Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

FFY 2004 CCDF Data Tables (Final, May 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income
The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 2
Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2004)
State Grants/ Contracts % Certificates % Cash % Total
Alabama 0% 100% 0% 47,769
Alaska 0% 92% 8% 9,416
American Samoa 0% 100% 0% 1,583
Arizona 0% 100% 0% 71,341
Arkansas 0% 100% 0% 30,252
California 40% 60% 0% 290,098
Colorado 1% 97% 3% 40,392
Connecticut 42% 58% 0% 28,089
Delaware 0% 100% 0% 10,909
District of Columbia 42% 58% 0% 8,054
Florida 46% 54% 0% 180,737
Georgia 0% 100% 0% 111,606
Guam 0% 100% 0% 1,569
Hawaii 35% 0% 65% 27,520
Idaho 0% 100% 0% 19,039
Illinois 9% 91% 0% 152,636
Indiana 4% 96% 0% 57,964
Iowa 0% 100% 0% 34,284
Kansas 0% 91% 9% 33,899
Kentucky 0% 100% 0% 67,388
Louisiana 0% 100% 0% 114,680
Maine 32% 67% 1% 6,504
Maryland 0% 100% 0% 37,645
Massachusetts 44% 56% 0% 68,825
Michigan 0% 69% 31% 67,698
Minnesota 0% 100% 0% 45,061
Mississippi 13% 87% 0% 33,745
Missouri 0% 100% 0% 72,098
Montana 0% 98% 2% 10,264
Nebraska 0% 100% 0% 26,194
Nevada 21% 79% 0% 12,235
New Hampshire 0% 100% 0% 11,438
New Jersey 19% 81% 0% 72,608
New Mexico 0% 100% 0% 39,599
New York 21% 79% 0% 259,386
North Carolina 0% 100% 0% 119,127
North Dakota 0% 100% 0% 9,813
Northern Mariana Islands 0% 100% 0% 952
Ohio 0% 100% 0% 111,348
Oklahoma 0% 0% 0% 0
Oregon 5% 95% 0% 57,196
Pennsylvania 0% 80% 20% 124,631
Puerto Rico 58% 42% 0% 22,895
Rhode Island 0% 100% 0% 8,849
South Carolina 1% 99% 0% 38,945
South Dakota 2% 98% 0% 9,146
Tennessee 0% 100% 0% 74,832
Texas 0% 100% 0% 255,555
Utah 0% 0% 100% 17,772
Vermont 9% 91% 0% 6,897
Virgin Islands 12% 88% 0% 605
Virginia 0% 100% 0% 56,949
Washington 0% 81% 19% 99,392
West Virginia 0% 100% 0% 18,071
Wisconsin 0% 100% 0% 44,903
Wyoming 0% 100% 0% 8,212
National Total 11% 85% 3% 3,188,617

Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2004. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year.
2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
4. At the time of publication, Oklahoma had not yet reported FFY 2004 ACF-800 data.
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income
Back to top