WPCf 2BPZCourier 10cpi#|x=Px6X@8QX@HP LaserJetHPLASERJ.PRSx  @PX06{X@22 ZBX#|xHP LaserJetHPLASERJ.PRSx  @PX06{X@?xxx,=Px6X@8QX@?xxx,x `?]X?xxx,%x6NhL]XH!@ Xx]R,,x@*2>&F`dCourier 10cpiCourier 10cpi Bold (H)Courier 10cpi Italic (H) ?      X  ORDER LIST MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1992 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 91-1328 CITY OF CHICAGO, ET AL. V. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the memorandum of The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, dated September 18, 1992, regarding Exemption for Municipal Waste Combustion Ash From Hazardous Waste Regulation Under RCRA Section 3001(i).  ?P  ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No.  . DONALD FLYNN V. MICHIGAN, ET AL. The motion to direct the Clerk to file a complaint is denied. 65 ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO. The motion of the River Master for award of compensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded $8,082.13 for the period July 1 September 30, 1992, to be paid equally by the parties. D-1150 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONALD E. DEUTSCH It having been reported to the Court that Ronald E. Deutsch, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, has resigned from the'0*((Ԍ practice of law before the Supreme Court of Texas and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said Ronald E. Deutsch from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Ronald E. Deutsch be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1153 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT L. KIRKMAN It having been reported to the Court that Robert L. Kirkman, of Portland, Oregon, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Oregon and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said Robert L. Kirkman from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Robert L. Kirkman be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys '0*((Ԍ admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1155 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SEGUNDO UNPINGCO It having been reported to the Court that Segundo Unpingco, of San Jose, California, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of California and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said Segundo Unpingco from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Segundo Unpingco be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1159 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS GEORGE BRODO It having been reported to the Court that Thomas George Brodo, of Wayne, New Jersey, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said Thomas George Brodo from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued '0*((Ԍ and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Thomas George Brodo be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1163 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID R. KNOLL It having been reported to the Court that David R. Knoll, of Buffalo, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said David R. Knoll from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said David R. Knoll be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1206 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CALVIN W. BREIT It is ordered that Calvin W. Breit, of Virginia Beach, Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within '0*((Ԍ forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1207 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED I. ZABRISKIE It is ordered that Fred I. Zabriskie, of Larchmont, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 91-8258 MARTIN, JAMES L. V. DELAWARE 91-8729 DEMPSEY, JOHN B. V. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., ET AL. 92-5068 MARTIN, JAMES L. V. SPARKS, GILCHRIST, ET AL. The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of  ?  orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. 92-479 TXO PRODUCTION CORP. V. ALLIANCE RESOURCES, ET AL. The motion of American Petroleum Institute, et al.  ?  for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of West Virginia Chamber of Commerce for  ?   leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. 92-5938 IN RE FRED WHITAKER  ?@  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis is denied. Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until December 7, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny '0*((Ԍ the petition for a writ of prohibition. 92-6036 FORD, MASON V. UNITED STATES  ?   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 7, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed  ?  in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without  ?  reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma  ?0  pauperis.  ?  CERTIORARI GRANTED 92-466 BROOKE GROUP LTD. V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO 92-551 KEMP, SEC. OF HUD, ET AL. V. ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. 92531 HATCHER, KIM A. V. ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.  ?@  CERTIORARI DENIED 91-1872 FEIST PUB., INC. V. RURAL TELEPHONE SERV. 91-1885 WILSON, PETE, ET AL. V. DEL MONTE, CHARLES, ET AL. 91-8574 HARRIS, VINCENT D. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 91-8725 BELL, JAMES H. V. BAKER, WARDEN 91-8745 ESPELITA, GREGONIA M. V. DERWINSKI, SEC. OF VA'0*((Ԍ 92-30 ZYCH, HARRY, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS HISTORIC PRESERV. 92-211 OKLAHOMA, COMMR. LAND OFFICE V. CROOK, RANDY L., ET AL. 92-338 COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY V. NLRB 92-384 CASH, ROBERT L., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-518 DOUGHTY, MARVIS V. ZOECON CORP. 92-524 CRAM, LILLIAM V. MAXWELL, HUGH, ETC. 92-535 O'BRIEN, CHARLES, ET AL. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A. 92-536 DURHAM, HARVEY V. CORUM, ALVIS 92-538 PELFRESNE, DONALD V. WILLIAMS BAY, ET AL. 92-540 LABOR UNION OF PICO, ET AL. V. PICO PROD., INC., ET AL. 92-546 WASHINGTON WATER POWER CO. V. SPOKANE INDIAN TRIBE 92-549 ATER, DON V. ARMSTRONG, DAVID, ET AL. 92-550 SAARI, HOWARD E. V. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS, ETC. 92-553 KAHN, PHYLLIS, ET AL. V. KOHLBERG, KRAVIS, ET AL. 92-559 DUVAL COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL. V. PEREZ, ANTONIA, ET AL. 92-570 SHARPTON, ALFRED C. V. TURNER, JUDGE, ET AL. 92-599 LINARES, ZOILO, ET AL. V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT. CLINTON 92-618 McCANN, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. CHICAGO 92-619 PATRICK, GEORGE EDWARD V. UNITED STATES 92-661 ROSS, SPECK ARON V. UNITED STATES 92-667 TENAX CORP., ET AL. V. TENSAR CORPORATION 92-5015 COOGAN, CHARLES C. V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN 92-5199 BITTENBENDER, CARLTON L. V. TAYLOR, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-5256 AGUIRRE, ARNOLDO V. UNITED STATES 92-5376 CALIA, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATES 92-5384 CARVER, EDWARD V. CARVER, PAULETTE ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 92-5392 KIRSCH, KEVIN E. V. WISCONSIN 92-5526 PHILLIPS, DARNELL V. UNITED STATES 92-5613 CARLINI, ANGELA A. V. UNITED STATES 92-5636 VIVES, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 92-5654 HALL, MELVIN H. V. UNITED STATES 92-5658 RAY, SHERILYN Y. V. UNITED STATES 92-5672 KASSIM, ZAID V. UNITED STATES 92-5847 HARDY, JAMES V. CALIFORNIA 92-5867 BROWN, BENNY M. V. UNITED STATES 92-5876 EARLE, ALLEN V. UNITED STATES 92-5920 DESMOND, JOHN F. V. CITY OF QUINCY, MA, ET AL. 92-5921 CATELL, MICHAEL J. V. SMYTHE, ADMIN., HALAWA CORR. 92-5922 TRUNDY, EUGENE V. MAGNUSSON, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-5923 BIGGS, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. LYNAUGH, EXEC. DIR., TX DCJ 92-5933 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5934 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. HUGHES UNIT, TX, DCJ, ET AL. 92-5935 WRIGHT, MELVIN V. KEANE, SUPT., SING SING 92-5946 BAUTISTA, ANTONIO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-5953 BOBO, THOMAS J. V. CONLIN, NANCY E., ET AL. 92-5958 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. SAXTON, SAMUEL, ET AL. 92-5963 BOOTH, JOHN V. MARYLAND 92-5974 VEGA, MARTIN S. V. TEXAS 92-5997 ZIEBARTH, SYLVESTER V. FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL 92-6018 BUCHANAN, DOUGLAS McA. V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC, ET AL. 92-6020 SMITH, WILLIAM S. V. ALAMEDA CTY. SHERIFF, ET AL. 92-6042 RIDER, LAWRENCE E. V. DEEDS, WARDEN '0*((Ԍ 92-6067 AVANA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES 92-6078 SCHOOLEY, LONNIE EUGENE V. SOWDERS, WARDEN 92-6096 ) EVANS, BRUCE K. V. UNITED STATES ) 92-6208 ) EVANS, JACK V. UNITED STATES 92-6119 SPEARS, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES 92-6156 KERNICK, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES 92-6175 ROBLEDO, GUSTAVO V. UNITED STATES 92-6183 ) HOLLEY, GERALDINE S. V. UNITED STATES ) 92-6250 ) HATLEY, CHARLES A. V. UNITED STATES 92-6188 PETE, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES 92-6190 MARTIN, WILSON V. UNITED STATES 92-6191 WOFFORD, RACHEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6194 CABEZAS-COLON, LUIS H. V. UNITED STATES 92-6195 LOPEZ-ALVAREZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES 92-6199 CUNNINGHAM, G. HAZEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6201 GARIBAY-BRAVO, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES 92-6205 GREGORY, EARL V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC 92-6207 JOHNSON, RAYMOND V. UNITED STATES 92-6211 MENDEZ, RAPHAEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6212 QUIROZ, SAMUEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6213 LEVINSON, MELVIN E. V. UNITED STATES 92-6221 GARZA, JOSEPH H. V. UNITED STATES 92-6222 BAUTISTA, RAFAEL CASTILLO V. UNITED STATES 92-6223 ALZATE, MIGUEL ANGEL V. UNITED STATES 92-6225 ARIGBEDE, OLAKUNLE LANRE V. UNITED STATES 92-6226 SAVOY, ROBERT DION V. UNITED STATES ' 0*((Ԍ 92-6227 CASEY, JAMES ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6228 SABB, LINWARD V. UNITED STATES 92-6237 SALLY, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-6241 WALKER, LARRY V. UNITED STATES 92-6245 MONTOYA, EDGAR V. UNITED STATES 92-6251 HOLGUIN, CARLOS O. V. UNITED STATES 92-6254 RILEY, CHARLES N. V. UNITED STATES 92-6257 CARTER, ROBERT JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 92-6263 SONSHINE, GLENN HOWARD V. UNITED STATES 92-6268 STRICKLAND, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES 92-6269 WEAVER, PRISCILLA V. UNITED STATES 92-6270 ABATE, TESHOME V. GOLDSMITH, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-6272 TROUTMAN, LATROY V. UNITED STATES 92-6273 SASSI, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES 92-6275 MICKENS, ERIC ELIJAH V. UNITED STATES 92-6279 HUNTER, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES 92-6283 FRIEDMAN, BARRY M. V. UNITED STATES 92-6284 KWASNY, ROBERT M. V. UNITED STATES 92-6286 BYRD, WAYNE M. V. UNITED STATES 92-6295 LUERA, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES 92-6300 EVANS, RANDALL P. V. UNITED STATES 92-6301 HENNINGHAM, GLENN V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 92-111 DIXON, GARY, ET AL. V. WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS  ?%  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  ?'  forma pauperis is granted. The motion of Criminal ' 0*((Ԍ Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as  ?  amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 92-530 GEORGE BASCH CO. V. BLUE CORAL, INC., ET AL. 92-533 ADAMS, NICOLE, ETC., ET AL. V. CHILDREN'S MERCY, ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. 92-532 ARIZONA V. BARTLETT, JOSEPH  ?  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 92-5270 DICKERSON, BERNARD V. RYAN, SUPT., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.  ?p  REHEARINGS DENIED 91-1891 KING, ELINOR S. V. JAMES, L. FOSTER, ET AL. 91-7872 MUHAMMAD, ABDUL-JABBAR V. UNITED STATES 91-7975 IN RE JACK D. LIFFITON 91-8266 LYLE, ROGER L. V. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORR. 91-8414 BROWN, CARSON L. V. BROWN, ROBERT, ET AL. 91-8545 SUEING, JEROME V. BROWN, DIR., MICHIGAN DOC. 91-8699 CLAUSEN, PETER T. V. ANNICH, RUSSELL W., ET AL. 92-45 STONEHILL, HARRY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 92-113 RAMIREZ, MARIA G. V. TEXAS 92-364 PLEMONS, JOHN V. UNITED STATES' 0*((Ԍ 92-5034 IN RE NEWTON C. ESTES 92-5204 YATES, MACK B. V. GARNER, JACK, ET AL. 92-5388 WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS LOUIS V. UNITED STATES 92-5465 MANWANI, RAM P. V. SCHONZEIT, ET AL. 92-5466 MULAZIM, FA'DEE V. REDMAN, WARDEN 92-5591 TAYLOR, ROOSEVELT V. BARBER, EDNA, ET AL. The petitions for rehearing are denied. 92-353 GAMBOCZ, BILL J. V. McCALLUM, CAROLINE, ET AL. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed  ?  further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for rehearing is denied. 92-5556 OMOIKE, ISAAC I. V. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.  ?  MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: