Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search

FFY 2004 CCDF Data Tables (Final, May 2006)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income
The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 4
Child Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation (FFY 2004)
State Licensed / Regulated Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Total
Alabama 74% 26% 47,769
Alaska 75% 25% 9,416
American Samoa 100% 0% 1,583
Arizona 88% 12% 71,341
Arkansas 100% 0% 30,252
California 68% 32% 290,098
Colorado 78% 22% 40,392
Connecticut 67% 33% 28,089
Delaware 81% 19% 10,909
District of Columbia 58% 42% 8,054
Florida 92% 8% 180,737
Georgia 94% 6% 111,606
Guam 53% 47% 1,569
Hawaii 19% 81% 27,520
Idaho 62% 38% 19,039
Illinois 52% 48% 152,636
Indiana 65% 35% 57,964
Iowa 89% 11% 34,284
Kansas 80% 20% 33,899
Kentucky 83% 17% 67,388
Louisiana 73% 27% 114,680
Maine 88% 12% 6,504
Maryland 77% 23% 37,645
Massachusetts 94% 6% 68,825
Michigan 33% 67% 67,698
Minnesota 65% 35% 45,061
Mississippi 87% 13% 33,745
Missouri 61% 39% 72,098
Montana 87% 13% 10,264
Nebraska 78% 22% 26,194
Nevada 71% 29% 12,235
New Hampshire 73% 27% 11,438
New Jersey 85% 15% 72,608
New Mexico 56% 44% 39,599
New York 50% 50% 259,386
North Carolina 98% 2% 119,127
North Dakota 69% 31% 9,813
Northern Mariana Islands 100% 0% 952
Ohio 100% 0% 111,348
Oklahoma - - -
Oregon 39% 61% 57,196
Pennsylvania 55% 45% 124,631
Puerto Rico 63% 37% 22,895
Rhode Island 95% 5% 8,849
South Carolina 81% 19% 38,945
South Dakota 88% 12% 9,146
Tennessee 87% 13% 74,832
Texas 83% 17% 255,555
Utah 57% 43% 17,772
Vermont 78% 22% 6,897
Virgin Islands 96% 4% 605
Virginia 87% 13% 56,949
Washington 81% 19% 99,392
West Virginia 96% 4% 18,071
Wisconsin 100% 0% 44,903
Wyoming 34% 66% 8,212
National Total 74% 26% 3,188,617

Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2004. The ACF-800 is based on an annual unduplicated count of families and children; i.e. a family or child that receives one hour of service on one day is counted the same as a family or child that receives full-time care throughout the fiscal year.  
2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. A few States have indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes all these factors into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.  
3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.  
4. At the time of publication, Oklahoma had not yet reported FFY 2004 ACF-800 data.  
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

Back to top