[Federal Register: November 30, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 231)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60135-60138]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30no01-36]
[[Page 60135]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VI
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
34 CFR Part 75
Direct Grant Programs; Final Rule
[[Page 60136]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 75
RIN 1890-AA02
Direct Grant Programs
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary amends the Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) that govern discretionary grant
programs. These amendments will implement new options for our
application review process for discretionary grants. These changes will
improve the quality of the review process and provide greater
opportunities for inexperienced, ``novice applicants'' to receive
funding.
DATES: These regulations are effective December 31, 2001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Sinkovits, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3652, ROB-3, Washington, DC
20202-4248. Telephone: (202) 708-7568.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 17, 2000 the Secretary published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this part in the Federal
Register (65 FR 20698).
In the preamble to the NPRM, the Secretary discussed on pages 20699
through 20702 the major changes proposed in that document to increase
the options available for reviewing and selecting discretionary grants.
These included the following:
Amending Sec. 75.217 to include the use of quality bands
to evaluate applications and adding a new Sec. 75.223 to describe the
procedures used under competitions that use quality bands.
Adding a new Sec. 75.224 to address the practice that has
evolved in some program offices of the Department of Education
(Department) involving the use of more than one review of an
application, otherwise known as ``multiple tier review.''
Adding a new Sec. 75.225 to include procedures to use if
the Secretary decides to give special consideration to novice
applicants.
These final regulations contain one significant difference from the
NPRM. As a result of public comments we received, we have decided not
to make final the regulations regarding the use of quality bands in
this document. We would like to do more work to consider fully the
issues raised by commenters and to determine whether to issue final
regulations for the quality band procedures. Rather than delay the
implementation of the procedures for novice applicants, we have decided
to publish as much of the NPRM as possible in final now and to notify
the public of our decision regarding the quality band procedures at a
later date.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Secretary's invitation in the NPRM, sixteen
parties submitted comments on the proposed regulations. An analysis of
the comments and of the changes in the regulations since publication of
the NPRM follows.
We discuss substantive issues under the section of the regulations
to which they pertain. Generally, we do not address technical and other
minor changes, as well as suggested changes that the law does not
authorize the Secretary to make.
A number of commenters supported these regulations while others
raised concerns about them. As discussed earlier, the Secretary has
decided to proceed with publishing these final regulations without the
sections on quality bands. Therefore, these final regulations include
only the sections on multiple tier review and novice procedures. All of
the comments discussed below concern novice procedures, as none were
received on multiple tier review. Before discussing the individual
comments, we provide a general response to the comments we received on
the novice procedures.
The novice procedures were developed in response to the public
perception that the barriers to receiving a grant are highest for those
who have never received a grant before. These procedures are an
additional option for Department staff--they are not required--and
would be used only in those circumstances where they are
programmatically appropriate.
When determining the number of bonus points available to novice
applicants under a particular program, the Secretary will carefully
balance quality concerns with the goal of enabling new applicants to
break into the grant award system. The Secretary will not fund projects
under these procedures that are of poor quality or do not meet the
requirements of the program under which they are funded.
Section 75.225 What Procedures Does the Secretary Use if the Secretary
Decides To Give Special Consideration to Novice Applications?
Comments: A number of commenters strongly supported the novice
procedures, stating that it would be encouraging to first-time
applicants to know that more experienced applicants would not
necessarily win out over less experienced, yet highly qualified
applicants. These commenters believed that this gave their
organizations and their grants' intended beneficiaries a better chance
of benefiting from Federal funding despite their inexperience in
writing applications and managing grants.
Discussion: These comments affirm the Secretary's intent to broaden
the pool of applicants that apply for and ultimately receive funding
under the Department's discretionary grant programs.
Changes: None.
Comments: Several commenters questioned the appropriateness of
allowing programs to give novice applicants any preference in the
selection process, stating that all applicants were novices at one time
and were able to get funded by following the application procedures,
studying funded applications, and submitting high quality proposals.
These commenters were concerned that lower quality applications would
be funded under these procedures. One commenter questioned the
perception held by some unsuccessful applicants that an organization
had to already have a grant to get a grant. Another questioned the need
for a separate regulation to make the funding of novices a priority,
since programs already have the ability to define priorities for
funding.
Discussion: During the Department's reengineering process a
significant number of focus group participants from the applicant
community voiced the opinion that it was very difficult to break into
the grant funding system, particularly for small and inexperienced
organizations that lack the resources to hire professional grant
writers. Therefore, one of the goals of the reengineered grants process
is to broaden the range of grant applicants and recipients who
participate in our programs. Instituting special procedures for novice
applicants is one way to achieve this goal and to address the
perception that our grants process is unfairly weighted toward the
larger institutions with greater resources. The
[[Page 60137]]
Secretary will not fund poor quality applications or ones that do not
address the program's requirements. Although programs may set funding
priorities, the funding of novice applicants is generally not addressed
in this fashion. In addition, this new procedure standardizes the
procedures for programs that choose to open up a competition for
novices, ensuring greater fairness in the process.
Changes: None.
Comments: A number of commenters recommended that the proposed
definition of novice applicant be changed. One commenter suggested that
the five-year period without a Federal discretionary grant be
eliminated from the novice applicant definition and that the Secretary
be given latitude in the final determination of which applicants
qualify as novices. One commenter was concerned that under the proposed
definition, a ``novice applicant'' may never have received a grant
before simply because it did not have the need that would have made it
eligible to apply for a particular grant competition, and not because
it lacked the resources or capacity to apply. Another commenter was
concerned about how the definition would be applied to groups of
applicants, such as consortia and partnerships.
Discussion: The definition was set at five years without a
discretionary grant from any Federal program in order to ensure that
the applicant was truly an inexperienced novice applicant. If the
definition applied only to an applicant that had not received a grant
or subgrant under the particular Department of Education program from
which it seeks funding, then an applicant with extensive experience in
receiving grants from other Federal programs could apply as a novice,
which clearly it would not be.
The Secretary recognizes that there is a slight possibility that an
organization could qualify as a novice, despite the fact that it had
the resources and capacity to apply earlier, but hadn't received a
grant from the Federal government in the past five years merely because
it hadn't had a legitimate reason to apply. However, the Secretary
believes that the likelihood that this would happen is small, and that
achieving the goal of broadening the pool of applicants who apply for,
and ultimately receive, discretionary grant funding outweighs this
concern.
Moreover, the Secretary believes that reserving broad latitude to
determine which applicants qualify as novices would not give all
potential applicants clear notice of the rules by which the competition
will be judged. Finally, the Secretary agrees that clarification is
needed in these final regulations regarding how the novice applicant
definition would apply to applications submitted by groups, such as
partnerships or consortia. The Secretary believes that in order for an
application submitted by a group to qualify as a novice application,
all members of the group should meet the definition of novice
applicant. The Secretary has also amended the novice applicant
definition to clarify that any member of a group application that
receives a grant under a Department program could not qualify in the
future as a novice applicant for that program.
Changes: In order to provide clarification on how the novice
application procedures would apply to applications submitted by a
group, the Secretary has amended the novice applicant definition in
Sec. 75.225(a) to indicate that when a group submits a novice
application each member of the group must meet the novice applicant
definition. Further, we have amended the definition to preclude members
of a group of eligible applicants that receives a grant from being
considered as novice applicants under that particular program in the
future. Section 75.225 (a) has also been renumbered accordingly.
Comments: Several commenters supported the idea of separate
competitions for novice applicants, but did not want standards to be
lowered for these competitions; novice applicants should have to meet
the same requirements as any other applicant. There was also support
for keeping the size of the awards to novices relatively small. Others
commented that the winners of novice competitions might require closer
monitoring or additional technical support until the novice grantees
develop more experience in grants administration. Another commenter
thought it would be more prudent to give the additional assistance in
advance of the competition, to ensure the submission of high quality
proposals.
Discussion: We agree that novice applicants must meet the same
requirements as other applicants. As discussed earlier, the purpose of
this regulation is to increase the number of competent grantees, not to
reward lower quality applications with funding. In addition, it has
always been the policy of the Department to nurture successful projects
by providing assistance to new grant recipients, particularly first-
time or relatively inexperienced grantees. This assistance is given in
the form of technical assistance workshops, where training in basic
grants administration is provided, as well as regular contact by phone
or e-mail between Department staff and grant project staff. We expect
that in the case of novice grantees, post-award support will be
provided to a greater extent than normal, to help ensure the success of
these projects. In fact, the use of special procedures for novice
applicants will make it easier for program staff to identify those
applicants that may need the most assistance. As we gain experience
with novice applicants, the most effective ways of ensuring their
success will in all likelihood become more evident.
Changes: None.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These regulations do not contain any information collection
requirements.
Intergovernmental Review
These final regulations are not subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However,
many of the programs that these final regulations would apply to are
subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
The objective of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism by relying on processes
developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of
proposed Federal financial assistance.
In accordance with the order, we intend this document to provide
early notification of the Department's specific plans and actions for
these programs.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments on whether the proposed
regulations would require transmission of information that any other
agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes available.
Based on the response to the NPRM and on our review, we have
determined that these final regulations do not require transmission of
information that any other agency or authority of the United States
gathers or makes available.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-
[[Page 60138]]
888-293-6498; or in the Washington, D.C., area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number does not apply)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 75
Administrative practice and procedure, Education Department, Grant
programs--education, Grant administration, Performance reports,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Unobligated funds.
Dated: November 26, 2001.
Rod Paige,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary amends
part 75 of title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 757--DIRECT GRANT PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for Part 75 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 75.223 is added and reserved and new Secs. 75.224 and
74.225 are added to subpart D under the undesignated center heading
``Selection Procedures'' to read as follows:
Sec. 75.223 [Reserved]
Sec. 75.224 What are the procedures for using a multiple tier review
process to evaluate applications?
(a) The Secretary may use a multiple tier review process to
evaluate applications.
(b) The Secretary may refuse to review applications in any tier
that do not meet a minimum cut-off score established for the prior
tier.
(c) The Secretary may establish the minimum cut-off score--
(1) In the application notice published in the Federal Register; or
(2) After reviewing the applications to determine the overall range
in the quality of applications received.
(d) The Secretary may, in any tier--
(1) Use more than one group of experts to gain different
perspectives on an application; and
(2) Refuse to consider an application if the application is
rejected under paragraph (b) of this section by any one of the groups
used in the prior tier.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
Sec. 75.225 What procedures does the Secretary use if the Secretary
decides to give special consideration to novice applications?
(a) As used in this section, ``novice applicant'' means--
(1) Any applicant for a grant from ED that--
(i) Has never received a grant or subgrant under the program from
which it seeks funding;
(ii) Has never been a member of a group application, submitted in
accordance with Secs. 75.127-75.129, that received a grant under the
program from which it seeks funding; and
(iii) Has not had an active discretionary grant from the Federal
Government in the five years before the deadline date for applications
under the program.
(2) In the case of a group application submitted in accordance with
Secs. 75.127-129, a group that includes only parties that meet the
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(b) For the purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, a
grant is active until the end of the grant's project or funding period,
including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee's
authority to obligate funds.
(c) If the Secretary determines that special consideration of
novice applications is appropriate, the Secretary may either--
(1) Establish a separate competition for novice applicants; or
(2) Give competitive preference to novice applicants under the
procedures in 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2).
(d) Before making a grant to a novice applicant, the Secretary
imposes special conditions, if necessary, to ensure the grant is
managed effectively and project objectives are achieved.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[FR Doc. 01-29726 Filed 11-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-U