ORDER LIST

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1992

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

91-1328 CITY OF CHICAGO, ET AL. V. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

for further consideration in light of the memorandum of

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection

Agency, dated September 18, 1992, regarding Exemption

for Municipal Waste Combustion Ash From Hazardous Waste

Regulation Under RCRA Section 3001(i).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

No. . DONALD FLYNN V. MICHIGAN, ET AL.

The motion to direct the Clerk to file a complaint

is denied.

65 ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO.

The motion of the River Master for award of

compensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted

and the River Master is awarded $8,082.13 for the

period July 1 - September 30, 1992, to be paid equally

by the parties.

D-1150 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONALD E. DEUTSCH

It having been reported to the Court that Ronald E.

Deutsch, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, has resigned from the

practice of law before the Supreme Court of Texas and

this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having

suspended the said Ronald E. Deutsch from the practice

of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Ronald E. Deutsch be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1153 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT L. KIRKMAN

It having been reported to the Court that Robert L.

Kirkman, of Portland, Oregon, has been disbarred from

the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Oregon and

this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having

suspended the said Robert L. Kirkman from the practice

of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Robert L. Kirkman be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1155 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SEGUNDO UNPINGCO

It having been reported to the Court that Segundo

Unpingco, of San Jose, California, has resigned from the

practice of law before the Supreme Court of California

and this Court by order of September 4, 1992, having

suspended the said Segundo Unpingco from the practice of

law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly

issued;

It is ordered that the said Segundo Unpingco be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1159 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS GEORGE BRODO

It having been reported to the Court that Thomas

George Brodo, of Wayne, New Jersey, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New

Jersey and this Court by order of September 4, 1992,

having suspended the said Thomas George Brodo from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Thomas George Brodo be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1163 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID R. KNOLL

It having been reported to the Court that David R.

Knoll, of Buffalo, New York, has been disbarred from the

practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court

of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, and this Court

by order of September 4, 1992, having suspended the said

David R. Knoll from the practice of law in this Court

and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show

cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said David R. Knoll be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1206 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CALVIN W. BREIT

It is ordered that Calvin W. Breit, of Virginia

Beach, Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law

in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-1207 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED I. ZABRISKIE

It is ordered that Fred I. Zabriskie, of Larchmont,

New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this

Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty

days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

91-8258 MARTIN, JAMES L. V. DELAWARE

91-8729 DEMPSEY, JOHN B. V. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., ET AL.

92-5068 MARTIN, JAMES L. V. SPARKS, GILCHRIST, ET AL.

The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of

orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are

denied.

92-479 TXO PRODUCTION CORP. V. ALLIANCE RESOURCES, ET AL.

The motion of American Petroleum Institute, et al.

for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.

The motion of West Virginia Chamber of Commerce for

leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

92-5938 IN RE FRED WHITAKER

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied. Rule 39.8. Petitioner is

allowed until December 7, 1992, within which to pay the

docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a

petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this

Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny

the petition for a writ of prohibition.

92-6036 FORD, MASON V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until

December 7, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in

compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed

in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I

would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without

reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma

pauperis.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

92-466 BROOKE GROUP LTD. V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO

92-551 KEMP, SEC. OF HUD, ET AL. V. ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, ET AL.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

92-531 HATCHER, KIM A. V. ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted

limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

CERTIORARI DENIED

91-1872 FEIST PUB., INC. V. RURAL TELEPHONE SERV.

91-1885 WILSON, PETE, ET AL. V. DEL MONTE, CHARLES, ET AL.

91-8574 HARRIS, VINCENT D. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC

91-8725 BELL, JAMES H. V. BAKER, WARDEN

91-8745 ESPELITA, GREGONIA M. V. DERWINSKI, SEC. OF VA

92-30 ZYCH, HARRY, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS HISTORIC PRESERV.

92-211 OKLAHOMA, COMMR. LAND OFFICE V. CROOK, RANDY L., ET AL.

92-338 COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY V. NLRB

92-384 CASH, ROBERT L., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

92-518 DOUGHTY, MARVIS V. ZOECON CORP.

92-524 CRAM, LILLIAM V. MAXWELL, HUGH, ETC.

92-535 O'BRIEN, CHARLES, ET AL. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A.

92-536 DURHAM, HARVEY V. CORUM, ALVIS

92-538 PELFRESNE, DONALD V. WILLIAMS BAY, ET AL.

92-540 LABOR UNION OF PICO, ET AL. V. PICO PROD., INC., ET AL.

92-546 WASHINGTON WATER POWER CO. V. SPOKANE INDIAN TRIBE

92-549 ATER, DON V. ARMSTRONG, DAVID, ET AL.

92-550 SAARI, HOWARD E. V. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS, ETC.

92-553 KAHN, PHYLLIS, ET AL. V. KOHLBERG, KRAVIS, ET AL.

92-559 DUVAL COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL. V. PEREZ, ANTONIA, ET AL.

92-570 SHARPTON, ALFRED C. V. TURNER, JUDGE, ET AL.

92-599 LINARES, ZOILO, ET AL. V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT. CLINTON

92-618 McCANN, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. CHICAGO

92-619 PATRICK, GEORGE EDWARD V. UNITED STATES

92-661 ROSS, SPECK ARON V. UNITED STATES

92-667 TENAX CORP., ET AL. V. TENSAR CORPORATION

92-5015 COOGAN, CHARLES C. V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN

92-5199 BITTENBENDER, CARLTON L. V. TAYLOR, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-5256 AGUIRRE, ARNOLDO V. UNITED STATES

92-5376 CALIA, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATES

92-5384 CARVER, EDWARD V. CARVER, PAULETTE ET AL.

92-5392 KIRSCH, KEVIN E. V. WISCONSIN

92-5526 PHILLIPS, DARNELL V. UNITED STATES

92-5613 CARLINI, ANGELA A. V. UNITED STATES

92-5636 VIVES, DAVID V. UNITED STATES

92-5654 HALL, MELVIN H. V. UNITED STATES

92-5658 RAY, SHERILYN Y. V. UNITED STATES

92-5672 KASSIM, ZAID V. UNITED STATES

92-5847 HARDY, JAMES V. CALIFORNIA

92-5867 BROWN, BENNY M. V. UNITED STATES

92-5876 EARLE, ALLEN V. UNITED STATES

92-5920 DESMOND, JOHN F. V. CITY OF QUINCY, MA, ET AL.

92-5921 CATELL, MICHAEL J. V. SMYTHE, ADMIN., HALAWA CORR.

92-5922 TRUNDY, EUGENE V. MAGNUSSON, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-5923 BIGGS, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. LYNAUGH, EXEC. DIR., TX DCJ

92-5933 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ

92-5934 WIGLEY, TROY E. V. HUGHES UNIT, TX, DCJ, ET AL.

92-5935 WRIGHT, MELVIN V. KEANE, SUPT., SING SING

92-5946 BAUTISTA, ANTONIO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

92-5953 BOBO, THOMAS J. V. CONLIN, NANCY E., ET AL.

92-5958 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. SAXTON, SAMUEL, ET AL.

92-5963 BOOTH, JOHN V. MARYLAND

92-5974 VEGA, MARTIN S. V. TEXAS

92-5997 ZIEBARTH, SYLVESTER V. FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL

92-6018 BUCHANAN, DOUGLAS McA. V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC, ET AL.

92-6020 SMITH, WILLIAM S. V. ALAMEDA CTY. SHERIFF, ET AL.

92-6042 RIDER, LAWRENCE E. V. DEEDS, WARDEN

92-6067 AVANA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES

92-6078 SCHOOLEY, LONNIE EUGENE V. SOWDERS, WARDEN

92-6096 ) EVANS, BRUCE K. V. UNITED STATES

)

92-6208 ) EVANS, JACK V. UNITED STATES

92-6119 SPEARS, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES

92-6156 KERNICK, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES

92-6175 ROBLEDO, GUSTAVO V. UNITED STATES

92-6183 ) HOLLEY, GERALDINE S. V. UNITED STATES

)

92-6250 ) HATLEY, CHARLES A. V. UNITED STATES

92-6188 PETE, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES

92-6190 MARTIN, WILSON V. UNITED STATES

92-6191 WOFFORD, RACHEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6194 CABEZAS-COLON, LUIS H. V. UNITED STATES

92-6195 LOPEZ-ALVAREZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES

92-6199 CUNNINGHAM, G. HAZEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6201 GARIBAY-BRAVO, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES

92-6205 GREGORY, EARL V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC

92-6207 JOHNSON, RAYMOND V. UNITED STATES

92-6211 MENDEZ, RAPHAEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6212 QUIROZ, SAMUEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6213 LEVINSON, MELVIN E. V. UNITED STATES

92-6221 GARZA, JOSEPH H. V. UNITED STATES

92-6222 BAUTISTA, RAFAEL CASTILLO V. UNITED STATES

92-6223 ALZATE, MIGUEL ANGEL V. UNITED STATES

92-6225 ARIGBEDE, OLAKUNLE LANRE V. UNITED STATES

92-6226 SAVOY, ROBERT DION V. UNITED STATES

92-6227 CASEY, JAMES ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

92-6228 SABB, LINWARD V. UNITED STATES

92-6237 SALLY, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES

92-6241 WALKER, LARRY V. UNITED STATES

92-6245 MONTOYA, EDGAR V. UNITED STATES

92-6251 HOLGUIN, CARLOS O. V. UNITED STATES

92-6254 RILEY, CHARLES N. V. UNITED STATES

92-6257 CARTER, ROBERT JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES

92-6263 SONSHINE, GLENN HOWARD V. UNITED STATES

92-6268 STRICKLAND, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES

92-6269 WEAVER, PRISCILLA V. UNITED STATES

92-6270 ABATE, TESHOME V. GOLDSMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.

92-6272 TROUTMAN, LATROY V. UNITED STATES

92-6273 SASSI, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES

92-6275 MICKENS, ERIC ELIJAH V. UNITED STATES

92-6279 HUNTER, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES

92-6283 FRIEDMAN, BARRY M. V. UNITED STATES

92-6284 KWASNY, ROBERT M. V. UNITED STATES

92-6286 BYRD, WAYNE M. V. UNITED STATES

92-6295 LUERA, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES

92-6300 EVANS, RANDALL P. V. UNITED STATES

92-6301 HENNINGHAM, GLENN V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

92-111 DIXON, GARY, ET AL. V. WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is granted. The motion of Criminal

Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as

amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of

certiorari is denied.

92-530 GEORGE BASCH CO. V. BLUE CORAL, INC., ET AL.

92-533 ADAMS, NICOLE, ETC., ET AL. V. CHILDREN'S MERCY, ET AL.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.

92-532 ARIZONA V. BARTLETT, JOSEPH

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of

certiorari is denied.

92-5270 DICKERSON, BERNARD V. RYAN, SUPT., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.

REHEARINGS DENIED

91-1891 KING, ELINOR S. V. JAMES, L. FOSTER, ET AL.

91-7872 MUHAMMAD, ABDUL-JABBAR V. UNITED STATES

91-7975 IN RE JACK D. LIFFITON

91-8266 LYLE, ROGER L. V. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORR.

91-8414 BROWN, CARSON L. V. BROWN, ROBERT, ET AL.

91-8545 SUEING, JEROME V. BROWN, DIR., MICHIGAN DOC.

91-8699 CLAUSEN, PETER T. V. ANNICH, RUSSELL W., ET AL.

92-45 STONEHILL, HARRY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

92-113 RAMIREZ, MARIA G. V. TEXAS

92-364 PLEMONS, JOHN V. UNITED STATES

92-5034 IN RE NEWTON C. ESTES

92-5204 YATES, MACK B. V. GARNER, JACK, ET AL.

92-5388 WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS LOUIS V. UNITED STATES

92-5465 MANWANI, RAM P. V. SCHONZEIT, ET AL.

92-5466 MULAZIM, FA'DEE V. REDMAN, WARDEN

92-5591 TAYLOR, ROOSEVELT V. BARBER, EDNA, ET AL.

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

92-353 GAMBOCZ, BILL J. V. McCALLUM, CAROLINE, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed

further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The

petition for rehearing is denied.

92-5556 OMOIKE, ISAAC I. V. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY

The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice

Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision

of this petition.

MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION

The written motions for admission of the following

lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: