Child Care Bureau: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), FFY 2002 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)

FFY 2002 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 4 Child Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation (FFY 2002)
State	Licensed / Regulated	Legally Operating Without Regulation	Total
Alabama	79%	21%	56,672
Alaska	56%	44%	16,717
American Samoa	100%	0%	1,153
Arizona	87%	13%	49,852
Arkansas	100%	0%	20,074
California	69%	31%	282,039
Colorado	78%	22%	49,384
Connecticut	50%	51%	29,725
Delaware	79%	21%	10,603
District of Columbia	54%	46%	9,876
Florida	92%	8%	168,332
Georgia	93%	7%	122,409
Guam	55%	45%	762
Hawaii	22%	78%	33,355
Idaho	57%	43%	14,336
Illinois	48%	52%	158,852
Indiana	53%	47%	78,559
Iowa	78%	22%	31,245
Kansas	83%	17%	32,403
Kentucky	79%	21%	77,966
Louisiana	72%	28%	101,409
Maine	79%	21%	7,643
Maryland	76%	24%	51,287
Massachusetts	92%	8%	70,970
Michigan	34%	66%	59,261
Minnesota	60%	40%	51,106
Mississippi	82%	18%	37,302
Missouri	62%	38%	64,868
Montana	88%	12%	12,348
Nebraska	79%	21%	26,483
Nevada	72%	28%	18,213
New Hampshire	-	-	12,195
New Jersey	82%	18%	80,766
New Mexico	51%	49%	37,255
New York	61%	39%	175,128
North Carolina	98%	2%	123,504
North Dakota	92%	8%	10,126
Northern Mariana Islands	100%	0%	343
Ohio	100%	0%	153,159
Oklahoma	100%	0%	70,774
Oregon	42%	58%	49,797
Pennsylvania	54%	46%	111,628
Puerto Rico	61%	39%	21,676
Rhode Island	89%	11%	7,675
South Carolina	84%	16%	42,663
South Dakota	87%	13%	8,024
Tennessee	88%	12%	76,018
Texas	82%	18%	227,326
Utah	57%	43%	18,250
Vermont	83%	17%	7,261
Virgin Islands	96%	4%	1,557
Virginia	86%	14%	52,439
Washington	70%	30%	94,128
West Virginia	92%	8%	17,612
Wisconsin	100%	0%	37,271
Wyoming	54%	46%	6,932
National Total	75%	25%	3,188,711

Notes applicable to this table:

1. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2002. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year.

2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.

3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.

5. New York Reports Monthly Averages rather than the disaggregated Annual total reported by all other states.