Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print �    

TANF Financial Data > FY 2003 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A4 - FY 2000 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2003
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2003 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE		 Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES		 Line 6b
CHILD CARE		 Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 6d
IDA		 Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC		 Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT		 Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS		 Line 6l
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW		 Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ALASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARKANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
CALIFORNIA <5,976,077> <2,312,408> <5,809> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <3,657,860> 0%
COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
CONNECTICUT <5,439,662> 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 <376,397> <5,063,266> 0%
DELAWARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 5,783,309 6,217,106 11,550,212 0 0 0 0 0 0 <11,984,009> 766%
FLORIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
GEORGIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
HAWAII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
IDAHO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
IOWA <1,329,642> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1,433,968> 0 104,326 0%
KANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KENTUCKY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
LOUISIANA 345,529 345,528 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1%
MAINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MARYLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN <1,207,472> <1,207,472> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MINNESOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MISSISSIPPI <183,398> <88,918> <3,359> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <91,121> 54%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEBRASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEVADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW JERSEY <1,150,024> <565,085> 0 <6> 0 0 0 <4,970> 0 <579,963> 0%
NEW MEXICO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW YORK <15,958,373> <958,373> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <15,000,000> -9%
NORTH CAROLINA 27,299 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,299 0%
NORTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OHIO 5,132 5,132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OKLAHOMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OREGON <531,891> <1,642,579> 1,110,688 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
PENNSYLVANIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TENNESSEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TEXAS 4,362,403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,362,403 100%
UTAH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WASHINGTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WEST VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WISCONSIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WYOMING 14,388,192 4,187,345 0 716 0 0 0 0 0 10,200,131 98%
Total <6,864,675> 3,980,276 12,651,733 710 0 0 0 <1,438,938> <376,397> <21,682,059> -
Percentages 1/ 100% -58% -184% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 5% 316% -
Percentages 2/ -3% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% -1% 0% -8% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Last Updated: July 13, 2004