FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
Table 1 Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Adjusted Number of Families and Children Served (FFY 2003) |
||
---|---|---|
States/Territories | Average Number of Families | Average Number of Children |
Alabama | 17,600 | 30,400 |
Alaska | 3,000 | 5,300 |
American Samoa | 400 | 700 |
Arizona | 17,100 | 29,100 |
Arkansas | 7,500 | 12,900 |
California | 102,800 | 153,600 |
Colorado | 12,500 | 22,800 |
Connecticut | 6,800 | 11,700 |
Delaware | 4,100 | 6,800 |
District of Columbia | 6,200 | 8,500 |
Florida | 72,400 | 121,200 |
Georgia | 34,700 | 61,900 |
Guam | 200 | 200 |
Hawaii | 7,000 | 11,200 |
Idaho | 4,400 | 7,800 |
Illinois | 44,000 | 85,700 |
Indiana | 18,500 | 34,300 |
Iowa | 8,200 | 14,100 |
Kansas | 8,600 | 16,000 |
Kentucky | 22,900 | 39,900 |
Louisiana | 32,000 | 54,600 |
Maine | 3,100 | 4,500 |
Maryland | 18,200 | 30,000 |
Massachusetts | 23,200 | 32,200 |
Michigan | 31,200 | 61,200 |
Minnesota | 14,300 | 25,700 |
Mississippi | 13,200 | 23,300 |
Missouri | 22,000 | 37,900 |
Montana | 3,100 | 5,200 |
Nebraska | 6,800 | 12,000 |
Nevada | 3,600 | 6,100 |
New Hampshire | 5,000 | 7,300 |
New Jersey | 26,900 | 37,500 |
New Mexico | 12,500 | 22,100 |
New York | 83,200 | 142,700 |
North Carolina | 52,300 | 88,300 |
North Dakota | 3,000 | 4,700 |
Northern Mariana Islands | 200 | 400 |
Ohio | 29,800 | 52,100 |
Oklahoma | 12,900 | 21,300 |
Oregon | 11,900 | 22,100 |
Pennsylvania | 33,200 | 60,700 |
Puerto Rico | - | - |
Rhode Island | 3,700 | 5,800 |
South Carolina | 14,100 | 23,000 |
South Dakota | 2,700 | 4,300 |
Tennessee | 27,000 | 52,100 |
Texas | 62,900 | 117,300 |
Utah | 4,700 | 8,900 |
Vermont | 2,400 | 3,700 |
Virgin Islands | - | - |
Virginia | 15,500 | 25,800 |
Washington | 31,700 | 52,900 |
West Virginia | 5,400 | 9,200 |
Wisconsin | 10,400 | 18,200 |
Wyoming | 2,500 | 4,100 |
Total | 1,023,500 | 1,751,300 |
Notes applicable to this table: | |
1. | The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2003. |
2. | The "adjusted" numbers were obtained by multiplying the respective "unadjusted" numbers by the reported pooling factor percentage that was applicable to the ACF-801 data. |
3. | The reported results shown above have been rounded to the nearest 100. The national numbers are simply the sum of the State and Territory numbers. |
4. | All states provide an actual count of families served. However, the number of children served is not a direct count based on the fact that some States elect to submit sample data versus full population data. For States that submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families is determined and then multiplied by the number of families served to obtain an estimate of the number of children served. |
5. | Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands were unable to report ACF-801 case-level data before report preparation. |
6. | On an ongoing basis, CA serves a significant number of families and children through State funds. Beginning in FY 2002, CA recognized and corrected their reporting to show that only 86% of families and children are being served through CCDF (as opposed to 100%). The other 14% are actually being served by non-CCDF funds. Prior to FY 2002, NY reported children based on a payments system which allowed for a child to be counted more than once. Beginning with FY 2002, NY revised their reporting system. This has had the effect of eliminating double-counting. These changes lowered the national child counts by nearly 100,000 for FY 2002 and FY 2003 as compared to what was reported for FY 2001. |