Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print �    

TANF Financial Data > FY 2003 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A6 - FY 1998 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2003
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2003 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE		 Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES		 Line 6b
CHILD CARE		 Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 6d
IDA		 Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC		 Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT		 Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS		 Line 6l
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW		 Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ALASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARKANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
CALIFORNIA 40,231,028 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,231,028 0%
COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
CONNECTICUT <1,171> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1,171> 0%
DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
FLORIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
GEORGIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
HAWAII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
IDAHO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
IOWA <676,142> <222,434> 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 <1,053,708> 0%
KANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KENTUCKY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
LOUISIANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MAINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MARYLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MINNESOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEBRASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEVADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW JERSEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW MEXICO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW YORK 8,046,239 8,153,892 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <107,653> 49%
NORTH CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NORTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OHIO 18,175,164 18,175,164 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26%
OKLAHOMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OREGON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
PENNSYLVANIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 163,316 150,180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,136 84%
SOUTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TENNESSEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TEXAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
UTAH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WASHINGTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WEST VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WISCONSIN 102,937 72,582 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,355 6%
WYOMING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Total 66,041,371 26,329,384 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 39,111,987 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 59% -
Percentages 2/ 75% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 45% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Last Updated: July 13, 2004