WPCb 2BPZCourier 10cpi#|xwx6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIIDHPLASIII.PRSx  @,\,BvX@22:B Z|#|xCourier 10cpiCourier 10cpi (Bold)Courier 10cpi (Italic)HP LaserJet IIIDHPLASIII.PRSx  @,\,BvX@2XF``?xxx,wx6X@8;X@?xxx,x `B;X?xxx,#Ax6Nh ;XHX,,xXlU:X,,x        X  ORDER LIST MONDAY, JUNE 28, 1993 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 91-882 LEWY, LAWRENCE E., ET AL. V. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF TAXATION The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Virginia for further consideration in  ?H  light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-1436 SWANSON, NORMAN, ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further  ?  consideration in light of Harper v. Virginia Department  ?8  of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-1473 SHEEHY, EDMUND, ET AL. V. MT DEPT. OF REVENUE The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Montana for further consideration in  ?  light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-1697 BASS, FRANCIS, ET AL. V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL. The motion of Tax Section, South Carolina Bar, for  ?H&  leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The'0*((Ԍ judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further  ?   consideration in light of Harper v. Virginia Department  ?  of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-1913 OHIO V. DeMUTH, KEVIN The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lucas County, for further  ?  consideration in light of United States v. Dixon, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-1924 AYUDA, INC., ET AL. V. RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of  ?p  Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-2047 NORWEST BANK, ETC., ET AL. V. McCLUNG, DOROTHY, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Minnesota for further consideration in  ?  light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-6745 RICHARDSON, MIGUEL A. V. TEXAS  ?%  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?'  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari '0*((Ԍ are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for  ?   further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-8105 EARHART, JAMES O. V. TEXAS  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?`  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for  ?  further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509 U. S.   (1993). 91-8435 GRANVIEL, KENNETH V. TEXAS  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?P  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for  ?  further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-335 ALABAMA V. LEIGHTON, RICHARD COLE The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further  ?`"  consideration in light of United States v. Dixon, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-451 RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL L V. PERALES, CESAR A., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. '0*((Ԍ The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit  ?   for further consideration in light of Reno v. Catholic  ?  Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-521 DUFFY, EUGENE H., ET AL. V. WETZLER, JAMES W., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of  ?  Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-528 SALE, ACTING COMMR., INS V. HAITIAN CENTERS COUNCIL The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals  ?  for the Second Circuit is vacated as moot. See United  ?p  States v. Munsingwear, 340 U. S. 36, 39-40 (1950);  ?  University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U. S. 390 (1981). 92-773 RENO, ATTY. GENERAL V. ADULT VIDEO ASSN., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  ?  further consideration in light of Alexander v. United  ?`"  States, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-849 INS, ET AL. V. ZAMBRANO, MARTA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the '0*((Ԍ United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  ?  further consideration in light of Reno v. Catholic  ?   Social Services, Inc., 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-1276 REICH, CHARLES V. COLLINS, MARCUS, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Georgia for further consideration in  ?  light of Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-1522 AM. NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. V. HANSON, H. C., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kentucky for further consideration in  ?P  light of TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources  ?  Corp., 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-5580 LUCAS, HENRY L. V. TEXAS  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for  ?@  further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509 U. S.   (1993). 92-7433 HALE, ALVIE J. V. U.S. DOJ, ET AL.  ?#  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?%  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is '0*((Ԍ remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of  ?   United States Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U. S.   (1993). 92-7567 HAWKINS, SAMUEL V. TEXAS  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?`  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for  ?  further consideration in light of Johnson v. Texas, 509 U. S.   (1993).  ?  ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No.   IN THE MATTER OF HAYDEN F. BURGESS FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THIS COURT The motion for reconsideration of the denial of admission to the Bar of this Court is denied. No.   IN THE MATTER OF CLARK O. BREWSTER FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THIS COURT The motion for further consideration of the application for admission to the Bar of this Court is denied. No.   EMMETT K. TROYER AND CAROL L. TROYER V. UNITED STATES The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari outoftime is denied. '0*((Ԍ A909 EDWARD LEWIS V. UNITED STATES The application for stay addressed to Justice Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied. D-1236 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY EDWARD PROTOKOWICZ, J It having been reported to the Court that Stanley Edward Protokowicz, Jr., of Bel Air, Maryland, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of February 22, 1993, having suspended the said Stanley Edward Protokowicz, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Stanley Edward Protokowicz, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1248 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JANICE MARIE HAYES It having been reported to the Court that Janice Marie Hayes, of Las Vegas, Nevada, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Nevada and this Court by order of March 22, 1993, having suspended the said Janice Marie Hayes from the practice '0*((Ԍ of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Janice Marie Hayes be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. 109, Orig. OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States on the Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Judgment and Decree. 91-1950 AMERICAN DREDGING CO. V. MILLER, WILLIAM R. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to  ?  participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. 92-519 JOHNSON, BOLLEY, ET AL. V. DE GRANDY, MIGUEL, ET AL. The motion of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights  ?  Under Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. 92-989 TENNESSEE V. MIDDLEBROOKS, DONALD The motion of Appellate Committee of the California District Attorneys' Association for leave to file a '0*((Ԍ ?  brief as amicus curiae is granted. 92-1012 SIMPSON PAPER (VT) CO. V. DEPT OF ENVTL CONSERV, ET AL The motion of respondent Vermont to strike the supplement is denied. 92-1482 WEISS, ERIC V. UNITED STATES The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. 92-1510 CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. ROLLER, GARY LEE The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that W. Gaston Fairey, Esquire, of Columbia, South Carolina, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case. 921971 MOORE, JACKIE, ET AL. V. ESPY, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE (A927) The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied. 92-6921 LITEKY, JOHN PATRICK, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Peter Thompson, Esquire, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case. 92-7549 SCHIRO, THOMAS V. CLARK, SUPT., ET AL. The motion of petitioner to enlarge the record is granted. 92-8643 QURESHI, MASHUQ AHMAD V. ALEXANDRIA HOSPITAL, ET AL.  ?%  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?'  forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until ' 0*((Ԍ July 19, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.  ?  CERTIORARI GRANTED 92-1479 McDERMOTT, INC. V. AmCLYDE, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. 92-1662 UNITED STATES V. GRANDERSON, RALPH STUART  ?  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  ?h  forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 92-8579 ELDER, CHARLES K. V. HOLLOWAY, R. D., ET AL.  ?  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  ?  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.  ?X  CERTIORARI DENIED 91-375 PLEDGER, JAMES, ET AL. V. BOSNICK, STANLEY, ET AL. 91-1131 ) WINTHERTHUR REINSURANCE V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ) 91-1146 ) UNIONAMERICA INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 91-5862 BOGGESS, CLIFFORD H. V. TEXAS 91-7399 JACKSON, JIMMY V. TEXAS 91-7669 WILKERSON, RICHARD J. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 91-8433 GOSCH, LESLEY L. V. TEXAS 91-8516 GOSS, CORNELIUS A. V. TEXAS' 0*((Ԍ 91-8742 JAMES, JOHNNY V. TEXAS 91-8768 FULLER, TYRONE L. V. TEXAS 92-844 OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS V. ADAMS, LEONARD, ET AL. 92-1366 DeCAMP, JOHN V. DOUGLAS CTY., ETC., ET AL. 92-1376 NICKERSON AM. PLANT BREEDERS V. LATHAM SEED CO., ET AL. 92-1453 COLLINS, MARCUS, ET AL. V. REICH, CHARLES J. 92-1471 ) CELOTEX CORPORATION V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL. ) 92-1474 ) FIBREBOARD CORPORATION V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL. 92-1505 COLLAGEN CORPORATION V. KENNEDY, CHARLOTTE, ET AL. 92-1508 WOODARD, LEE, ET AL. V. SEGHETTI, RALPH, ET AL. 92-1708 NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INS. CO. V. DEFENDER INDUS., ET AL. 92-1746 BOSTIC, RAY V. CHICAGO, ET AL. 92-1754 JACOBSON, MICHAEL V. ILLINOIS 92-1755 LAMBORNE, DONALD V. HAYNES, BRADLEY, ET AL. 92-1756 SEVER, THOMAS, ET AL. V. FELICE, THOMAS 92-1760 DeCOSTA, DAVID, ETC. V. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL 92-1763 VALENTINE SUGARS INC. V. DONAU CORP., ET AL. 92-1765 CULLEN, MARK V. HOUSING AUTH, SACRAMENTO CTY 92-1773 WALKER, THELMA V. WINDOM, STEPHEN, ET AL. 92-1775 ) RAWL SALES, ETC. V. TRUSTEES, UMWA 1974, ET AL. ) 92-1945 ) PITTSTON COMPANY, ET AL. V. UNITED MINE WORKERS, ET AL. 92-1776 JOHNSON, MOSSIE V. LYNCH, DENNIS, ETC., ET AL. 92-1779 CARTER, J. MATTHEW, ET AL. V. ST. LOUIS, ET AL. 92-1780 GEICK, EDWARD V. KAY, JAMES, ETC., ET AL. 92-1781 CASEY, FRANKLIN, ET AL. V. NationsBANK OF TEXAS, ET AL. 92-1785 IHC HOSPITALS, INC., ET AL. V. DECKER, JOSEPH ' 0*((Ԍ 92-1787 NEWMAN, ROBERT V. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO 92-1792 HELINSKI, RONALD V. ROSENBERG, LEON 92-1796 SANDERS, DORSEY V. FLORIDA 92-1800 LEWIS, SCOTT, ET UX. V. BABCOCK INDUSTRIES, ET AL. 92-1811 McCULLOM, GREGORY V. PRINCETON BD. OF ED., ET AL. 92-1815 HEFTI, CHARLES, ET UX. V. McGRATH, KEVIN, ET AL. 92-1816 GREER, EDWARD, ET UX. V. GASTON, ARTHUR 92-1853 RANGE, LITHO V. UNITED STATES 92-1858 SIMPSON, JANET, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 92-1859 KRAWSHUK, GEORGE V. HOUSTON, ROBERT, ET AL. 92-1875 ) PARDUE, JACK V. UNITED STATES ) 92-8724 ) PARDUE, DAVID V. UNITED STATES ) 92-8771 ) PARDUE, MICHEL V. UNITED STATES 92-1876 UNDERWOOD, JAMES H. V. UNITED STATES 92-5088 HOLLAND, DAVID L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5153 JOINER, ORIEN C. V. TEXAS 92-5182 KELLY, CARL E. V. TEXAS 92-5841 BRIDGE, WARREN E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5846 HARRIS, DANNY R. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-5865 DREW, ROBERT N. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6035 DRAUGHON, MARTIN A. V. TEXAS 92-6394 CANTU, RUBEN MONTOYA V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-6439 CLARK, WILLIE EARL V. UNITED STATES 92-6942 NEWTON, FRANCES ELAINE V. TEXAS 92-6953 DUNN, KENNETH V. TEXAS 92-7120 CANTU, DOMINGO V. TEXAS ' 0*((Ԍ 92-7213 BONHAM, ANTONIO N. V. TEXAS 92-7360 SALDIVAR-GONZALEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES 92-7499 JARVIS, DOUGLAS A. V. UNITED STATES 92-7530 JACOBS, JESSE D. V. TEXAS 92-7919 BLUE, MICHAEL LYNN V. TEXAS 92-7972 RABBANI, SYED MOHMED V. TEXAS 92-7979 HAMPEL, NATALYA T., ET VIR V. AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA, ETC. 92-8191 FUNKHOUSER, DENNIS S. V. SAFFLE, REGIONAL DIR., ET AL 92-8212 HUNTER, BERT L. V. MISSOURI 92-8318 HARRELL, NATHANIEL V. UNITED STATES 92-8323 JAMES, ARTHUR T. V. UNITED STATES 92-8344 COOKS, VINCENT EDWARD V. TEXAS 92-8412 LEE, RALPH V. UNITED STATES 92-8455 NANTZ, DONALD WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 92-8513 SANCHEZ, ENRIQUE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-8514 SAPP, HORACE V. BRADY, THOMAS 92-8516 HERNANDEZ, HENRY D. V. TEXAS 92-8518 GOTCHEY, WILLIAM S. V. SEC 92-8520 HOWE, DIANE J. V. MICHIGAN 92-8521 FARMELANT, ANNABELLE V. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. 92-8535 MITCHELL, JAMES V. IRVIN, SUPT., WENDE CORR. 92-8538 LEWIS, CHARLES E. V. LYNN, BRUCE N., ET AL. 92-8540 RODGERS, EDWARD D. V. TRIGG, SUPT.,IN YOUTH CENTER 92-8543 KLEINSCHMIDT, WILLIAM E. V. U.S. FIDELITY, ET AL. 92-8545 JENKINS, COLIN, ET AL. V. UTAH 92-8552 TAGGART, ARTHUR V. ILLINOIS ' 0*((Ԍ 92-8555 SLUSHER, FLOYD DAVID V. COLORADO 92-8564 PALMER, GARY SKIPPER V. CALIFORNIA 92-8572 BROWNE, ANTHONY V. IOWA 92-8573 ENDRES, ROBERT L. V. DELO, SUPT. 92-8574 FAIRCHILD, BARRY L. V. ENDELL, DIR., AR DOC 92-8575 JONES, CHARLES W. V. ST. PAUL, MN, ET AL. 92-8577 HINES, LARRY D. V. BORG, WARDEN 92-8580 HUNT, EANOS E. V. MILLS, WARDEN 92-8584 JEFFERS, LEROY R. V. CLARK, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-8585 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH V. FREEMAN, DAVID, ET AL. 92-8586 SNYDER, FRANK V. CALIFORNIA 92-8589 WEST, BRENDA KAY V. TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER 92-8596 JAMES, CARL V. IVINS, GREGG, ET AL. 92-8607 STEEL, JOHN V. STEEL, ROBERT, ET AL. 92-8612 HILLESHIEM, BECKI A. V. WISCONSIN 92-8619 PARKER, JOHN V. ALABAMA 92-8627 LEWIS, CHARLES E. V. LYNN, SEC., LA DOC, ET AL. 92-8628 MITCHELL, RONALD B. V. OHIO 92-8636 JASINSKI, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-8640 O'BRIEN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-8642 PANADERO, K'MARYAN V. UNITED STATES 92-8644 McCLAIN, CARLTON V. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY 92-8647 LEON, TIMOTHY J. V. CARROLL, WARDEN 92-8650 WASHINGTON, TODD V. ILLINOIS 92-8659 BASS, HOWARD S. V. BASS, DEBORAH 92-8663 HUNT, MICHAEL A. V. VASQUEZ, WARDEN '0*((Ԍ 92-8664 IVY, ARTHUR V. MERIDIAN, MS, ET AL. 92-8668 CAMACHO, GENARO V. UNITED STATES 92-8674 MASSENGILL, MARSHALL E. V. DORSEY, WARDEN 92-8675 NOBLE, DAVID V. JOHNSON, RANDALL 92-8676 MILLER, CARL F. V. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS 92-8677 McCOY, ROBERT EARL V. LOCKHART, DIR., AR DOC 92-8681 RICHEY, SHANE P. V. YARBOROUGH, WARDEN 92-8684 GARCIA, DAVID MONTIEL V. UNITED STATES 92-8695 COX, ROBERT B. V. UNITED STATES 92-8698 MUINA, JOSH V. KKK ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA 92-8714 MAXWELL, GEORGE V. CONNECTICUT 92-8718 CRAIG, BRYAN LANG V. BURTON, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-8720 CRONEY, BARBREE V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 92-8750 CHIA, SAMUEL G. V. BABBITT, SEC. OF INTERIOR 92-8768 MILTON, HUBERT EARL V. UNITED STATES 92-8790 WARMSLEY, LANDON V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ 92-8813 SIMMONS, ROBERT LEE V. UNITED STATES 92-8815 EDNEY, WARREN L. V. UNITED STATES 92-8816 SPIVEY, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES 92-8818 VONGSAY, TODD LINH V. UNITED STATES 92-8819 SALAZAR, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES 92-8820 JOHNSON, HUEY V. UNITED STATES 92-8824 GRANDERSON, RALPH S. V. UNITED STATES 92-8826 COOK, JUDITH K. V. FLORIDA 92-8829 THOMPSON, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES 92-8830 TRAINER, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 92-8833 SALCIDO, JULIO V. UNITED STATES 92-8837 MONTGOMERY, DANIEL LYNN V. UNITED STATES 92-8838 WHITE, ROBERT GEORGE V. UNITED STATES 92-8839 RUNNELLS, WILLIAM ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 92-8840 MEDINA, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES 92-8842 ROMON, ANDES MARGARITO V. UNITED STATES 92-8844 PICART, AUREA V. UNITED STATES 92-8848 DIAMOND, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES 92-8852 HATHORN, GENE W. V. TEXAS 92-8854 CURE, JAMES B. V. UNITED STATES 92-8858 ARIAS, HERNANDO V. UNITED STATES 92-8859 ROQUEMORE, JOHN KEITH V. UNITED STATES 92-8868 SAN-MIGUEL, MICHAEL PEREZ V. UNITED STATES 92-8880 ROCCIO, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES 92-8881 RYMAN, JOHN MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 92-8882 LADY, DONALD KENNETH V. UNITED STATES 92-8885 HOSTEN, WILLIE C. V. UNITED STATES 92-8898 DENNIS, DERRICK RENARDO V. UNITED STATES 92-8900 RAMSEY, JOHN HENRY V. UNITED STATES 92-8901 LOVE, LEON D. V. UNITED STATES 92-8913 HEARN, JERRY V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 92-361 SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS V. GUTIERREZ, JOEY V.  ?#  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  ?%  forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. '0*((Ԍ 92-1241 OWENS-IL, INC. V. POOL, REUBEN, ET AL. The motion of Continental Casualty Company for  ?   leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.  ?  HABEAS CORPUS DENIED 92-8937 IN RE JOSEPH ZIEGLER The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.  ?  MANDAMUS DENIED 92-8587 IN RE MICHAEL VIGIL 92-8599 IN RE GEORGE I. BENNY 92-8649 IN RE ROY A. DAY 92-8710 IN RE PHILIP R. ANDERSON The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied. 92-8472 IN RE EILEEN VEY 92-8473 IN RE EILEEN VEY 92-8646 IN RE JOHN O'LEARY The petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are denied.  ?@  REHEARINGS DENIED 91-1030 WITHROW, PAMELA V. WILLIAMS, ROBERT 92-259 OK TAX COMMN. V. SAC & FOX NATION 92-1512 MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT CO. V. INTL. UNION, UN. AUTO., ETC. 92-1551 IN RE JESSIE McDONALD 92-1565 SELTZER, RICHARD V. OPM'0*((Ԍ 92-1724 DiNOLA, EMILIA V. STEWART, ROBERT, ET AL. 92-7249 HOLLY, WILLIAM V. TRUE, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-7893 BEAUMONT, JIMMY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 92-7955 VEY, EILEEN V. WOLFE, ATTORNEY GEN. OF PA 92-7958 HUGHES, HOWARD V. BORGERT, WARDEN 92-7974 MIX, JAMES RILEY V. CITY OF HAZEL PARK, ET AL. 92-8009 MORRISON, CURTIS LEE V. ESTELLE, WARDEN 92-8092 RAPHLAH, RAPHAEL V. TEXAS 92-8103 IN RE DAVID G. HARRIS 92-8107 WATTS, GARY V. MAZURKIEWICZ, WARDEN, ET AL. 92-8259 DEMPSEY, JOHN V. HARSHBARGER, MA AG The petitions for rehearing are denied.  ? ( ORDER ă Pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 42, it is ordered that Justice Thomas be, and he is hereby, assigned to the Tenth Circuit as Circuit Justice pending further order of the Court.  ? % RECESS ORDER ă The Court will take a recess from today until the first Monday in October, 1993 at which time the October 1992 Term will adjourn.  ?$  MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:'0*((Ԍ