ÿWPCµ ûÿ2Ñ%B ZgÁÑCourierCourier BoldCourier ObliqueApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<hhhhð!{‚X@#|dûÿ2XX[³Tÿÿr5ddd°ÈäŒdþ6X@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ’ÿÿs4ddd°ÃåŒdÐ `É“Kô€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿr5ddd°¼Œdô6NßhÉ[÷KôHþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ—<,\,ð‰ 7OX@ûÿ2ÿÿ> ZN¨X¨#|d########################################HJÔ s5 ÔРȧ Ð Ã Ã(ORDER LIST: 519 U.S)Ä Ä Ô s5ö Ô Ã ÃMONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1997Ä Ä Ô s5ì Ô Ã ÃCERTIORARI--SUMMARY DISPOSITIONÄ Ä 95-586 WISCONSIN, ET AL. V. MUELLER, GERALD, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Ô r5s Ô for further consideration in light of ÃÃSeminole Tribe ofÄÄ Ô r5Á Ô ÃÃFloridaÄÄ v. ÃÃFloridaÄÄ, 517 U. S. ___ (1996). 95-1415 SABELKO, KATHERINE, ET AL. V. PHOENIX, AZ, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for Ô r5G Ô further consideration in light of ÃÃSchenckÄÄ v. ÃÃPro-ChoiceÄÄ Ô r5• Ô ÃÃNetwork of Western New YorkÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 95-1509 LUZIK, DOUGLAS, ET AL. V. VIRGINIA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Virginia, City of Richmond, for further Ô r5 Ô consideration in light of ÃÃAuerÄÄ v. ÃÃRobbinsÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 95-1905 HILL, LEILA, ET AL. V. COLORADO, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Colorado for further consideration Ô r5ï! Ô in light of ÃÃSchenckÄÄ v. ÃÃPro-Choice Network of Western NewÄÄ Ô r5=# Ô ÃÃYorkÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 95-1981 GNADT, MARY ANNA V. CASTRO, ERNEST, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the ÔÎ'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Ô r5N Ô for further consideration in light of ÃÃRobinsonÄÄ v. ÃÃShellÄÄ Ô r5œ Ô ÃÃOil CompanyÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 95-2088 DENVER, CO V. C. KELLY CARPENTER, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for Ô r5" Ô further consideration in light of ÃÃAuerÄÄ v. ÃÃRobbinsÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 95-6825 MAGNOTTI, JOSEPH C. V. SINGLETARY, DIR., FL DOC Ô r5 Ô The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed ÃÃinÄÄ Ô r5Z Ô ÃÃforma pauperisÄÄ and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Ô r5’ Ô ÃÃLynceÄÄ v. ÃÃMathisÄÄ, 519 U. S. ___ (1997). 96-152 GIULIANI, MAYOR, NY, ET AL. V. YOURMAN, HAROLD, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Ô r5 Ô for further consideration in light of ÃÃAuerÄÄ v. ÃÃRobbins,ÄÄ 519 U. S. ___ (1997). Ô s5 Ô Ã ÃORDERS IN PENDING CASESÄ Ä M©60 LOUIS REED, JR. V. HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out©of©time is denied. 96-987 FOREMAN, B. C., ET AL., V. DALLAS CTY, TX, ET AL. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. 96-1266 PEREZ, JOSE ANTONIO V. UNITED STATESÔÌ'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ™ The motion of petitioner to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 96-7233 BOWERS, BRENDA J., ET AL. V. SATURN GENERAL MOTORS CORP. Ô r5ê Ô The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed ÃÃinÄÄ Ô r58 Ô ÃÃforma pauperisÄÄ is denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 17, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Ô s5¾ Ô Ã ÃCERTIORARI GRANTEDÄ Ä 96-643 STEEL CO., ETC. V. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRON. 96-792 KALINA, LYNNE V. FLETCHER, RODNEY The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. 96-738 SALINAS, MARIO V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 2 and 3 presented by the petition. 96-843 ) NATL. CREDIT UNION ADMIN. V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST ) 96-847 ) AT&T FAMILY CREDIT UNION V. FIRST NATL. BANK & TRUST The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Ô s5µ Ô ÃÃÄÄà ÃCERTIORARI DENIEDÄ Ä 95-1360 WEBB, CLINTON, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 95-2060 HADLEY, LES V. N. AR COMMUNITY TECH. COLL. 96-652 KUCHINSKAS, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. BROWARD CO., FL 96-806 QASGUARGIS, RAAD V. INS 96-821 JONATHAN WOODNER CO., ET AL. V. BREEDEN, FRANCISCA, ET AL. 96-834 JENSEN, ALDERIC, ET UX. V. LOS ANGELES, CA 96-841 UAP/GA AG CHEM., INC., ET AL V. CHILDREE, DENISE 96-873 TSIMBIDAROS, APOSTOLOS V. IBOP, ET AL. ÔÍ'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 96-883 PARKER, SANDRA, ETC., ET AL. V. BOYER, RODNEY, ET AL. 96-903 ) AR TERM LIMITS, ET AL V. DONOVAN, EUGENIA ) 96-919 ) ARKANSAS V. DONOVAN, EUGENIA, ET AL. 96-905 TULSA, OK V. SPRADLING, B. N., ET AL. 96-906 LOHMAN, JANETTE, ET AL. V. HAFLEY, EVELYN SUSAN 96-931 GRANTWOOD VILLAGE V. MO PACIFIC RR CO., ET AL. 96-946 FORDHAM, LAURENCE V. MA BAR COUNSEL 96-990 HUDSON, FELTON, ET AL. V. DELTA AIR LINES, ET AL. 96-991 CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE, ET AL V. MONTGOMERY, ATTY. GEN. OF OH 96-992 ALBINO, LOUELLA, ET AL. V. MACHADO, COLETTE, ET AL. 96-994 BRINE, PAULINE, ET AL. V. IA BD. OF REGENTS, ET AL. 96-995 CHANCE MGMT., INC., ET AL. V. SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. 96-997 JONATHAN WOODNER CO., ET AL. V. BREEDEN, FRANCISCA, ET AL. 96-1010 CROSSLEY, LARRY V. LIBERTY BANK & TRUST, ET AL. 96-1014 UNION UNDERWEAR CO., INC. V. WILSON, ELIZABETH 96-1020 PLAINVIEW-OLD BETHPAGE SCH. V. DONATO, LINDA 96-1021 IL HIGH SCH. ASSN. V. GTE VANTAGE INC. 96-1035 BENDER SHIPBLDG. & REPAIR V. JARRELL, ANTHONY 96-1039 REDGE, ANTHONY V. MICHIGAN 96-1042 SIMMONS, WENDELL, ET AL. V. SAFECO INSURANCE CO., ETC. 96-1045 GILL, PATRICIA V. DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS 96-1077 ILLINOIS V. YARBER, SAMUEL 96-1078 WILEY, CHARLES V. GMC 96-1086 RANDALL, WILLIE C. V. UNITED STATES 96-1088 GEISER, ELIZABETH V. MATHEW, RONDA, ET AL. 96-1100 WARWICK MALL TRUST, ET AL. V. RHODE ISLAND, ET AL. 96-1118 PIEVSKY, MAX V. RIDGE, GOV. OF PA 96-1132 WILSON, JOAN, ET AL. V. MASSACHUSETTS 96-1153 POLY-TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. V. INSTY*BIT, INC. 96-1159 PITTSBURGH V. BECK, ROBERT 96-1162 COCHRAN, DAVID V. UNITED STATES ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 96-1166 LARRY, JULIUS V. PHILLIPS, THOMAS, ET AL. 96-1175 GABEL, RICHARD V. CIR 96-1191 HUGHES, RONALD V. UNITED STATES 96-1196 DAMICO, MARCO V. UNITED STATES 96-1228 BIDDULPH, DAVE, ET AL. V. MORTHAM, SEC. OF ST. OF FL 96-6614 ALEXANDER, VERNELL V. CHATER, COMMR., SOCIAL SEC. 96-6791 HALL, WAINSWORTH M. V. UNITED STATES 96-6822 BECERRA, FRANCISCO B. V. DALTON, SEC. OF NAVY 96-6830 ROWSEY, RAYMOND DAYLE V. NORTH CAROLINA 96-6868 BURGOS, FRANK KAHLED V. UNITED STATES 96-6966 CHARLTON, ANN MERY V. PARAMUS BD. OF ED., ET AL. 96-7134 McGILL, BERNARD V. PENNSYLVANIA 96-7163 CARTER, ROBERT EARL V. TEXAS 96-7180 JONES, LEO A. V. FLORIDA 96-7190 MILLER, DON J. V. ARIZONA 96-7198 TAYLOR, MICHAEL V. MISSOURI 96-7202 WELLS, ROBERT S. V. GOMEZ, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL. 96-7203 YORK, ERMA J. V. ARKANSAS 96-7204 WHITE, DAVID C. V. ADAMS COUNTY DETENTION FAC. 96-7205 BURNETT, JEFFERY R. V. BULSON, DAVID E. 96-7206 CLEMONS, FREDERICK V. RANEY, WARDEN 96-7207 BOULINEAU, RONNIE M. V. WEST, SEC. OF ARMY, ET AL. 96-7208 BATICADOS, AMADO H. V. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL. 96-7210 CARILLO, JOHN V. TEXAS 96-7216 DURHAM, SANDRA V. FLORIDA 96-7219 MARK, MARVIN E. V. CALIFORNIA 96-7228 SMITH, BRIAN V. PENNSYLVANIA 96-7231 POWELL, REUBEN V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 96-7232 BARTHOLIC, FRANK G. V. STEWART, DIR., AZ DOC 96-7234 HUSS, LOREN G. V. ACEVEDO, WARDEN 96-7235 JONES, CARL V. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 96-7237 CHEEK, THEODORE L. V. HORN, COMM., PA DOC, ET AL. 96-7239 CROSS, NANCY J. V. MURPHY, MARYANNE Z. 96-7241 KING, WALTER GEORGE V. MICHIGAN 96-7243 CROSS, NANCY J. V. CALIFORNIA 96-7248 VICTOR, CLARENCE V. HOPKINS, WARDEN 96-7287 HYDE, DAVID O. V. ARIZONA 96-7290 FOSTER, JOHN L. V. GIANT FOOD, INC. 96-7333 ROBINSON, BARTHOLOMEW V. VIRGINIA, ET AL. 96-7402 EGUITA, ESTANISLAO A. V. OPM 96-7403 EVERETT, JOHN P. V. BD. OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS 96-7404 COLEMAN, CARLTON V. MORTON, ADMINR., NJ, ET AL. 96-7426 MOSELEY, CARL S. V. NORTH CAROLINA 96-7427 ANTONELLI, MICHAEL C. V. ILLINOIS 96-7436 BRANCATO, DONALD H. V. GRADY, THOMAS C. 96-7452 MOORE, NORMAN J., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 96-7469 HUSSKE, PAUL J. V. VIRGINIA 96-7512 RUPERT, LEROY V. ILLINOIS 96-7529 LENNARTZ, KATHLEEN V. UNITED STATES 96-7530 REYES, ALFREDO C. V. SOLLOSO, JOSE M., ET AL. 96-7570 FOSTER, JOHN L. V. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE 96-7586 MARTINEZ, OSCAR V. UNITED STATES 96-7587 RUSSELL, MARION V. UNITED STATES 96-7594 OGUGUO, ISAAC V. UNITED STATES 96-7596 SCHNEIDER, SCOTT V. UNITED STATES 96-7600 MORRISON, JAMES V. V. UNITED STATES 96-7601 BROCCHINI, DIVO JOHN V. UNITED STATES 96-7610 BETANCOURT, RAFAEL V. UNITED STATES 96-7612 NWOBI, CHRISTOPHER A. V. UNITED STATES 96-7615 CARPENTER, PAUL BRUCE V. UNITED STATES 96-7616 CECCARANI, ANGELO P. V. UNITED STATES 96-7619 COWAN, MICHAEL CLARK V. UNITED STATES ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ 96-7620 ARNOLD, RONALD S. V. UNITED STATES 96-7624 RUIZ, RENAN EDGAR V. UNITED STATES 96-7626 RUNNELS, RICK V. UNITED STATES 96-7627 REVELES-RAMOS, ROBERTO V. UNITED STATES 96-7629 SCOTT, MICHAEL TROY V. UNITED STATES 96-7630 PREVITTE, JERRY WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 96-7632 PALMIERI, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES 96-7633 ALVARADO-DELGADO, JUAN JOSE V. UNITED STATES 96-7634 BUTLER, SEAN V. UNITED STATES 96-7642 LEON, LUIS G. V. UNITED STATES 96-7644 ATCHESON, STEPHEN WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 96-7646 JONES, HUMPHREY V. UNITED STATES 96-7654 EZEOKE, STEPHEN A. V. UNITED STATES 96-7664 COHEN, MARTIN H. V. UNITED STATES 96-7667 WOMACK, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES 96-7668 WEBB, EDGAR W. V. UNITED STATES 96-7678 DANIELS, NORVELL V. UNITED STATES 96-7679 FLUCAS, MITCHELL L. V. UNITED STATES 96-7680 HAWKINS, WILLIE R. V. UNITED STATES 96-7681 DELMARLE, JOHN C. V. UNITED STATES 96-7704 WELKY, DONALD A. V. MAKOWSKI, WARDEN, ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 96-974 HENRY, OTIS V. SHERMAN, TEXAS The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Ô s5á# Ô Ã ÃHABEAS CORPUS DENIEDÄ Ä 96-7380 IN RE JOHN ERIC SANDLES The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. ÔÌ'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒÔ s5 Ô Ã ÃMANDAMUS DENIEDÄ Ä 96-6891 IN RE JOHN SANDLES 96-7475 IN RE VENEITA G. WESLEY The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied. Ô s5‡ Ô Ã ÃREHEARINGS DENIEDÄ Ä 96-662 BANK OF NY, ET AL. V. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 96-780 RUDE, MORREON, ET AL., V. UNITED STATES 96-6271 WILLIAMS, JAMES E. V. NORTH CAROLINA 96-6485 REAPE, HAROLD V. NEW YORK DAILY NEWS 96-6504 STOIANOFF, CARROLL B. V. TRW, INC., ET AL. 96-6723 ANDRZEJEWSKI, BOGUSLAW V. CA WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD 96-6802 VELEZ, FRANK V. PUERTO RICO 96-6804 ARTEAGA, LORENZO V. USDC ND CA 96-6827 GIBBS, CLARK E. V. UNITED STATES 96-6854 RANEY, ARLIN EDWARD V. UNITED STATES 96-6965 KARIM-PANAHI, PARVIZ V. CIR The petitions for rehearing are denied. Ô s5~ Ô Ã ÃATTORNEY DISCIPLINEÄ Ä D-1736 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ELLIOTT L. DU BOIS Elliott L. Du Bois, of Chicago, Illinois, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of October 21, 1996; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Elliott L. Du Bois is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1741 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILBUR DAWKINS ATKINS, JR. Wilbur Dawkins Atkins, Jr., of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 4, 1996; and a ÔÎ'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Wilbur Dawkins Atkins, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1744 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM HERB EBBERT William Herb Ebbert, of Denver, Colorado, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 12, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that William Herb Ebbert is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1750 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KENT FRANCIS JACOBS Kent Francis Jacobs, of Seward, Nebraska, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 2, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Kent Francis Jacobs is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1751 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SAVERIO R. PRINCIPATO Saverio R. Principato, of Camden, New Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 2, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Saverio R. Principato is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. ÔË' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ D-1753 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ANTHONY F. BARONE Anthony F. Barone, of Palm Beach, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 2, 1996; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Anthony F. Barone is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1754 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAY STUART NEDELL Jay Stuart Nedell, of Houston, Texas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 2, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Jay Stuart Nedell is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1755 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN MELVYN SMOTKIN Alan Melvyn Smotkin, of Beverly Hills, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 2, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Alan Melvyn Smotkin is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1757 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACK J. TAFFER Jack J. Taffer, of Miami, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 9, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he ÔË' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Jack J. Taffer is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1760 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES JOHN GOMRIC James John Gomric, of Belleville, Illinois, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of December 16, 1996; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that James John Gomric is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1779 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MILAN KENNETH GREGORY Milan Kenneth Gregory, of Northport, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1780 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RUDOLPH L. MAZZEI Rudolph L. Mazzei, of Port Jefferson, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1781 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONALD D. HAMILTON Donald D. Hamilton, of Lebanon, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. ÔË' 0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ D-1782 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF OSCAR WILLIAM OLSON, JR. Oscar William Olson, Jr., of Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1783 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID LOUIS PASSMAN David Louis Passman, of Chicago, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1784 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD LEVINSON Richard Levinson, of Chicago, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1785 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MUSTAFA ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD Mustafa Abdullah Muhammad, of Chicago, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. Ô s5÷ ÔÁà”ì-Áà ÃRECESS ORDERÄ Äƒ The Court will take a recess from Monday, March 3, 1997, until Monday, March 17, 1997.