Child Care and Development Fund, Report to Congress for Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005
Download the Report to Congress in PDF format. 
(File size is 1.21 Megabytes.)
| Table 12b––Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served by Payment Method (FY 2005) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| State | Grants/ Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % |
| Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Alaska | 0% | 91% | 9% |
| American Samoa | - | - | - |
| Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| California | 39% | 61% | 0% |
| Colorado | 1% | 96% | 3% |
| Connecticut | 44% | 56% | 0% |
| Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| District of Columbia | 3% | 97% | 0% |
| Florida | 42% | 57% | 0% |
| Georgia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Guam | 49% | 51% | 0% |
| Hawaii | 36% | 0% | 64% |
| Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Illinois | 8% | 92% | 0% |
| Indiana | 4% | 96% | 0% |
| Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Kansas | 0% | 94% | 6% |
| Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Louisiana | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Maine | 31% | 67% | 2% |
| Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Massachusetts | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| Michigan | 0% | 70% | 30% |
| Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Mississippi | 4% | 96% | 0% |
| Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Montana | 0% | 98% | 2% |
| Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Nevada | 18% | 82% | 0% |
| New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New Jersey | 18% | 82% | 0% |
| New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| New York | 22% | 78% | 0% |
| North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Oklahoma | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 4% | 96% | 0% |
| Pennsylvania | 0% | 79% | 21% |
| Puerto Rico | 70% | 30% | 0% |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| South Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| South Dakota | 2% | 98% | 0% |
| Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Texas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Vermont | 8% | 92% | 0% |
| Virgin Islands | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Washington | 0% | 82% | 18% |
| West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| National Total | 11% | 85% | 4% |
Notes applicable to this table:
| 1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2005. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year. | |||||
| 2. | All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages. | |||||
| 3. | A "0-percent" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. | |||||
| 4. | At the time of publication, American Samoa and Oklahoma had not yet reported FFY 2005 ACF-800 data. | |||||