ÿWPC ûÿ2lÿÿB%Y Z¯Courierury SchoolbookCourierCourier BoldCourier Oblique@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<hhhhð·Á€X@ÄzCyCyd)ooYsdCkz?;w?²zdsoY]Nzkœkk`CyCyéC8CCÈ!CCCCCCCCCCs?oooooÈŸYddddQ?Q?Q?Q?£zœdœdœdœd£z£z£z£zkoœsœdœdkœd…soooYYYYœsddddœkœkœkœkœkœk§z§zQ?Q?Q?Q?oœw…?…?…?…?…?£z£z£z£zœdœdȧYYY~]~]~]~]…N…N…N£z£z£z£z£z£zÄœkz`z`z`œs…?£zY~]…Nkkœsœd£zNy8yd;YUUoooC<§§oC““o§C)NNoÈ44ddÈzzÈ)NÈCÑyynn8!yBBnnnšyÅÅyyÐPy7¥c1R‰ŸÅÅÅyyКX¥šššyy„cn­nnÑ~…nyRzczXzcy”hCB‘n‰n²zhcnšnonvyXzXŠs™hnŸ‰š‰~XyBBnss‰~|y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~XXXXXXXyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyBBBBBBBBBBBBnnnnnnnssssssssssss‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰zCŠšCŠn#|dBoldTAPLASIIN.PRS0y˜à P[’'Chhhhð·Á€XPûÿ2ÿÿžÿÿžÿÿZ®#|dHP LaserJet IIIDHPLASIII.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<,\,ðÇBvX@ûÿ2ìX:ÿÿZ’ÿÿJÿÿ  Tÿÿr5ddd°ÈäŒdþ6X@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ’ÿÿs4ddd°ÃåŒdÐ `É“Kô€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿr5ddd°¼Œdô6NßhÉ[÷KôHþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿkœkœkœkœkœk§z§zQ?Q?Q?Q?oœw…?…?…?…?…?£z£z£z£zœdœdȧYYY~]~]~]~]…N…N…N£z£z£z£z£Letter Gothic 12cpi (Pro)Letter Gothic 12cpi Bold (Pro)Letter Gothic 12cpi Italic (Pro)ûÿ2 X~v‘ô‘… FTNEmpty TAG for pre-circ footnotes$,H1HEADER Level 1 (I)&ŠÁà¨ì)ÁØ€I.؃ OutlineTo set up outline text¨¹^õ‘ÒŒ I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. a. i.(1)(a)(i) 1) a)ŒÒÙÙÒŒ 1. a. i.(1)(a)(i) 1) a) 1. a. i.(1)(a)(i) 1) a)ŒÒ²OutlineBOutline with Bullets¨ö*’‘ÒŒ I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)-*+xŒÒÙÙÒŒ-*+x-*+xŒÒ²ûÿ2p‘H ›Ù ~t ~ò OutlineNOutline with numbers¨Ü¸-}‘ÒŒ I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1.(1) 1.(1) 1. 1) 1.ŒÒÙÙÒŒ 1. 1.(1) 1.(1) 1. 1) 1. 1. 1.(1) 1.(1) 1. 1) 1.ŒÒ²BQck QuoteSingle spaced indented quote'Ó" Ù ÙÐÐÂXÂÙ ÙÐÐH2HEADER Level 2 (A)&ïŒÁàˆì)ÁØA.؃ H3HEADER Level 3 (1)&\»ŽÁà™ì)ÁØ‚1.؃ ûÿ2ÿÿs¢ÿÿ1~ÿÿ"EnvelopeSet margins for envelope printing Uñâ´Ð ÷3Ø'3Ø'StandardÀˆ, Envelope-bondÀˆ, Envelope-bonderWriter IINTÖæÅä°°°°÷ ÐÐ °°À° ÐÐ °°Ø ° ÐÔ s4 Ôà ÃРȧ Ð ORDER LIST MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES Ä Ä D-1411 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN ELIAS KARSCH It having been reported to the Court that Stephen Elias Karsch, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of June 20, 1994, having suspended the said Stephen Elias Karsch from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Stephen Elias Karsch be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1414 IN THE MATTER OF JON LEE WOODSIDE Jon Lee Woodside, of Portland, Oregon, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on June 27, 1994, is hereby discharged. D-1416 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARY KENNETH MEYER It having been reported to the Court that Gary Kenneth Meyer, of New York, New York, has been disbarred ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ from the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of June 27, 1994, having suspended the said Gary Kenneth Meyer from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Gary Kenneth Meyer be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1418 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN B. GRIFFITH It having been reported to the Court that John B. Griffith, of Silver Spring, Maryland, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended the said John B. Griffith from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said John B. Griffith be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1422 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED M. MOSELY ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ It having been reported to the Court that Fred M. Mosely, of East Cleveland, Ohio, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio and this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended the said Fred M. Mosely from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Fred M. Mosely be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1423 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NWABUEZE VINCENT OKOCHA It having been reported to the Court that Nwabueze Vincent Okocha, of Cleveland, Ohio, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio and this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended the said Nwabueze Vincent Okocha from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Nwabueze Vincent Okocha be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1433 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES B. CORCES ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ It having been reported to the Court that Charles B. Corces, of Tampa, Florida, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of August 2, 1994, having suspended the said Charles B. Corces from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Charles B. Corces be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1437 IN THE MATTER OF FRED EVERETT JONES Fred Everett Jones, of Memphis, Tennessee, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on August 24, 1994, is hereby discharged. D-1457 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM LANCE GERLIN It is ordered that William Lance Gerlin, of Coral Gables, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1458 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID PATTEN COLE It is ordered that David Patten Cole, of Columbia, South Carolina, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1459 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PATRICK L. DURUSAU It is ordered that Patrick L. Durusau, of Conyers, Georgia, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 92-2038 ASGROW SEED COMPANY V. DENNY WINTERBOER, ET AL. The motion of respondents for additional time for oral argument is denied. 93-768 MILWAUKEE BREWERY, ETC. V. JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING, ET AL. The motion of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund for leave to participate in Ô r5D Ô oral argument as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is denied. 93-1121 PLAUT, ED, ET UX., ET AL. V. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, ET AL. The motion of National Association of Securities and Commercial Law Attorneys for leave to file a brief Ô r5Ê Ô as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. for leave to file a brief as Ô r5f Ô ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of Michael B. Ô r5´ Ô Dashjian for leave to file a brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument is granted. 93-1151 FEC V. NRA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to Ô r5:# Ô participate in oral argument as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is granted. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. 93-1199 STONE, MARVIN V. INS ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. 93-1260 UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, ALFONSO The motion of Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, et Ô r58 Ô al. for leave to file a brief as ÃÃamici curiaeÄÄ is denied. 93-1456 ) U.S. TERM LIMITS, ET AL. V. THORNTON, RAY, ET AL. ) 93-1828 ) BRYANT, ATTY. GEN. OF AR V. HILL, BOBBIE, ET AL. The motion of the petitioners U.S. Term Limits, ÁÁÁ` ` Á et al. for additional time for oral argument is granted and their motion for divided argument is denied. The motion of the Attorney General of Arkansas for additional time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and 15 additional minutes are allotted for that purpose. The motion of respondents for additional time for oral argument is granted and their motion for divided argument is denied. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave Ô r5à Ô to participate in oral argument as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is granted and an additional 15 minutes is allotted for that purpose. 93-1612 ) NationsBANK OF NC, ET AL. V. VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE, ET AL. ) 93-1613 ) LUDWIG, COMPTROLLER, ET AL. V. VARIABLE ANNUITY INS., ET AL. The motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument is granted. 93-1636 SWINT, TOM, ET AL. V. CHAMBERS CTY. COMMN., ET AL. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to Ô r5ž Ô participate in oral argument as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is granted. 93-1660 ARIZONA V. EVANS, ISAAC The motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. Ô r5Ö% Ô for leave to participate in oral argument as ÃÃamici Ô r5$' Ô curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is denied. ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ Ô s4§ Ôà à CERTIORARI GRANTED Ä Ä 93-1462 CA DEPT. OF CORRS., ET AL. V. MORALES, JOSE RAMON The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1577 QUALITEX COMPANY V. JACOBSON PRODUCTS CO., INC. The motion of Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Corporation for Ô r5 Ô leave to file a brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of International Trademark Association for leave Ô r59 Ô to file a brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of American Bar Association for leave to file a brief as Ô r5Õ Ô ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1783 DIR., OWCP, DEPT. OF LABOR V. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the ClerkÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1823 MISSOURI, ET AL. V. JENKINS, KALIMA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1841 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. V. PENA, SEC. OF TRANSP., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1883 ANDERSON, ELOISE, ET AL. V. EDWARDS, VERNA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 93-1935 CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. V. SCHOONEJONGEN, FRANK, ET AL. The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United Ô r5p Ô States for leave to file a brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The motion of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file a Ô r5Z Ô brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served uopn opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. 94-226 FLORIDA BAR V. McHENRY, G. STEWART, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m.,Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Rule 29.2 does not apply. ÔË' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ Ô s5§ ÔÁàšì+Áà ÃCERTIORARI DENIEDÄ Äƒ 94©5004 WILLIAMS, WALTER V. SCOTT, DIR., TXDCJ The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.