яWPCµ  
     ыя 2 С    %   B    Z   g       Б        С   Courier Courier Bold Courier Oblique Apple LaserWriter IINT               APLASIIN.PRS &d  ЄH    @Ћ —<  hhhhрJ™X@ #| d          ыя 2      X    X   [      і            <яяr 5 d d d °   ИдЊd ю6X   @Й ьK  ф@юююююююяяяяяяюяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяzяяs 4 d d d °  ГеЊd Р    `Й “K  фЂюююююююяюяяяяяяюяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяцяяr 5 d d d °  јЊd ф6NЯ hЙ [чK  фHюююююююяяяяяюяяюяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяяя\·            pp·     %G           ·  =Сooeeѓ3 o <<eeeѓЌ ѓѓoµµooї          I  o2—#                     #######################################                  H   J     Ф  s 4    ФР
  И § 
 РГГ  (ORDER LIST: 516 U.S.)ДД


Ф  s 5 х Ф                        ГГMONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1995ДД


Ф  s 5 л Ф                      ГГAPPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONДД

  95-177    BROOKS, TYRONE, ET AL. V. GEORGIA, ET AL.

                     The judgment is affirmed. Justice Stevens, Justice

                Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would

                vacate the April 4, 1995, District Court dismissal order

                and remand the case for further consideration in light

                of the United States' withdrawal of its appeal.


Ф  s 5 \ Ф                    ГГCERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONДД

  94©1412   FUENTES, JOSEFA V. UNITED STATES

                     The petition for rehearing is granted. The order

                entered May 30, 1995, denying the petition for a writ

                of certiorari is vacated. The petition for a writ of 

                certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the 

                case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals 

                for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light 

Ф  r 5 Н Ф                of ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnitedДД ГГStatesДД, 516 U.S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-1432   LOPEZ, ROLANDO V. UNITED STATES

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for

Ф  r 5 S Ф                further consideration in light of ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnitedДД

Ф  r 5 Ў  Ф                ГГStatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-7820   JONES, GREGORY L. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 =# Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ‹$ Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ф   О'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 N Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8607   ARROYO, HECTOR LUIS V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 к Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 8 Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Second Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 p
 Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8730   BAENA-GABRIEL, EPIFANIO V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5  Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 Z Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 ’ Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8893   PEREZ-VALDEZ, VICTOR M. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 . Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 | Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 ґ Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8765   JAMES, TWAN J. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 P Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ћ  Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 Ц% Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8811   HAWTHORNE, TRENT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊФ  r 5    Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 N Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 † Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-8972   ESTRADA, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 "	 Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 p
 Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 Ё Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-9004   BRAWNER, TYRONE E. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 D Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ’ Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration

Ф  r 5 К Ф                in light of ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-9022   MORTON, LEON D. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 f Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ґ Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 м! Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-9127   ROBINSON, ARTHUR W. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 €$ Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 Ц% Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration

Ф  r 5 њ Ф                in light of ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  94-9365   OLSEN, RAYMOND MARK V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 8 Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 † Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 ѕ Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).


  94-9648   WILCOX, DENNIS A. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 Ё Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ц Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 . Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-190    KNAPP, DAVID, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

                     The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

                The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

                United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for

Ф  r 5 ґ Ф                further consideration in light of ГГGaudinДД v. ГГUnitedДД

Ф  r 5  Ф                ГГStatesДД, 514 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-5200   GRANTHAM, DONALD F. V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 ћ  Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 м! Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 $' Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ  95-5419   ROSS, JAMES V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 N Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 њ Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 Ф Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-5473   BROWN, THEODIE V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 p
 Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 ѕ Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 ц Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-5572   BONNER, ALVIN V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 ’ Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 а Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5  Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-5822   MARIETTE, CARL V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 ґ Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5  Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari

                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Second Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 :# Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).

  95-5827   LANIER, ISAAC V. UNITED STATES

Ф  r 5 Ц% Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 $' Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД and the petition for a writ of certiorari
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is

                remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

                Second Circuit for further consideration in light of

Ф  r 5 к Ф                ГГBaileyДД v. ГГUnited StatesДД, 516 U. S. ГГ    ДД (1995).


Ф  s 5 † Ф                         ГГORDERS IN PENDING CASESДД

  A©410 Б`	`	 БFIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST, ET AL. V. COMPTROLLER OF THEБР Р T ББ(#(#Z БђБ ББ`	`	 Б  CURRENCY          

                     The application for stay addressed to Justice

                Ginsburg and referred to the Court is denied.БxxN ББР Р T Б 

  D-1586    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN STEVEN GLASSMAN

                     John Steven Glassman, of Tacoma, Washington, having

                been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by

                order of September 13, 1995; and a rule having been

                issued, and served upon him requiring him to show cause

                why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a

                response having expired;

                     It is ordered that John Steven Glassman is

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1591    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT F. ZOCCOLA

                     Robert F. Zoccola, of Carmel, Indiana, having

                requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this

                Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the

                roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before

                this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October

                30, 1995, is discharged.

  D-1622    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES EDWARD LYNCH

                     James Edward Lynch, of Washington Crossing,

                Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in

                this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40

                days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be

                disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.Ф   М'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ™  D-1623    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONALD MYERS

                     Donald Myers, of Elizabeth, New Jersey, is

                suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

                rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

                him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

                the practice of law in this Court.

  D-1624    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD JESSE WEISS

                     Howard Jesse Weiss, of New York, New York, is

                suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

                rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

                him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

                the practice of law in this Court.

  M©27      ANNIE L. BAULDWIN V. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, ET AL.

  M©28      MARCO ANTONIO PEREZ V. CHARLES D. MARSHALL, JR., ET AL.

  M©29      DIONICIO ANTHONY CRUZ V. UNITED STATES

                     The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions

                for writs of certiorari out©of©time are denied.

  105 ORIG. KANSAS V. COLORADO

                     The motion of the Special Master for fees and

                reimbursement of expenses for the period August 1, 

                1994, through November 1, 1995, is granted and the

                Special Master is awarded to total of $39,132.75 to 

                be paid as follows:  for the period August 1, 1994,
              
                through July 31, 1995, a total of $21,518.19 to be

                paid 40% by Kansas, 40% by Colorado and 20% by the

                United States; for the period August 1, 1995, through

                November 1, 1995, a total of $17,614.56 to be paid
 
                equally by Kansas and Colorado.

  108 ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING, ET AL.

                     The motion of the Special Master for compensation

                and reimbursement of expenses is granted and the Special
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                Master is awarded a total of $71,399.00 for the period 

                October 1, 1994, through November 17, 1995, to be paid

                as follows:  30% by Nebraska, 30% by Wyoming, 15% by

                Colorado, and 25% by the United States.

  120 ORIG. NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK

                     The motion of the Special Master for compensation

                and reimbursement of expenses is granted and the Special

                Master is awarded a total of $81,649.50 for the period

                June 1, 1995, through November 17, 1995, to be paid

                equally by the parties.

  121 ORIG. LOUISIANA V. MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.

                     The motion of the Special Master for allowance

                of fee and disbursements is granted and the Special

                Master is awarded a total of $156,577.09 to be paid

                in full by Louisiana.

  94-1614)  WISCONSIN V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.
         )
  94-1631)  OKLAHOMA V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.

  94-1985)  DEPT. OF COMMERCE, ET AL. V. NEW YORK, ET AL.

                     The motion of Oklahoma and Wisconsin for divided

                argument is granted in part and the time is divided as

                follows: the Solicitor General 20 minutes; Wisconsin -

                10 minutes; respondents - 30 minutes. The request for

                additional time for oral argument is denied.

  94-1664)  KOON, STACEY V. UNITED STATES
         )
  94-8842)  POWELL, LAURENCE M. V. UNITED STATES

                     The motion of petitioner Stacey Koon for divided

                argument is denied. The motion of petitioner Laurence

                Powell for divided argument is granted and the time is

                divided as follows: petitioner Koon - 15 minutes;

                petitioner Powell - 15 minutes.

  95-737    ROYCE LABORATORIES, INC. V. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB, ET AL.
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                     The motion of petitioner to expedite consideration

                of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

                Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or

                decision of this motion.

  95-5207   COOPER, BYRON KEITH V. OKLAHOMA

                     The motion of National Association of Criminal

Ф  r 5 Ф Ф                Defense Lawyers for leave to file a brief as ГГamicusДД

Ф  r 5 "	 Ф                ГГcuriaeДД is granted.

  95-6383   SIMS, NATHANIEL V. BARKLEY, SUPT., ET AL.

Ф  r 5 ѕ Ф                     The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5  Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is

                allowed until January 2, 1996, within which to pay the

                docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a

                petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this

                Court.


Ф  s 5 а Ф                            ГГCERTIORARI DENIEDДД

  94-2053   NELSON, WAYNE, ET AL. V. MURPHY, WILLIAM, ETC., ET AL.

  95-179    MAYORGA-PEREZ, JOSE V. INS

  95-211    QUINN, MARTIN, ET AL. V. PITOFSKY, CHAIR, FTC, ET AL.

  95-226    HAVERSAT, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

  95-349    SIGUEL, EDWARD V. ALLSTATE LIFE INS., CO.

  95-385    BRAM, DONALD V. CLEVELAND, OH, ET AL.

  95-422    O'NEILL, EDWIN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

  95-425    PRO-ECO, INC. V. BD. OF COMMRS., JAY CTY., IN

  95-426    DENNEY, CAROL RUTH V. REGENTS, UNIV. OF CA, ET AL.

  95-518    IZUMI V. U. S. PHILIPS CORP., ET AL.

  95-525    UNITED STATES V. TURECAMO OF SAVANNAH, INC.

  95-543    CLARK, E. L. V. FANCHER, DERRELL, ET AL.

  95-570    AFRICAN ENTERPRISE, INC. V. SCHOLES, STEVEN, ETC.

  95-574    OLIVO, JOSE V. MAPP, DAVID
Ф   М'	         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ  95-575    RIGGAN, THURMAN, ET AL. V. ST. PAUL, AK

  95-577    SANTA ANA, CA, ET AL. V. LAMBERT, BARBARA, ET AL.

  95-594    ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE V. HOUSTON, FRANCES, ET AL.

  95-598    STOUTENBOROUGH, T., ET AL. V. NFL, ET AL.

  95-602    WATSON, FREDERICK V. TREPEL, ANTHONY, ET AL.

  95-604    LONG COVE CLUB ASSOC. V. HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC

  95-605    OK ASSN./EQUITABLE TAXATION V. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

  95-612    KIMPEL, TONI D. V. ALABAMA

  95-623    WALKER, HUBBARD L. V. INDIANA, ET AL.

  95-629    HEGARTY, JOHN V. WRIGHT, GARY, ET AL.

  95-634    LOVELL, MARY ANN V. PLANTERS BANK & TRUST

  95-639    FLINN, GENE V. PLUMMER, LAWRENCE

  95-686    HEGLER, JAMES V. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-703    CITIZENS ASSN. FOR ENERGY V. BOLTZ, DAVID, ET UX.

  95-732    WILLEY, DOYLE V. UNITED STATES

  95-736    ROLLER, RICKIE V. UNITED STATES

  95-5816   FUENTES, JOSEPH M. V. UNITED STATES

  95-5927   KEISER, RONALD V. UNITED STATES

  95-6309   NONNETTE, NARVIS G. V. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6311   AURELIA N. V. SANTA CLARA CTY. FAMILY SER.

  95-6314   WILLIAMS, FRANK V. ARKANSAS

  95-6321   LOVE, ROBERT E. V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6335   BURNSIDE, DARRELL JEROME V. SGT. LATTIMORE, ET AL.

  95-6336   BOGAN, CLAUDE EDWARD V. NAGLE, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6337   BRYANT, JAMES V. SC DOC, ET AL.

  95-6338   QUINNIEY, MELVIN V. NEW YORK

  95-6341   LYLE, ROGER L. V. RICHARDSON, GLORIA

  95-6347   GORDON, CRAIG A. V. PEORIA SCHOOL DIST., ET AL.

  95-6350   HARRISON, ALFONSO V. OKLAHOMA, ET AL.

  95-6351   PAYNE, JOHN M. V. LOVE, WILLIAM, SUPT.

  95-6352   JENKINS, ANTHONY R. V. McKUNE, WARDEN
Ф   Л'
         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ  95-6365   NELSON, ROBERT F. V. CASWELL, JANET

  95-6366   NAIL, JOE V. OKLAHOMA

  95-6372   SUTTLES, DWIGHT V. HIGHTOWER, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6376   BREEDLOVE, McARTHUR V. FLORIDA

  95-6390   SPEARS, BRIAN V. OKLAHOMA

  95-6431   BROWN, VERNON V. MISSOURI

  95-6448   FERENC, JOHN M. V. REINOSA, DR., ET AL.

  95-6507   MAYES, PAUL A. V. NEWBERRY, WARDEN

  95-6550   MILLS, SHELIA V. JONES, WARDEN

  95-6557   SINGLETARY, JEROME V. SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6565   SO-FINE, LAKIM V. MORTON, ADMINISTRATOR

  95-6569   WILKERSON, ROSS V. MOSLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6587   HAMBRICK, EDDIE V. THOMAS, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-6664   WOODS, JESSE V. UNITED STATES

  95-6666   RAMIREZ, ADAM V. UNITED STATES

  95-6668   HOOD, ROBERT L. V. PHILLIPS, DIRECTOR

  95-6671   HILL, TONY V. JOHNSON, WARDEN

  95-6672   KEY, ALLISON V. UNITED STATES

  95-6674   ANGEL, LUIS V. UNITED STATES

  95-6676   ZAJAC, TERRY V. UNITED STATES

  95-6678   BISHOP, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES

  95-6681   RODRIGUEZ, GERALDO V. UNITED STATES

  95-6682   ROBERSON, GARY LEE V. UNITED STATES

  95-6686   WHITIS, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES

  95-6691   BROWN, ISAIAH V. UNITED STATES

  95-6692   BATTISTE, CLARENCE V. UNITED STATES

  95-6694   WILLIAMS, EDWARD R. V. UNITED STATES

  95-6695   JOHNSON, PETER, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

  95-6696   MATTHEWS, DION V. UNITED STATES

  95-6730   NELSON, SHARON L. V. McKINNA, SUPT., ET AL.

  95-6757   PALACIOS-BASTIDA, MAXIMINO V. UNITED STATES
Ф   Л'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ                     The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

  95-393    HELLER, DAVID V. BOWMAN, SYLVIA SMITH

                     The motion of Association for Union Democracy for

Ф  r 5 к Ф                leave to file a brief as ГГamicus curiaeДД is granted. The

                petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

  95-616    CALDERON, WARDEN, ET AL. V. PHILLIPS, RICHARD

  95-633    MICHIGAN V. SANDERS, RICO ARNEZ

Ф  r 5 "	 Ф                     The motions of respondents for leave to proceed ГГinДД

Ф  r 5 p
 Ф                ГГforma pauperisДД are granted. The petitions for writs of

                certiorari are denied.


Ф  s 5 Z Ф                             ГГMANDAMUS DENIEDДД

  95-6371   IN RE RODNEY WILLIAMS

  95-6644   IN RE ANTHONY SOLIMINE

                     The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.


Ф  s 4 б ФГГ                            REHEARINGS DENIED
ДД
  94-9227   LAPSLEY, BYRON V. NORTHERN IN PUBLIC SERVICE

  94-9253   IN RE ROBERT SHEEHY

  94-9613   WASHINGTON, MARVIN V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.

  94-9783   FELIX-SANTOS, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES

  95-223    CINCINNATI INS. CO. V. ORANGEBURG SAUSAGE CO.

  95-312    ROUSSIN, WILLIAM V. MISSOURI

  95-333    JULIEN, ARCHIE V. TEXAS, ET AL.

  95-406    IN RE PAUL DANKO

  95-5145   MYERS, DALE V. UNITED STATES

  95-5191   THIERMAN, JONATHAN H. V. THIERMAN, NANCY J., ET AL.

  95-5282   BERGMANN, JOHN S. V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-5510   STEWART, CARL V. BROWN, SEC., VET. AFFAIRS

  95-5585   CRAWFORD, JOHNNY V. GARNER, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-5773   OSBORNE, JAMES V. MONTGOMERY ENGINEERING
Ф   М'         0*Б(Б(°°  ФЊ  95-5796   GRAHAM, RONALD V. HANNIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

  95-5933   KENT, CHARLES A. V. REICH, SEC. OF LABOR

  95-6113   KIDSTON, CAMERON V. STIBBARDS, J. E.

  95-6204   IN RE ROBERT M. BONTA

  95-6236   IN RE JOSEPH LANZON

  95-6237   IN RE SEAN E. JORY

  95-6243   IN RE LLOYD R. DEERE

  95-6257   IN RE TYRONE WALKER

  95-6301   IN RE SON V. HOANG

  95-6305   IN RE BRUCE C. LANE

  95-6306   IN RE CHARLES V. MAIDA

                     The petitions for rehearing are denied.

  94-9755   SANBORN, PARRAMORE LEE V. KENTUCKY

                     The motion for leave to file a petition for

                rehearing is denied.


Ф  s 5 9 Ф                          ГГMOTIONS FOR ADMISSIONДД

                     The written motions for admission of the following

                lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: