FFY 2002 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Ages Chart | Reason for Care Chart The entire collection of tables and charts is also available
in Excel
or PDF
format. |
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2002) |
State | Total % of Children | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
Alabama |
100% | 0% | 6% | 6% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
Alaska |
100% | 0% | 10% | 3% | 42% | 4% | 6% | 11% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
American Samoa |
100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arizona |
100% | 0% | 9% | 5% | 73% | 3% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arkansas |
100% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 76% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
California |
100% | 0% | 11% | 9% | 50% | 4% | 1% | 14% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
Colorado |
100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 59% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Connecticut |
100% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 43% | 35% | 6% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Delaware |
100% | 0% | 32% | 2% | 46% | 4% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
District of Columbia |
100% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 51% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 46% |
Florida |
100% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 81% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
Georgia |
100% | 0% | 9% | 2% | 82% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Guam |
100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 54% | 15% | 0% | 25% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
Hawaii |
100% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 19% | 5% | 1% | 34% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 31% |
Idaho |
100% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 44% | 0% | 1% | 21% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Illinois |
100% | 0% | 15% | 1% | 32% | 11% | 16% | 18% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Indiana |
100% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 25% | 2% | 1% | 13% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
Iowa |
100% | 0% | 28% | 14% | 36% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kansas |
100% | 0% | 7% | 41% | 35% | 4% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kentucky |
100% | 0% | 6% | 2% | 71% | 1% | 1% | 12% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Louisiana |
100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 72% | 8% | 7% | 3% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maine |
100% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 48% | 2% | 2% | 9% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maryland |
100% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 41% | 10% | 4% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Massachusetts |
100% | 0% | 6% | 14% | 72% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Michigan |
100% | 0% | 9% | 9% | 16% | 15% | 16% | 35% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Minnesota |
100% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Mississippi |
100% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 80% | 5% | 1% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Missouri |
100% | 0% | 17% | 2% | 43% | 2% | 1% | 7% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
Montana |
100% | 0% | 17% | 34% | 37% | 1% | 0% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nebraska |
100% | 0% | 23% | 12% | 44% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nevada |
100% | 0% | 4% | 1% | 67% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 16% |
New Hampshire |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
New Jersey |
100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 69% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New Mexico |
100% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 44% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New York |
100% | 0% | 13% | 6% | 41% | 6% | 7% | 11% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North Carolina |
100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 84% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North Dakota |
100% | 0% | 36% | 27% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Northern Mariana Islands |
100% | 0% | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Ohio |
100% | 0% | 41% | 1% | 59% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Oklahoma |
100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 81% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Oregon |
100% | 0% | 21% | 1% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 42% | 13% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
Pennsylvania |
100% | 0% | 9% | 4% | 41% | 3% | 8% | 3% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Puerto Rico |
100% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Rhode Island |
100% | 0% | 23% | 0% | 66% | 1% | 2% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Carolina |
100% | 0% | 4% | 4% | 77% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Dakota |
100% | 0% | 39% | 9% | 40% | 1% | 0% | 9% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Tennessee |
100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 77% | 2% | 0% | 2% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Texas |
100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 76% | 8% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Utah |
100% | 5% | 8% | 6% | 37% | 5% | 1% | 35% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Vermont |
100% | 0% | 40% | 0% | 44% | 0% | 4% | 1% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Virgin Islands |
100% | 0% | 1% | 9% | 86% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Virginia |
100% | 1% | 24% | 0% | 62% | 1% | 0% | 8% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Washington |
100% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 43% | 11% | 10% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
West Virginia |
100% | 0% | 42% | 3% | 46% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
Wisconsin |
100% | 0% | 38% | 0% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Wyoming |
100% | 0% | 13% | 13% | 28% | 15% | 4% | 15% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
National Percentage | 100% | 0% | 14% | 4% | 57% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Notes applicable to this table:
1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2002. |
2. | New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type. |
3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
5. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
Index: List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Ages Chart | Reason for Care Chart |