ORDER LIST

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

D-1411 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN ELIAS KARSCH

It having been reported to the Court that Stephen

Elias Karsch, of New York, New York, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,

Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department,

and this Court by order of June 20, 1994, having

suspended the said Stephen Elias Karsch from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Stephen Elias Karsch be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1414 IN THE MATTER OF JON LEE WOODSIDE

Jon Lee Woodside, of Portland, Oregon, having

requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this

Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the

roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of

this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on

June 27, 1994, is hereby discharged.

D-1416 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARY KENNETH MEYER

It having been reported to the Court that Gary

Kenneth Meyer, of New York, New York, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,

Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department,

and this Court by order of June 27, 1994, having

suspended the said Gary Kenneth Meyer from the practice

of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Gary Kenneth Meyer be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1418 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN B. GRIFFITH

It having been reported to the Court that John B.

Griffith, of Silver Spring, Maryland, has been suspended

from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of

Maryland and this Court by order of August 2, 1994,

having suspended the said John B. Griffith from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said John B. Griffith be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1422 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED M. MOSELY

It having been reported to the Court that Fred M.

Mosely, of East Cleveland, Ohio, has been disbarred from

the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio and

this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended

the said Fred M. Mosely from the practice of law in this

Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to

show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Fred M. Mosely be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1423 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NWABUEZE VINCENT OKOCHA

It having been reported to the Court that Nwabueze

Vincent Okocha, of Cleveland, Ohio, has been disbarred

from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio

and this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having

suspended the said Nwabueze Vincent Okocha from the

practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule

issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Nwabueze Vincent Okocha

be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1433 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES B. CORCES

It having been reported to the Court that Charles

B. Corces, of Tampa, Florida, has been suspended from

the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and

this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended

the said Charles B. Corces from the practice of law in

this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him

to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued

and served upon the respondent and that the time to file

a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Charles B. Corces be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and

that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys

admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

D-1437 IN THE MATTER OF FRED EVERETT JONES

Fred Everett Jones, of Memphis, Tennessee, having

requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this

Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the

roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of

this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on

August 24, 1994, is hereby discharged.

D-1457 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM LANCE GERLIN

It is ordered that William Lance Gerlin, of Coral

Gables, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law

in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-1458 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID PATTEN COLE

It is ordered that David Patten Cole, of Columbia,

South Carolina, be suspended from the practice of law in

this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within

forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-1459 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PATRICK L. DURUSAU

It is ordered that Patrick L. Durusau, of Conyers,

Georgia, be suspended from the practice of law in this

Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty

days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

92-2038 ASGROW SEED COMPANY V. DENNY WINTERBOER, ET AL.

The motion of respondents for additional time for

oral argument is denied.

93-768 MILWAUKEE BREWERY, ETC. V. JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING, ET AL.

The motion of Central States, Southeast and

Southwest Areas Pension Fund for leave to participate in

oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument

is denied.

93-1121 PLAUT, ED, ET UX., ET AL. V. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, ET AL.

The motion of National Association of Securities

and Commercial Law Attorneys for leave to file a brief

as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Pacific

Mutual Life Insurance Co. for leave to file a brief as

amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Michael B.

Dashjian for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is

granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for divided

argument is granted.

93-1151 FEC V. NRA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to

participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for

divided argument is granted. Justice Ginsburg took no

part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

93-1199 STONE, MARVIN V. INS

The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense

with printing the joint appendix is granted.

93-1260 UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, ALFONSO

The motion of Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, et

al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is denied.

93-1456 ) U.S. TERM LIMITS, ET AL. V. THORNTON, RAY, ET AL.

)

93-1828 ) BRYANT, ATTY. GEN. OF AR V. HILL, BOBBIE, ET AL.

The motion of the petitioners U.S. Term Limits,

et al. for additional time for oral argument is granted

and their motion for divided argument is denied. The

motion of the Attorney General of Arkansas for additional

time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted

and 15 additional minutes are allotted for that purpose.

The motion of respondents for additional time for oral

argument is granted and their motion for divided argument

is denied. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave

to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for

divided argument is granted and an additional 15 minutes

is allotted for that purpose.

93-1612 ) NationsBANK OF NC, ET AL. V. VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE, ET AL.

)

93-1613 ) LUDWIG, COMPTROLLER, ET AL. V. VARIABLE ANNUITY INS., ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for divided

argument is granted.

93-1636 SWINT, TOM, ET AL. V. CHAMBERS CTY. COMMN., ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to

participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for

divided argument is granted.

93-1660 ARIZONA V. EVANS, ISAAC

The motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al.

for leave to participate in oral argument as amici

curiae and for divided argument is denied.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

93-1462 CA DEPT. OF CORRS., ET AL. V. MORALES, JOSE RAMON

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondent is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

93-1577 QUALITEX COMPANY V. JACOBSON PRODUCTS CO., INC.

The motion of Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Corporation for

leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The

motion of International Trademark Association for leave

to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion

of American Bar Association for leave to file a brief as

amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of

certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented

by the petition. The brief of petitioner is to be filed

with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or

before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of

respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon

opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December

6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the

Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3

p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not

apply.

93-1783 DIR., OWCP, DEPT. OF LABOR V. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

93-1823 MISSOURI, ET AL. V. JENKINS, KALIMA, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

93-1841 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. V. PENA, SEC. OF TRANSP., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

93-1883 ANDERSON, ELOISE, ET AL. V. EDWARDS, VERNA, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

93-1935 CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. V. SCHOONEJONGEN, FRANK, ET AL.

The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United

States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is

granted. The motion of National Union Fire Insurance

Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file a

brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a

writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner

is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing

counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994.

The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk

and served uopn opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule

29.2 does not apply.

94-226 FLORIDA BAR V. McHENRY, G. STEWART, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk

and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,

Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel

on or before 3 p.m.,Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply

brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served

upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday,

December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply.

CERTIORARI DENIED

94-5004 WILLIAMS, WALTER V. SCOTT, DIR., TXDCJ

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.