FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type
| 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served by Payment Method (FFY 2000) |
State | Grants / Contracts % | Certificates % | Cash % |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Alaska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
American Samoa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Arizona | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Arkansas | 0% | 100% | 0% |
California | 43% | 57% | 0% |
Colorado | 2% | 96% | 2% |
Connecticut | 18% | 82% | 0% |
Delaware | 0% | 100% | 0% |
District of Columbia | 73% | 27% | 0% |
Florida | 71% | 29% | 0% |
Georgia | 2% | 98% | 0% |
Guam | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Hawaii | 16% | 0% | 84% |
Idaho | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Illinois | 12% | 88% | 0% |
Indiana | 4% | 96% | 0% |
Iowa | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Kansas | 0% | 93% | 7% |
Kentucky | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Louisiana | 0% | 64% | 36% |
Maine | 24% | 76% | 1% |
Maryland | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Massachusetts | 41% | 59% | 0% |
Michigan | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Minnesota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Mississippi | 3% | 97% | 0% |
Missouri | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Montana | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Nebraska | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Nevada | 19% | 81% | 0% |
New Hampshire | 0% | 100% | 0% |
New Jersey | 18% | 82% | 0% |
New Mexico | 0% | 100% | 0% |
New York | 24% | 76% | 0% |
North Carolina | 0% | 100% | 0% |
North Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Northern Mariana Islands | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Ohio | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Oklahoma | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Oregon | 9% | 91% | 0% |
Pennsylvania | 0% | 72% | 28% |
Puerto Rico | 36% | 64% | 0% |
Rhode Island | 0% | 100% | 0% |
South Carolina | 13% | 87% | 0% |
South Dakota | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Tennessee | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Texas | 0% | 80% | 20% |
Utah | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Vermont | 3% | 97% | 0% |
Virgin Islands | 3% | 97% | 0% |
Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Washington | 0% | 67% | 33% |
West Virginia | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Wisconsin | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Wyoming | 0% | 100% | 0% |
National | 11% | 83% | 6% |
Notes:
1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
2. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
3. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
![]() |
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |