ÿWPC· ûÿ2Ó%B ZgÁ ÑCourierCourier BoldCourier ObliqueApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<hhhhðT ÑeX@#|d,xûÿ2XX]µ<ÿÿr5ddd°ÈäŒdþ6X@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿzÿÿs4ddd°ÃåŒdÐ `É“Kô€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿöÿÿr5ddd°¼Œdô6NßhÉ[÷KôHþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:•p•p•p•p\\·™„Q„Q„QtUtUtUtUzGzGzG•p•p•p•p•p•p´bpXpXpX########################################HJÔ s4 Ôà ÃÐÐÄ Äà Ã(ORDER LIST: 516 U.S.) Ä Ä Ô s5œ ÔÁàÒì)Áà ÃORDER IN PENDING CASEÄ Äƒ Ô s5ì ÔÁà ì(Áà ÃFRIDAY, MARCH 15, 1996Ä Äƒ à à Ô s4Š Ô95©386Ä ÄÁ` ` Áà ÃRICHARDS, JASON, ET AL. V. JEFFERSON COUNTY, ET AL.Ä ÄÁxxNÁ ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁ$Á The writ of certiorari is dismissed as ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ Áimprovidently granted to the extent that it ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ Áincludes the question whether the occupational ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ Átax challenged by petitioners violates the Equal ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁProtection Clause of the United States Constitution. ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁThe parties are directed to address at oral argument ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ Áonly the remaining question: whether the Due Process ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁClause of the United States Constitution prohibits the Ô r5H Ô ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ Áapplication of ÃÃres judicataÄÄ in this case.