|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Correction | EID
Home | Ahead of Print | Past
Issues | EID Search | Contact
Us | Announcements | Suggested
Citation | Submit Manuscript
|
Correction, Vol. 8, No. 12In the article, “Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O128, and O145 from Animals and Humans” by Carl M. Schroeder et al., errors occurred in the figure on page 1412. The corrected figure appears below and online at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol8no12/02-0070.htm. We regret any confusion these errors may have caused.
Figure 2. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance frequencies between Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and other E. coli. Of isolates from cattle, resistance frequencies were similar between STEC and other E. coli (A). In contrast, of isolates from humans, resistance frequencies were generally lower for STEC compared with other E. coli (B). Am, ampicillin; Cx, cefoxitin; C, chloramphenicol; Frx, ceftriaxone; Smx, sulfamethoxazole; Cf, cephalothin; Gm, gentamicin; NA, nalidixic acid; Cip, ciprofloxacin; Fur, ceftiofur; Te, tetracycline; T/S, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; A/C, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; Str, streptomycin. |
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
EID Home | Top of Page | Ahead-of-Print | Past Issues | Suggested Citation | EID Search | Contact Us | Accessibility | Privacy Policy Notice | CDC Home | CDC Search | Health Topics A-Z |
||
This page posted xxx |
||
Emerging
Infectious Diseases Journal |
||