FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
Table 5 Child Care and Development Fund Of Children in Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation, Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives (FFY 2003) |
|||
---|---|---|---|
State | Relative | Non-Relative | Total |
Alabama | 25% | 75% | 10,417 |
Alaska | 42% | 58% | 3,478 |
American Samoa | - | - | 0 |
Arizona | 100% | 0% | 6,497 |
Arkansas | - | - | 0 |
California | 59% | 41% | 90,966 |
Colorado | 48% | 52% | 10,568 |
Connecticut | 59% | 41% | 11,490 |
Delaware | 47% | 53% | 2,408 |
District of Columbia | 2% | 98% | 3,452 |
Florida | 5% | 95% | 21,183 |
Georgia | 56% | 44% | 7,762 |
Guam | 52% | 48% | 443 |
Hawaii | 78% | 22% | 14,860 |
Idaho | 42% | 58% | 5,881 |
Illinois | 56% | 44% | 76,626 |
Indiana | 18% | 82% | 27,216 |
Iowa | 29% | 71% | 3,259 |
Kansas | 79% | 21% | 6,092 |
Kentucky | 62% | 38% | 13,924 |
Louisiana | 46% | 54% | 31,513 |
Maine | 48% | 52% | 1,858 |
Maryland | 82% | 18% | 10,918 |
Massachusetts | 70% | 30% | 4,208 |
Michigan | 76% | 24% | 62,845 |
Minnesota | 37% | 63% | 23,674 |
Mississippi | 62% | 38% | 6,000 |
Missouri | 33% | 67% | 27,879 |
Montana | 54% | 46% | 1,290 |
Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 5,057 |
Nevada | 19% | 81% | 4,202 |
New Hampshire | - | - | - |
New Jersey | 27% | 73% | 13,269 |
New Mexico | 72% | 28% | 17,105 |
New York | 45% | 55% | 72,770 |
North Carolina | 78% | 22% | 2,352 |
North Dakota | 100% | 0% | 1,000 |
Northern Mariana Islands | - | - | 0 |
Ohio | - | - | 0 |
Oklahoma | - | - | - |
Oregon | 24% | 76% | 35,646 |
Pennsylvania | 17% | 83% | 54,769 |
Puerto Rico | 72% | 28% | 8,396 |
Rhode Island | 80% | 20% | 633 |
South Carolina | 1% | 99% | 7,500 |
South Dakota | 70% | 30% | 1,014 |
Tennessee | 43% | 57% | 9,370 |
Texas | 100% | 0% | 43,169 |
Utah | 93% | 7% | 7,072 |
Vermont | 5% | 95% | 1,710 |
Virgin Islands | 57% | 43% | 92 |
Virginia | 61% | 39% | 7,259 |
Washington | 68% | 32% | 23,039 |
West Virginia | 73% | 27% | 1,235 |
Wisconsin | - | - | 0 |
Wyoming | 93% | 7% | 3,524 |
National Average | 51% | 49% | 806,890 |
Notes applicable to this table:
1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2003. |
2. | New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type. |
3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
5. | In some States there were no children served in Unregulated settings. |
6. | New York reports monthly averages rather than the disaggregated annual totals reported by all other states. |
7. | Oklahoma has not yet submitted an ACF-800 for FFY 2003. |