WPC 2%B ZgCourierCourier BoldCourier ObliqueApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d H@<hhhhN X@#|d2XX[Tr5dddd6X@K@s4dddd `Kr5dddd6Nh[KHbbbbbbppK:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:pppp\\QQQtUtUtUtUzGzGzGpppp########################################HJ s5     (ORDER LIST: 517 U.S.)  s5O ) MONDAY, APRIL 1, 1996 ă  s5E z # CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION ă 94-2130 FIRST ADV. INS., ET AL. V. GREEN, DOUGLAS, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, for further  r5  consideration in light of Barnett Bank v. Nelson, 517 U. S.   (1996). 94-7980 WINGO, KARL V. UNITED STATES  r5  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  r5  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of  r5<  Rutledge v. United States, 517 U. S.   (1996) and  r5  Bailey v. United States, 516 U. S.   (1995). 94-7981 WINGO, KIM V. UNITED STATES  r5&  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  r5t  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of  r5  Bailey v. United States, 516 U. S.   (1995). 95-296 McLEOD, PAMELA V. OREGON LITHOPRINT, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  r52%  further consideration in light of Varity Corporation v.  r5&  Howe, 516 U. S.   (1996). Justice Scalia would deny certiorari. 95-7315 AIKENS, WILLIE M. V. UNITED STATES)0*0*0*Ԍ r5 ԙ The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  r5N  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of  r5  Bailey v. United States, 516 U. S.   (1995).  s5" n( ORDERS IN PENDING CASES ă D-1662 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CRAWFORD WRAY BRINKLEY Crawford Wray Brinkley, of Conyers, Georgia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1663 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD HANS SEIKEL Harold Hans Seikel, of Garden City Park, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1664 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN TAD SEAMAN John Tad Seaman, of New Windsor, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1665 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EUGENE D. MICCI Eugene D. Micci, of Derby, Connecticut, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring '0*((Ԍ him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1666 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH F. O'KICKI Joseph F. O'Kicki, of Portage, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. M49 CHARLES BENOIT V. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL. M50 JIM CARROLL MARTIN V. GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION M51 DENNIS L. DELBRUEGGE V. BENSON CYTRON, ET AL. The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari outoftime are denied. 95-489 CO REPUB. FED. CAMPAIGN COMM V. FEC The motion of Brennan Center for Justice for leave  r59  to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. 95-754 ) MEDTRONIC, INC. V. LOHR, LORA, ET VIR ) 95-886 ) LOHR, LORA, ET VIR V. MEDTRONIC, INC. 95-809 LOCKHEED CORP., ET AL. V. SPINK, PAUL 95-860 SMILEY, BARBARA V. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A. The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to  r5   participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted. 95-865 UNITED STATES V. WINSTAR CORP., ET AL. The motion of respondents for divided argument is granted. 95-7693 JONES, SYLVESTER V. ACLU, ET AL.  r5#  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  r5/%  forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until April 22, 1996, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a'0*((Ԍ petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.  s5 B% APPEAL -- JURISDICTION NOTED ă 95-1201 LOPEZ, VICKY M., ET AL. V. MONTEREY COUNTY, CA, ET AL. In this case probable jurisdiction is noted.  s5 h* CERTIORARI GRANTED ă 95-853 M. L. B. vs. S. L. G., ETC., ET UX. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 95-1232 GMC V. TRACY, OH TAX COMMR. The motion of Committee on State Taxation for leave  r5  to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.  s5 + CERTIORARI DENIED ă 95-74 STEPHENS, DON, ET AL. V. OWENSBORO NATL. BANK, ET AL. 95-836 POSNER, DANIEL V. CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE, ET AL. 95-887 WAYMER, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 95-997 MERTZ, LEWIS V. KEY WEST, FL 95-1035 WERNER, THOMAS, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 95-1041 REYES, ARACELI, ET AL. V. LUGO, ROBERTO 95-1043 KENNEDY, ARRE V. UNITED STATES 95-1047 NOBLE, ELIZABETH, ET AL. V. COLUMBIA CTY. REDEV. AUTH. 95-1059 RICHEY, KENNETH V. OHIO 95-1063 BLOUNT, WILLIAM V. SEC, ET AL. 95-1079 MEYER, GEORGE V. NATL. SOLID WASTES, ET AL. 95-1080 PETEREIT, ROBERT, ET AL. V. S. B. THOMAS, INC. 95-1086 DISTAJO, EMILY, ET AL. V. DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. 95-1123 GODBY, JERRY V. ELECTROLUX CORP.'0*((Ԍ 95-1186 NH MOTOR TRANS., ET AL. V. PLAISTOW 95-1194 PELOQUIN, CHERYL V. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INS. CO 95-1202 HARTSELL, IEZHJA, ETC. V. FORT SANDERS REG. MED. CTR. 95-1211 NICIT, JOHN V. NICIT, ANNA 95-1212 BOLT, ALEX WAYNE V. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY 95-1213 DELOATCH, CHESTER V. HUGHES, MUZIE 95-1216 COOK, DENNIS, ET AL. V. CINCINNATI, OH, ET AL. 95-1217 DUSHAW, ROBERT V. ROADWAY EXPRESS, ET AL. 95-1218 ALLIGATOR FARMS, ET AL. V. GRONER, DAVID, ET AL. 95-1227 LA DEPT. TRANSP. & DEV. V. DOUCET, PAUL, ET AL. 95-1247 ROSENBERG, SYLVIA V. WACHTLER, SOL, ET AL. 95-1250 DOLCEFINO, WAYNE V. RAY, ELIZABETH 95-1260 EAGERTON, AL COMMR. OF REV. V. OWNER-OPERATOR INDEP. DRIVER 95-1296 TALLEY, FRANK V. FLATHEAD VALLEY COMM. COLL. 95-1300 CRAWFORD, LLOYD, ET AL. V. ROANE, JACK, ET AL. 95-1332 SILVA, FRANCISCO V. MADISON 95-1338 TSE, BERNARD, ET AL. V. SCHWARZSCHILD, RICHARD, ETC. 95-1356 TRUJILLO, ROBERT V. ILLINOIS 95-1358 HESS, CLARA V. MacASKILL, DIR., WOMEN'S CTR. 95-1366 HANLIN, ANNA, ET VIR V. SUPER. CT. CA (AM. GEN., RP) 95-1370 CARR, JEFFREY V. UNITED STATES 95-1401 LIBUTTI, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 95-1409 ESTACIO, BENITO V. UNITED STATES 95-1433 FIELDS, EARL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 95-6830 SMITH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 95-6897 ROBERTS, MONICA V. CHATER, COMMR., SOCIAL SEC. 95-7176 BRACEY, EDWARD V. PENNSYLVANIA 95-7290 ESPINOSA, JOSE E. V. UNITED STATES 95-7302 CULLUM, LARRY J. V. HAWK, DIR., BOP, ET AL. 95-7313 NAKAMOTO, DON T. V. UNITED STATES 95-7316 FRANKLIN, WILLIAM V. ILLINOIS '0*((Ԍ 95-7319 JONES, BENNY D. V. OKLAHOMA 95-7336 TOWNZEN, STEPHEN R. V. EL DORADO, CA 95-7374 DINGLE, BERNIE J. E. vs. VICTORY SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. 95-7414 SALZER, THOMAS V. DELLINGER, FREDERICK, ET AL. 95-7530 JOHNSON, EDDIE J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 95-7673 SMITH, DONALD V. HARGETT, SUPT., MS 95-7681 SILVERBURG, JOSEPH V. ASHLEY, WARDEN 95-7696 DEBBS, JOHN L., ET UX. V. CA WORKERS APPEAL BOARD 95-7698 PAGE, STEPHEN, ET AL. V. TX BD OF PARDONS, ET AL. 95-7701 COTNER, ROBERT E. V. NICHOLS, DOUG 95-7702 BOWEN, RAY M. V. GUNDY, DAVID, ET AL. 95-7709 BURR, JOHN E. V. NORTH CAROLINA 95-7714 RODRIGUEZ, TONY V. FLORIDA 95-7718 WALKER, TERRANCE V. AMES, IA 95-7724 BANKS, ALFRED V. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA, ET AL. 95-7729 FRYE, RONALD W. V. NORTH CAROLINA 95-7731 BRITO, RAY V. NEW YORK 95-7735 FREE, BILL R. V. CALIFORNIA 95-7749 WINTERS, ELMER V. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY 95-7752 SALAZAR, ALFONSO R. V. ARIZONA 95-7756 TOOTLE, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES 95-7760 SAATHOFF, RICK V. HESSE, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-7771 SHARP, STEPHEN V. CAWLEY, LYNN 95-7774 MACK, RICHARD V. SKUPNIEWITZ, CLERK 95-7785 JACKSON, L. J. vs. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 95-7821 BROWN, JAMES MARTIN V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC 95-7829 OXFORD, RICHARD V. BOWERSOX, SUPT., POTOSI 95-7872 PATIN, HURSEN V. CALIFORNIA 95-7881 ZAYAS, JOSE R. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA 95-7884 CALDWELL, DENNIS LEE V. ARKANSAS 95-7892 GRAVES, MICHAEL B. V. USCA FED. CIR. '0*((Ԍ 95-7912 PATTERSON, NECO V. CALIFORNIA 95-7927 MITCHELL, DOUGLAS E. V. BILBY-KNIGHT, L. 95-7942 CASARES, ISMAEL V. TEXAS 95-7979 BRIGGS, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES 95-7996 FORD, A. C. vs. MINNESOTA 95-8003 SARTIN, WELMONT HADEN V. VIRGINIA, ET AL. 95-8018 BUTLER, JAMES A. V. UNITED STATES 95-8020 BAPTISTE, ANDY DOUGLAS V. TEXAS 95-8036 HAMILL, ANTHONY R. V. FERGUSON, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-8037 FELTON, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 95-8046 SAUNDERS, EDWARD HAROLD V. UNITED STATES 95-8048 AKECH, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 95-8050 RELIFORD, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES 95-8051 RELIFORD, CHARLES V. SCOTT, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-8070 DIXON, CARL L. V. MAASS, SUPT., OR 95-8099 SHELTON, AARON V. UNITED STATES 95-8100 BYRD, LEON V. UNITED STATES 95-8104 ) JENNINGS, LORENZO V. UNITED STATES ) 95-8109 ) JENNINGS, LEONARD V. UNITED STATES 95-8106 MATTHEWS, BARRY L. V. UNITED STATES 95-8117 COUPAR, DOUGLAS ARTHUR V. TURNBO, REGIONAL DIR., FBOP 95-8119 SINIS, NICOLA V. UNITED STATES 95-8120 BERGMANN, JOHN S. V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN 95-8122 CASTNER, LARRY JAMES V. WHALEN, WARDEN 95-8123 BULLOCK, BRADFORD ALLEN V. UNITED STATES 95-8126 BLACKMAN, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 95-8127 BELL, STEVEN ALLEN V. UNITED STATES 95-8129 RIGGIO, FELIX V. UNITED STATES 95-8133 BONNER, VERNON V. UNITED STATES 95-8139 UNDERWOOD, TOMMY D. V. UNITED STATES 95-8140 WINTER, HOWARD T. V. UNITED STATES '0*((Ԍ 95-8144 MUNOZ, JORGE E. V. UNITED STATES 95-8145 McCARTHY, CHRISTOPHER V. UNITED STATES 95-8151 MAURO, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 95-8155 BECKER, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES 95-8159 McBRIDE, OMAR V. UNITED STATES 95-8162 PRIORE, FRANK V. UNITED STATES 95-8163 SCOTT, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES 95-8164 TAMAKLOE, WILLIE V. UNITED STATES 95-8165 TRUEBLOOD, DON V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 95-8169 HUFSTETLER, DARRELL W. V. UNITED STATES 95-8170 GARCIA, JUAN B. V. UNITED STATES 95-8171 ESCAMILLA, MOISES V. UNITED STATES 95-8172 ELLIOTT, AMOS V. UNITED STATES 95-8173 FERRER, NICK V. UNITED STATES 95-8174 HART, WILLIAM L. V. UNITED STATES 95-8175 HUTCHING, JAMES N. V. UNITED STATES 95-8176 GOLB, BURTON P. V. UNITED STATES 95-8178 McKENZIE, LOUIA A. V. UNITED STATES 95-8179 NOLAN, JAMES T. V. UNITED STATES 95-8180 JACKSON, LEON V. UNITED STATES 95-8184 WATTS, VERNON V. UNITED STATES 95-8185 URENA-VASQUEZ, MARZELINO V. UNITED STATES 95-8186 THOMAS, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 95-8187 USRY, BARTO E. V. UNITED STATES 95-8194 COLEMAN, MARK A. V. HOFBAUER, WARDEN The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 95-1190 McCLARAN, JOYCE, ETC. V. DAVIS, PATRICIA, ET AL.  r5:#  The motion of respondents for leave to proceed in  r5$  forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 95-1205 IDAHO V. LANKFORD, BRYAN STUART '0*((Ԍ r5  The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in  r5N  forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 95-1219 NEWMAN, GEORGE V. CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a seaman is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 95-1221 HYMAN, JOSEPH V. VA DEPT. OF TAXATION The motion of M. Patton Echols, Jr. and Barbara B. Tanes to be substituted in place of Joseph B. Hyman, deceased, is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.  s5O , MANDAMUS DENIED ă 95-7358 IN RE DONALD BALLARD, ET UX. The petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.  s5 + REHEARINGS DENIED ă 95-630 BAIRD, FRANK V. UNITED STATES 95-934 JOHNSON, DONALD EDGAR V. JOHNSON, RICHARD, ET AL. 95-6957 HALSTEAD, JAMES D. V. FLORIDA, ET AL. 95-7006 IN RE ROBERT CALVIN CRAIG 95-7120 HERNANDEZ, ALEXANDER V. NEW MEXICO, ET AL. The petitions for rehearing are denied.  s5G! ) MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION ă The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: