Court by order of November 2, 1992,

having suspended the said Dennis J. Simon from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Dennis J. Simon be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1201 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF REGINALD L. NORRIS

It having been reported to the Court that Reginald

L. Norris, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of

Michigan and this Court by order of November 9, 1992,

having suspended the said Reginald L. Norris from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Reginald L. Norris be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1207 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED I. ZABRISKIE

It having been reported to the Court that Fred I.

Zabriskie, of Larchmont, New York, has resigned from the

practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme

Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this

Court by order of November 16, 1992, having suspended the

said Fred I. Zabriskie from the practice of law in this

Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to

show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Fred I. Zabriskie be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1225 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES L. GLADSON

It is ordered that Charles L. Gladson, of

Washington, D. C., be suspended from the practice of law

in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-1226 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS L. WADDELL

It is ordered that Thomas L. Waddell, of San Diego,

California, be suspended from the practice of law in

this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-1227 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES W. ANSHEN

It is ordered that Charles W. Anshen, of Encino,

California, be suspended from the practice of law in

this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

111 ORIG. DELAWARE V. NEW YORK

The motion of New York for leave to file first amended

answers and leave to file counterclaim is denied without

prejudice to renewal following the issuance of the opinion

of this Court on the Report of the Special Master.

91-2054 U. S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE V. LANDANO, VINCENT

The motion of respondent to supplement the record

is granted.

92-207 UNITED STATES V. PADILLA, XAVIER, ET AL.

The motion of respondent Maria Simpson for leave to

proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The

motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is

ordered that David A. Bono, Esquire, of Washington, D.

C., is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondents

Donald Simpson, et al. in this case.

92-780 NOW, INC., ET AL. V. SCHEIDLER, JOSEPH, ET AL.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief

in this case limited to Question 1 presented by the

petition for a writ of certiorari expressing the views

of the United States.

92-854 CENTRAL BANK OF DENVER V. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK, ET AL.

92-913 BANCO ESPANOL, ETC., ET AL. V. SECURITY PACIFIC, ET AL.

The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in

these cases expressing the views of the United States.

92-910 STOWE, MARY SUE DAVIS V. DAVIS, JUNIOR, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner to expedite consideration

of the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

92-6027 SMITH, CARLTON V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GEN.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until

February 9, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in

compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For

the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464

U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ

of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion

to proceed in forma pauperis.

92-6449 DAVIS, DOROTHY L. V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until

February 9, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in

compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed

in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I

would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without

reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma

pauperis.

CERTIORARI DENIED

91-1794 WALKER, ANN V. ANDERSON ELECTRICAL

92-612 MACKIN, LAWRENCE, ET AL. V. BOSTON, ET AL.

92-663 BD. OF TRUSTEES KNOX COUNTY V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS

92-699 FISHER, DANNY V. UNITED STATES

92-706 YAMAHA CORP. OF AM. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

92-707 DUFFY, PETER, ET AL. V. FDIC, ET AL.

92-717 SISSLER, JOSEPH EMILE V. UNITED STATES

92-751 SNOHOMISH CTY., ET AL. V. LUTHERAN DAY CARE

92-752 VARAH, A. V. UNITED STATES

92-755 FIRST NATL. LIFE INS. V. SUNSHINE-JR. FOOD STORES

92-796 ODOM, WILLIAM V. LEWIS, GEORGE T., ET AL.

92-816 D.R., ET AL. V. MIDDLE BUCKS TECH., ET AL.

92-841 EL MONTE, CA V. RHODES, OTHA T.

92-850 TEAGUE, JOSEPH, ET AL. V. EMPLOYERS REINS. ET AL.

92-853 SANDERS CONFECTION., ET AL. V. HELLER FINANCIAL, ET AL.

92-857 DILLARD, CARVEL V. SECURITY PACIFIC, ET AL.

92-858 McLEOD, WILLIAM V. McLEOD, FUMIKO I.

92-861 RIDER, ROBIN V. ALABAMA

92-862 SMITH, EDWARD V. DEPT. OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEV.

92-863 FRITO-LAY, INC., ET AL. V. WAITS, TOM

92-865 O'BRIEN, CHARLES W. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A.

92-866 O'BRIEN, CHARLES W. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A.

92-873 ) ALLSTATE INS. CO. V. MALESKI, ACT. INS. COMMR. OF PA

)

92-937 ) RHINE REINS. CO., ET AL. V. MUTUAL FIRE, MARINE, ET AL.

92-874 SIEMER, WENCHE, ET AL. V. LEARJET ACQUISITION CORP.

92-875 HONEYCUTT, DIANE, ET AL. V. NORBECK, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

92-876 MACIARIELLO, ROBERT, ET AL. V. LANCASTER, ET AL.

92-878 AMERINET, INC., ET AL. V. XEROX CORP.

92-880 MIDBOE, KAI V. CHEM. WASTE MGMT., INC.

92-881 MAXA, JAMES V. JOHN ALDEN LIFE INS. CO.

92-882 ELUL REALTY CORP. V. GREYHOUND EXHIBITGROUP, INC.

92-884 MOORE, MONICA V. GWINNETT CTY., ET AL.

92-885 ROBERTS, JAY, ETC., ET AL. V. MUTSKO, JOHN, ET AL.

92-886 AZUL PACIFICO, INC. V. LOS ANGELES, CA

92-887 BERGER, SANFORD, ET AL. V. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSN.

92-890 GUINN, LESLIE V. TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIV., ET AL.

92-894 TINSLEY, LARRY V. KUHLMANN, WARDEN

92-898 JATOI, ALIMADAD, ET UX. V. AETNA INSURANCE CO., ET AL.

92-899 SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL. V. STONE, WILL, ET AL.

92-904 McCOY, CHARLES, ET AL. V. SEAWARD MARINE SERV., INC.

92-905 MAYFLOWER INTL., ET AL. V. PAUAHI ASSOCIATES

92-923 GALLAGHER, STEPHEN, ET AL. V. IN ST. ELECTION BD., ET AL.

92-930 QUIGLEY, ROBERT V. FLORIDA

92-953 COLEMAN, JOANNE V. NATIONWIDE LIFE INS. CO.

92-962 POLYAK, EARLENE V. CIR

92-975 GIBSON, THELMA V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS

92-976 LYNCH, JOHN THOMAS V. UNITED STATES

92-979 NAKELL, BARRY, ET AL. V. BRITT, JOE, ET AL.

92-986 BUCK, PITMAN, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

92-987 BASHA, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

92-1020 DOWDY, GILBERT V. UNITED STATES

92-5822 HOLLAND, DANIEL V. McGINNIS, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-5897 JOHNSON, WALLACE V. UNITED STATES

92-5925 FELDMAN, ROBERT I. V. UNITED STATES

92-5950 JOHNSON, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES

92-5954 ) HILL, LEON V. UNITED STATES

)

92-6182 ) AMUNDSEN, EVA L. V. UNITED STATES

)

92-6386 ) HILL, WAYNE G. V. UNITED STATES

)

92-6532 ) AMUNDSEN, HYRUM J. V. UNITED STATES

92-6001 SMITH, STEVEN V. OPM

92-6007 EASLEY, IKE J. V. ILLINOIS

92-6044 GANUS, VICTOR L. V. ILLINOIS

92-6062 COFFELT, HERSCHEL L. V. UNITED STATES

92-6095 HILL, ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES

92-6111 GENTRY, KENNETH V. TEXAS

92-6132 DRISCOLL, RONALD V. UNITED STATES

92-6187 KLEINSCHMIDT, WILLIAM E. V. U.S. FIDELITY, ET AL.

92-6236 SKIDMORE, ROCKY DANIEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6256 McFARLAND, WALLACE V. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., ET AL.

92-6274 LEE, KYE SOO V. UNITED STATES

92-6335 CAULEY, JOHN WILLIE V. UNITED STATES

92-6343 WILLMSCHEN, GLENN E. V. UNITED STATES

92-6347 MARTINEZ, JOHN V. V. UNITED STATES

92-6371 OBI, HARRY NDUBISI V. UNITED STATES

92-6392 BARSKI, STANLEY FRANK V. UNITED STATES

92-6415 ROZO, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES

92-6464 BERKOWITZ, MARVIN V. UNITED STATES

92-6534 MARTIN, KEITH V. UNITED STATES

92-6603 ATWOOD, FRANK JARVIS V. ARIZONA

92-6636 YOUNGS, BARBARA S. V. TEXAS DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS

92-6648 FARRELL, CHARLES V. McDONOUGH, LAWRENCE

92-6654 YORDAN, LUIS V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC

92-6656 BALLARD, JAMES A. V. PASKETT, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-6662 SUDARSKY, PETER V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.

92-6671 MEYERS, JANINA LOUISE V. CALIFORNIA

92-6675 ROBERTS, JOAN V. WEST. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, ET AL.

92-6677 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. ALFRED HUGHES UNIT, ET AL.

92-6680 BRUNS, KEITH WAYNE V. THALACKER, WARDEN

92-6682 BROWN, LARRY V. KELLY, SUPT., ATTICA

92-6691 BARKSDALE-CONTRERAS, TOMAS V. UNITED STATES

92-6695 WHITEHEAD, DAVID V. JENIFER, FRANKLYN

92-6696 TAYLOR, JOSEPH V. CITY OF NEW ALBANY, ET AL.

92-6707 BROKENBROUGH, JOHN H. V. REDMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-6708 WARD, JAMES RAY V. GEORGIA

92-6712 JONES, RICKY L. V. WRIGHT, WARDEN

92-6713 HAYS, LEE M. V. IDAHO

92-6717 DIGGS, DEMETRIUS V. UNITED STATES

92-6731 HUFF, OSCAR V. WILCOX COUNTY ADMINR., ET AL.

92-6734 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. SMITH, AUDREY L., ET AL.

92-6736 CROCKETT, DONALD C. V. DUTTON, WARDEN

92-6740 CURIALE, JOSEPH, ET UX. V. HICKEL, GOV. OF AK, ET AL.

92-6751 COUSINO, PAUL W. V. REKUCKI, LORALEE, ET AL.

92-6757 MANN, LARRY EUGENE V. FLORIDA

92-6771 MARTINEZ, PETER PAUL V. COLORADO

92-6815 SASSER, HIRAM STANLEY V. UNITED STATES

92-6837 BRECHEEN, ROBERT A. V. OKLAHOMA

92-6847 BUCHANAN, HOSIE J. V. UNITED STATES

92-6850 ARMSTRONG, HUCKLEY V. UNITED STATES

92-6853 SIERS, DARWIN V. UNITED STATES

92-6854 DANIELS, JAMES V. UNITED STATES

92-6877 CLARKE, BARRINGTON V. UNITED STATES

92-6880 CAGE, FOLEY LAWRENCE V. UNITED STATES

92-6888 PLEASANT, EDDIE LOUIS V. UNITED STATES

92-6890 BEGLEN, WILLIAM V. UNTIED STATES

92-6894 HOOKER, ALGERNON A. V. UNITED STATES

92-6895 KIMMONS, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES

92-6899 COLEMAN, TROY T. V. UNITED STATES

92-6945 CARDINE, STANLEY MOSE V. KENTUCKY

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

92-597 1975 SALARIED RETIRE., ET AL. V. NOBERS, DAVID, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.

92-728 TWIN CITY FIRE INS., ET AL. V. FORTUNATO, SAMUEL, ETC.

The motion of Connecticut Business & Industry

Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae

is granted. The motion of Institute for Justice, et al.

for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

92-868 REPUBLIC INS. GROUP, ET AL. V. MALESKI, ACT. INS. COMMR. PA

The motion of Reinsurance Association of America

for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

92-908 CAPLINGER, MIKE, ET AL. V. DOE, JANE

The motion of National School Boards Assn., et al.

for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

92-951 GOINS, N. WALTER V. LANG, DALE, ET AL.

The motion of respondents Syndicated

Communications, Inc., et al. for award of double costs

and attorneys' fees is denied. The petition for a writ

of certiorari is denied.

92-1008 SUPPLE, JEROME, ET AL. V. HAYS CTY. GUARDIAN, ET AL.

The motion of American Council on Education for

leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The

petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

92-6287 HIRSCHFELD, RICHARD M. V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner to strike brief in

opposition is denied. The application for bail addressed

to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

92-6957 IN RE PARIS VALENTINE

92-7026 IN RE JACK E. FLEMING

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are

denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED

92-6681 IN RE JULES SMITH

92-6694 IN RE GLENN SPRADLEY

92-6716 IN RE FREDERICK W. BAUER

92-6816 IN RE EDWARD STARLING

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

91-719 PARKE, WARDEN V. RALEY, RICKY

91-6646 HADLEY, VERL V. UNITED STATES

91-8060 ABELLO-SILVA, JOSE R. V. UNITED STATES

92-5642 IN RE FREDERICK W. BAUER

92-5857 FLANAGAN, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES

92-5974 VEGA, MARTIN S. V. TEXAS

92-5997 ZIEBARTH, SYLVESTER V. FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL

92-6179 IN RE HENRY SANDERS

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from Monday, January

25, 1993 until Monday, February 22, 1993.

MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION

The written motions for admission of the following

lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: