FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
Table 6 Child Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2003) |
||||||||||||
State | Total % of Children | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
Alabama | 100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 69% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
Alaska | 100% | 0% | 17% | 5% | 46% | 5% | 7% | 9% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arizona | 100% | 1% | 9% | 6% | 72% | 3% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arkansas | 100% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
California | 100% | 0% | 11% | 9% | 48% | 4% | 1% | 15% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
Colorado | 100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 60% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Connecticut | 100% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 50% | 14% | 5% | 11% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Delaware | 100% | 0% | 31% | 2% | 45% | 4% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
District of Columbia | 100% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 58% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
Florida | 100% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 80% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
Georgia | 100% | 0% | 9% | 2% | 83% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Guam | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 58% | 11% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
Hawaii | 100% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 20% | 6% | 0% | 51% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
Idaho | 100% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 46% | 1% | 1% | 15% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Illinois | 100% | 0% | 16% | 1% | 33% | 10% | 14% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Indiana | 100% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
Iowa | 100% | 0% | 40% | 12% | 37% | 0% | 1% | 3% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kansas | 100% | 0% | 7% | 41% | 33% | 4% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kentucky | 100% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 72% | 1% | 1% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Louisiana | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 74% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maine | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 48% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maryland | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 41% | 10% | 3% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Massachusetts | 100% | 0% | 5% | 16% | 72% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Michigan | 100% | 0% | 9% | 9% | 16% | 15% | 16% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Minnesota | 100% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 32% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Mississippi | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 83% | 4% | 1% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Missouri | 100% | 0% | 16% | 2% | 42% | 3% | 1% | 10% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
Montana | 100% | 0% | 16% | 34% | 38% | 1% | 1% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nebraska | 100% | 0% | 22% | 12% | 45% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nevada | 100% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 67% | 4% | 1% | 2% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
New Hampshire | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
New Jersey | 100% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 71% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New Mexico | 100% | 0% | 1% | 5% | 48% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New York | 100% | 0% | 14% | 8% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 12% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
North Carolina | 100% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 85% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North Dakota | 100% | 0% | 35% | 28% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 0% | 78% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Ohio | 100% | 0% | 38% | 1% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Oregon | 100% | 0% | 20% | 3% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 44% | 0% | 1% | 1% |
Pennsylvania | 100% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 37% | 3% | 10% | 6% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Puerto Rico | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 68% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Rhode Island | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 67% | 0% | 1% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Carolina | 100% | 0% | 5% | 4% | 74% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Dakota | 100% | 0% | 39% | 9% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Tennessee | 100% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 76% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Texas | 100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 77% | 8% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Utah | 100% | 6% | 8% | 6% | 38% | 8% | 1% | 32% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Vermont | 100% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 46% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Virgin Islands | 100% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 86% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Virginia | 100% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 62% | 1% | 0% | 8% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Washington | 100% | 0% | 29% | 0% | 46% | 11% | 8% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
West Virginia | 100% | 0% | 40% | 3% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Wisconsin | 100% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 64% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Wyoming | 100% | 0% | 14% | 20% | 19% | 31% | 3% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
National Percentage | 100% | 0% | 14% | 4% | 57% | 4% | 3% | 9% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Notes applicable to this table:
1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2003. |
2. | New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type. |
3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
5. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual total reported by all other states. |
6. | Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003. |