WPC= 2ABcR Z23|[ "m^36Gff%==\o3=33ffffffffff33oooQzKfzztzp=o=o\%ffQi\=bp:6m:p\ifQUGpbbbX=o=o=3============i:fffffQ\\\\K:K:K:K:p\\\\ppppbfi\\b\zifffQQQQi\\\\bbbbbbppK:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:pppp\\QQQtUtUtUtUzGzGzGppppppbpXpXpXiz:pQtUzGbbi\pNo3o\6QNNfff=7f=f=%GGf//\\pp%G=ooee3o<HYYY66^E@@@@(JEEE66;,1N11@@@A9<16%7,7(7,A6C/A1>1P7A/:,A1E12156(7(>4E/A1H>E>9(6144>986@9999999999999999999(((((((666666666666666666661111111444444444444>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A7AA>E>1"m^!+==\Z%%7C%==========CCC1QOOOVOIV\-=VIhZVIVOEIZOlMMC%C%C7==1?7%;C#!A#bC7?=13+C;V;;5%C%C%%%n%%%%%%%%%%?#O=O=O=O=O=nXO1O7O7O7O7-#-#-#-#ZCV7V7V7V7ZCZCZCZCM;O=V?V7V7M;V7I?O=O=O=O1O1O1O1V?O7O7O7O7V;V;V;V;V;V;\C\C-#-#-#-#=VAI#I#I#I#I#ZCZCZCZCV7V7n\O1O1O1E3E3E3E3I+I+I+ZCZCZCZCZCZClVM;C5C5C5V?I#ZCO1E3I+M;M;V?V7ZCNCC7!1//===%!\\=%QQ=\%++=n77nCCn+n%CC<gn|g|n|SR}{nnnRRnnnnnnnRRRRRRRRRRRRSS"m^*,:SS}z22K[*2**SSSSSSSSSS**[[[Collluldu}=Sudzudul_dzljj\2[2[KSSCVK2Q\/,Y/\KVSCE:\QuQQH2[2[2*222222222222V/lSlSlSlSlSwlClKlKlKlK=/=/=/=/z\uKuKuKuKz\z\z\z\jQlSuVuKuKjQuKdVlSlSlSlClClClCuVlKlKlKlKuQuQuQuQuQuQ}\}\=/=/=/=/SuYd/d/d/d/d/z\z\z\z\uKuK}lClClC_E_E_E_Ed:d:d:z\z\z\z\z\z\ujQ\H\H\HuVd/z\lC_Ed:jQjQuVuKz\N[*[K,C@@SSS2-}}S2ooS}2::S''KK\\:2[[RRk*[11RRRkskk[ZZ<[){kJ%>gwZZskkkkB{sssZZcJRRRkkkl_dRZ>\J\B\JlZoN21mRgR\lNaJlRsRSRYZB\BhVrNlRwgsg_BZ11RVVg_]Zk___________________BBBBBBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ111111111111RRRRRRRVVVVVVVVVVVVggggggggggggggggggggl\l2lhs2hR"X^?S}}SSS}?S?F}}}}}}}}}}SS}a}SFS}S}ooS}FSF}oaS}}}oc7cS?SS*SSSSSSSSSSF}}}}}oooooaFaFaFaF}}}}}}}}}}}}}oooooooo}}}}}}aFaFaFaF}FFFFF}}oooaaaaSSS}oooFoaS}}}NX?}S}}}}}}KS}K}KF}}}SS}}S}KF*RRdE|>gn|g|n|SR{nnnRRnnnnnnnRRRRRRRRRRRRSS"m^*2gwZZskkkkB{sssZZcJRRRkkkl_dRZ>\J\B\JlZoN21mRgR\lNaJlRsRSRYZB\BhVrNlRwgsg_BZ11RVVg_]Zk___________________BBBBBBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ111111111111RRRRRRRVVVVVVVVVVVVggggggggggggggggggggl\l2lhs2hR21c`#c&c&*^-"m^3=Iff%==\o3=3offffffffff33oooQzKpzzz~~z=o=o\%ifQpQ=bp=:f=p\ifQQAp_\\U=o=o=3============f=iiiiiQQQQQK=K=K=K=p\\\\pppp~\ip\\~\\ziiiiQQQQpQQQQbbbbbbppK=K=K=K=pfz=z=z=z=z=pppp\\QQQzQzQzQzQ~A~A~Apppppp~\zUzUzUpz=pQzQ~A~\~\p\pNo3w\=QNNfffMDf=f=3GG\==\\pp%G=ooee3o<>RRR1,zzR1llRz199R&&IIZZ91YYQQi)Y00QQQiqiiYXX;Y(yiH$<euXXqiiii@yqqqXXaHQQQiiij]bQX C  , , ( N N " An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 of this title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.!BQ d   J  ( , , As we explained in Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Her J mansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976), 1447(d) must be read  J in pari materia with 1447(c), so that only remands based on grounds specified in 1447(c) are immune from  JU review under 1447(d). Id., at 345!346. As long as a district court's remand is based on a timely raised defect in removal procedure or on lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction"the grounds for remand recognized by 1447(c)"#"   a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal of the remand order under 1447(d).  Section 1447(d) bars appellate review of the remand order in this case. As noted, 1447(d) precludes appellate review of any order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed. The parties do not dispute that the District Court's order remanded this case to the Ohio state court from which it came. There is also no dispute that the District Court remanded this case on grounds of untimely removal, precisely the type  Jp of removal defect contemplated by 1447(c).pi uB ԍ FTN    XgEpXFr  ddf < Section 1447(c) requires that a motion to remand for a defect in removal procedure be filed within 30 days of removal. Petitioner removed this case to federal court on September 25, 1992. Respondent filed motions to remand in the District Court on October 23, 1992, and in the Bankruptcy Court on November 25, 1992. Respondent's motion to remand filed in the District Court was sufficient to bring this case within the coverage of 1447(c). Section 1447(d) thus compels the conclusion that the District Court's order is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.  J See Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 430  J U.S. 723 (1977) (per curiam).   We reach the same conclusion regardless of whether removal was effected pursuant to 1441(a) or 1452(a). Section 1447(d) applies not only to remand orders made in suits removed under [the general removal statute], but  J to orders of remand made in cases removed under any  J other statutes, as well. United States v. Rice, 327 U.S.  J 742, 752 (1946) (emphasis added).i uB! ԍ FTN    XgEpXFr ddf < Rice interpreted the predecessor statute to 1447(d). The current version of 1447(d) is a recodification of the provision reviewed in  uB Rice and is intended to restate the prior law with respect to re uBF mand orders and their reviewability. Thermtron Products, Inc. v.  uB Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 349!350 (1976). Absent a clear statutory command to the contrary, we assume that Congress is aware of the universality of th[e] practice of denying appellate review of remand orders when Congress creates@$ "    J a new ground for removal. Ibid.  There is no express indication in 1452 that Congress intended that statute to be the exclusive provision governing removals and remands in bankruptcy. Nor is there any reason to infer from 1447(d) that Congress intended to exclude bankruptcy cases from its coverage. The fact that 1452 contains its own provision governing certain types of remands in bankruptcy, see 1452(b) (authorizing remand on any equitable ground and precluding appellate review of any decision to remand or not to remand on this basis), does not change our conclusion. There is no reason 1447(d) and 1452 cannot comfortably coexist in the bankruptcy context. We must, therefore, give effect  J to both. Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249, 253 (1992).   If an order remands a bankruptcy case to state court because of a timely raised defect in removal procedure or lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction, then a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review that order under 1447(d), regardless of whether the case was removed under 1441(a) or 1452(a). The remand at issue falls squarely within 1447(d), and the order is not reviewable on appeal.  The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is affirmed.  J  ` BIt is so ordered.ă