ÿWPCµ ûÿ2Ñ%B ZgÁÑCourierCourier BoldCourier ObliqueApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<hhhhð5"§X@#|dûÿ2XX[³Tÿÿr5ddd°ÈäŒdþ6X@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ’ÿÿs4ddd°ÃåŒdÐ `É“Kô€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿr5ddd°¼Œdô6NßhÉ[÷KôHþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:•p•p•p•p\\·™„Q„Q„QtUtUtUtUzGzGzG•p•p•p•p•p•p´bpXpXpX########################################HJÔ s4 ÔРȧ Ðà à ORDER LIST MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1995 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES Ä Ä A©371 LEMOND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V. RICHARD WHEELER The application for a stay of the execution of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama, case No. 1930866, entered on September 29, 1995, presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is granted pending the timely filing and disposition by this Court of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay terminates automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, this stay shall continue pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. A©377 OWEN©ILLINOIS CORPORATION V. MONTY J. REKDAHL, ET AL. The application for a stay of the execution of the judgment of the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three, case No. B068259, entered on May 25, 1995, presented to Justice O'Connor and by her referred to the Court is granted pending the timely filing and disposition by this Court of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay terminates automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, this stay shall continue pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court. D-1585 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER PALMISANO Joseph Christopher Palmisano, of Scottsdale, Arizona, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of September 1, 1995; and a ruleÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Joseph Christopher Palmisano is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1602 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS E. BRYANT, JR. Thomas E. Bryant, Jr., of Mobile, Alabama, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1603 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PHILLIP E. SHAPIRO Phillip E. Shapiro, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1604 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE EDWARD CARSON George Edward Carson, of Jackson, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1605 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NORMAN EDELL Norman Edell, of Los Angeles, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1606 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RANDALL EUGENE SMITH Randall Eugene Smith, of Bradenton, Florida, is ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1607 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES T. MORRISON, JR. Charles T. Morrison, Jr., of Los Angeles, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1608 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEVEN E. HEATH Steven E. Heath, of Bradley Beach, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1609 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARL C. HENDRICKS, JR. Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., of Beaufort, South Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1610 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF S. PATRICK PHILLIPS S. Patrick Phillips, of Bossier City, Louisiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. M©19 BENJAMIN BREWER V. RON WARD, WARDEN Ô r5Ö% Ô The motion for leave to proceed ÃÃin forma pauperisÄÄ without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ is denied. Justice Stevens, Justice Kennedy, Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer would grant the motion. M©20 CHARLES R. KENDALL, JR. V. CITY OF TACOMA The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 94-896 BMW OF N. AM., INC. V. GORE, IRA The motion of petitioner for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument is granted. The motion of respondent for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument is granted. 94-923 ) SHAW, RUTH, ET AL. V. HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. ) 94-924 ) POPE, ART, ET AL. V. HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. The motion of appellants James Arthur Pope, et al. for divided argument is granted. The motion of appellees for divided argument is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument is granted. The time is divided as follows: appellants Ruth Shaw, et al. - 30 minutes; appellants James Arthur Pope, et al. - 10 minutes; appellees James B. Hunt, Jr., et al. - 20 minutes; appellees Ralph Gingles, et al. - 10 minutes; the Solicitor General - 10 minutes. 94-1654 HEISER, GLEN, ET AL. V. UMBEHR, KEEN The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to Ô r5ì! Ô participate in oral argument as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ and for divided argument is granted. 94-9088 NEAL, MEIRL G. V. UNITED STATES The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Donald Thomas Bergerson, Esquire, ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ of San Francisco, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case. 95-5906 ATTWOOD, ROBERT V. DR. SMITH, ET AL. Ô r5ê Ô The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ÃÃin Ô r58 Ô forma pauperisÄÄ is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until November 27, 1995, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. 95-5907 ATTWOOD, ROBERT V. PALM BEACH POST, ET AL. Ô r5 Ô The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ÃÃin Ô r5Z Ô forma pauperisÄÄ is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until November 27, 1995, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Ô s4. Ôà à CERTIORARI GRANTED Ä Ä 95-210 HOLLY FARMS CORP., ET AL. V. NLRB, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 5 presented by the petition. 95-5257 ORNELAS, SAUL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES Ô r5´ Ô The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ÃÃin Ô r5 Ô forma pauperisÄÄ and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. 95-5661 MELENDEZ, JUAN V. UNITED STATES Ô r5:# Ô The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ÃÃin Ô r5ˆ$ Ô forma pauperisÄÄ and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°Ԍà Ù CERTIORARI DENIED Ä Ä 95-88 EDWARDS, JESSE V. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR 95-193 JOLICOEUR FURNITURE CO. V. BALDELLI, CHARLES, ET AL. 95-370 ATCHLEY, MARGARET V. SMITH, BILL, ET AL. 95-372 ) SWANSON, NORMAN, ET AL. V. FAULKNER, JANICE, ET AL. ) 95-373 ) HOMESLEY, RAY, ET AL. V. FAULKNER, JANICE, ET AL. 95-387 LEWIS, JENNIFER LAYNE V. GEORGIA 95-391 WOOD, EVELYN, ET AL. V. WASH, MICHAEL, ET AL. 95-400 NUMMER, DAVID V. MI DEPT. OF TREASURY 95-409 PROMETHEUS FUNDING, ET AL. V. MERCHANTS HOME DEL. SERV. 95-412 SHAW, GINA V. HAHN, JAMES, ET AL. 95-416 SEABOLT, JAMES V. TEXAS 95-421 MALEKZADEH, MOHAMMED V. TEXAS 95-423 JOHNSON, LILLIAN V. ST. BAR OF CA 95-429 BROWN, SHARON V. ODOM, ROZANNE, ET AL. 95-430 SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION V. STRAUSBERG, BRUCE 95-432 AARON, RONALD, ET AL. V. WICHITA, KS 95-440 HOPEWELL, RICHARD V. DUNKER, WILLIAM, ET AL. 95-502 SPICKLER, ROBERT V. YORK, ROBERT 95-529 ) WATER DIST. NO. 1, ETC. V. KOOPMAN, VINCENT ) 95-5411 ) KOOPMAN, VINCENT V. WATER DIST. NO. 1 95-556 CONF./AFRICAN UNION, ET AL. V. MOTHER AFRICAN UNION, ET AL. 95-5450 LUCKETT, ELOISE V. RENT-A-CENTER, INC., ET AL. 95-5633 HILDWIN, PAUL C. V. FLORIDA, ET AL. 95-5642 JACKSON, MICHAEL A. V. CALIFORNIA 95-5804 FELDER, FREDDIE L. V. MONTAGUE, CLERK, USCA4 95-5847 SIGMAN, GARY V. NEW JERSEY 95-5851 YURTIS, JANE V. PHIPPS, HARVE 95-5865 EAGLIN, KENNETH V. WELBORN, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-5868 KNUCKLES, JOHN C. V. OHIO 95-5869 MONROE, DONALD L. V. FLORIDAÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ 95-5874 NIXON, RONDAL H. V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL. 95-5875 LEE, KENNETH V. PENNSYLVANIA 95-5882 HAMBRICK, EDDIE V. USGAN 95-5883 HULL, ALMA V. V. SIMS, WILLIAM 95-5884 BELL, ALBERT V. DeTELLA, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-5887 WALLACE, CURTIS V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 95-5889 BALLARD, JAMES V. HOLLAND, WARDEN 95-5891 BROWN, MARK V. MAZZOLA, WILLIAM M., ET AL. 95-5892 WEETS, JON D. V. MATLOCK, ROBIN K. 95-5893 VEY, EILEEN V. CASTOR, CHMN., ETC., ET AL. 95-5898 SPIGELSKI, ANNA V. BANASZAK, THEODOSIA 95-5903 DAVIS, MAJOR V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL. 95-5908 ROBERTS, WILLIE DAN V. FLORIDA 95-5909 SHACKLEFORD, PATRICK V. DECKER, JIM, ET AL. 95-5916 BRADY, ELIZABETH C., ET AL. V. BRADY, THOMAS J. 95-5928 JACOB, AL M. V. PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY 95-5933 KENT, CHARLES A. V. REICH, SEC. OF LABOR 95-5935 AUSTIN, ALONZO V. UPSHAW, JUANITA K. 95-5939 DAGGETT, JOHN V. KREBS, LYLE, ET AL. 95-5940 MORRIS, WILLIAM F. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA 95-5941 LOWERY, BYRON V. FLORIDA 95-5947 VALDEZ, GERARDO V. OKLAHOMA 95-5951 COLONEL, HORACE L. V. DEPT. OF HRS, ET AL. 95-5986 REEMSNYDER, ROBERT V. OSHA 95-6025 SPRUILL, LARRY V. MOZELL, WESLEY 95-6033 HICKS, NORRIS V. COLLINS, EXEC. DIR., TX DCJ 95-6078 BENTLEY, ROOSEVELT C. V. ARTUZ, SUPT., GREEN HAVEN 95-6103 TRAUNIG, GERALD W. V. UNITED STATES 95-6106 WARDEN, DAN E., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 95-6114 RICHARDS, MICHAEL ODEL V. WOODS, S. O. 95-6177 MURTON, ANITONI V. INS ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 95-6207 KNIGHT, N. ROBERT V. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 95-6215 BABCOCK, MICHAEL R. V. UNITED STATES 95-6216 BARNES, DYJUAN D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6220 CLARK, JAMES M. V. UNITED STATES 95-6227 CARLOW, DALE V. UNITED STATES 95-6238 LUCERO, EDUARDO M. V. RILEY, SEC. OF EDUCATION 95-6246 DICKEY, BILLY D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6248 HANKINS, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES 95-6249 HOLMES, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 95-6250 GALAVIZ, STEVE V. UNITED STATES 95-6251 HEAVILIN, JAMES G. V. UNITED STATES 95-6252 DODGE, WILLIAM E. V. UNITED STATES 95-6269 CARDENAS, HERNANDO CASTRO V. UNITED STATES 95-6273 GRISWOLD, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES 95-6274 SCOTT, ARNOLD V. UNITED STATES 95-6275 KELLY, TYRONE V. UNITED STATES 95-6276 LOVETT, JOSEPH C. V. UNITED STATES 95-6277 METU, MICHAEL C. V. UNITED STATES 95-6278 RAITPORT, ELI V. DEPARTMENT OF H&HS, ET AL. 95-6279 JACKSON, MICHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6281 RAULERSON, DONALD V. UNITED STATES 95-6283 RODRIGUEZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES 95-6286 D'ANTONI, TODD A. V. UNITED STATES 95-6287 HILL, MARY E. V. UNITED STATES 95-6291 SMITH, ROBERT REE V. UNITED STATES 95-6294 GIL, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATES 95-6296 CHARLES, JUNIUS V. UNITED STATES 95-6297 BUCHANAN, LAWRENCE V. UNITED STATES 95-6298 CINTRON, JUAN RAMON V. UNITED STATES 95-6307 JONES, OTIS M. V. UNITED STATES 95-6308 LINN, RICKY V. UNITED STATES ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 95-6310 ALLEN, BRENT L. V. UNITED STATES 95-6312 ROBERTS, BERTRIL MARK V. UNITED STATES 95-6316 STOVALL, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6317 ReBROOK, WILLIAM E. V. UNITED STATES 95-6319 LINARES-GARCIA, ISIDORO V. UNITED STATES 95-6320 JACKSON, STANLEY B. V. UNITED STATES 95-6322 MOLINA, RODOLFO V. UNITED STATES 95-6323 FORD, DEON D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6325 FEDERICK, TIMOTHY D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6326 HILL, THOMAS C. V. UNITED STATES 95-6328 CERULLO, DAVID BRIAN V. UNITED STATES 95-6329 TORRES-DIAZ, ANDRES G. V. UNITED STATES 95-6330 WASHINGTON, LEROY V. UNITED STATES 95-6331 THOMAS, RYAN V. UNITED STATES 95-6332 THOMAS, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 95-6333 WILLIAMS, RONALD L. V. HENRY, WARDEN 95-6334 PERALTA, SANTIAGO V. UNITED STATES 95-6339 MANLEY, JONATHAN R. V. UNITED STATES 95-6345 DAVIS, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES 95-6346 GILMORE, MARSHALL V. UNITED STATES 95-6357 WOODS, MICHAEL W. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 95-209 JEFFERSON-PILOT LIFE INS. V. WEEMS, WILLARD, ET UX. The motion of Business Council of Alabama for leave Ô r5P Ô to file a brief as ÃÃamicus curiaeÄÄ is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 95-453 LUTHER, JOE MICHAEL V. ETHICON, INC., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 95-6272 GALLAHER, PETER K. V. UNITED STATES ÔË' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ The motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Ô s4Ô Ôà à HABEAS CORPUS DENIED Ä Ä 95-6392 IN RE ROGER L. CAMYN The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Ô s4 Ôà à MANDAMUS DENIED Ä Ä 95-5910 IN RE EDWARD SACK The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. 95-5905 O'LEARY, IN RE JOHN O'LEARY The petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied. Ô s4. Ôà à REHEARINGS DENIED Ä Ä 94-9250 ROBERSON, CLEVEN LEWIS V. CHATER, COMMR., SOCIAL SEC. 94-9279 BOND, MERTON V. O'DEA, WARDEN 95-5202 GLANT, SUSAN K. V. LAMB, JOHN, ET AL. The petitions for rehearing are denied. Ô s5 ÔÁà”ì-Áà ÃRECESS ORDERÄ Äƒ The Court will take a recess from Monday, November 13, 1995, until Monday, November 27, 1995. Ô s4‰$ Ôà à MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION Ä Ä The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: ÔÌ' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ