FFY 2003 CCDF Data Tables (Expanded Set of Tables, June 2006)
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs.Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family IncomeThe entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.
Table 9 Child Care and Development Fund Average Monthly Percent of Children In Care By Age Group (FFY 2003) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | 0 to< 1 yr | 1 yr to< 2 yrs | 2 yrs to< 3 yrs | 3 yrs to< 4 yrs | 4 yrs to< 5 yrs | 5 yrs to< 6 yrs | 6 yrs to< 13 yrs | 13+ yrs | Total |
Alabama | 6% | 13% | 15% | 15% | 13% | 9% | 29% | 0% | 100% |
Alaska | 6% | 11% | 13% | 15% | 13% | 10% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
American Samoa | 9% | 18% | 24% | 22% | 17% | 9% | 1% | 0% | 100% |
Arizona | 6% | 10% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 34% | 0% | 100% |
Arkansas | 9% | 15% | 16% | 15% | 13% | 9% | 23% | 0% | 100% |
California | 3% | 6% | 9% | 14% | 18% | 12% | 38% | 1% | 100% |
Colorado | 7% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 11% | 32% | 0% | 100% |
Connecticut | 4% | 9% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 41% | 1% | 100% |
Delaware | 7% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 31% | 1% | 100% |
District of Columbia | 3% | 10% | 15% | 18% | 14% | 8% | 30% | 0% | 100% |
Florida | 5% | 11% | 13% | 14% | 15% | 11% | 32% | 0% | 100% |
Georgia | 7% | 13% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 9% | 29% | 0% | 100% |
Guam | 5% | 11% | 17% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 17% | 1% | 100% |
Hawaii | 5% | 11% | 13% | 15% | 18% | 8% | 29% | 1% | 100% |
Idaho | 7% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 31% | 0% | 100% |
Illinois | 6% | 9% | 10% | 11% | 10% | 9% | 44% | 1% | 100% |
Indiana | 5% | 11% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 34% | 0% | 100% |
Iowa | 7% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 33% | 1% | 100% |
Kansas | 7% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 31% | 0% | 100% |
Kentucky | 7% | 12% | 14% | 14% | 12% | 10% | 32% | 0% | 100% |
Louisiana | 7% | 14% | 16% | 15% | 11% | 8% | 30% | 0% | 100% |
Maine | 4% | 8% | 11% | 15% | 16% | 12% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
Maryland | 4% | 10% | 13% | 14% | 12% | 10% | 36% | 0% | 100% |
Massachusetts | 5% | 10% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 36% | 0% | 100% |
Michigan | 6% | 9% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 9% | 45% | 1% | 100% |
Minnesota | 7% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 12% | 9% | 36% | 0% | 100% |
Mississippi | 3% | 9% | 12% | 14% | 13% | 11% | 38% | 0% | 100% |
Missouri | 6% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 9% | 31% | 0% | 100% |
Montana | 6% | 11% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 11% | 30% | 0% | 100% |
Nebraska | 9% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 31% | 0% | 100% |
Nevada | 5% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 35% | 1% | 100% |
New Hampshire | 4% | 9% | 12% | 14% | 15% | 13% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
New Jersey | 4% | 9% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 11% | 39% | 1% | 100% |
New Mexico | 7% | 11% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 35% | 0% | 100% |
New York | 4% | 8% | 10% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 44% | 0% | 100% |
North Carolina | 6% | 10% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 9% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
North Dakota | 9% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 11% | 27% | 0% | 100% |
Northern Mariana Islands | 7% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 13% | 11% | 30% | 0% | 100% |
Ohio | 6% | 11% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
Oklahoma | 8% | 13% | 14% | 14% | 12% | 10% | 28% | 0% | 100% |
Oregon | 7% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 11% | 10% | 37% | 0% | 100% |
Pennsylvania | 5% | 9% | 11% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 41% | 0% | 100% |
Puerto Rico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Rhode Island | 5% | 9% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 40% | 0% | 100% |
South Carolina | 4% | 9% | 14% | 16% | 15% | 12% | 30% | 0% | 100% |
South Dakota | 8% | 12% | 14% | 14% | 13% | 11% | 28% | 0% | 100% |
Tennessee | 6% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 34% | 0% | 100% |
Texas | 7% | 12% | 14% | 13% | 11% | 9% | 32% | 0% | 100% |
Utah | 5% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 36% | 0% | 100% |
Vermont | 5% | 9% | 11% | 13% | 14% | 11% | 35% | 1% | 100% |
Virgin Islands | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Virginia | 5% | 10% | 14% | 15% | 13% | 10% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
Washington | 6% | 11% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 11% | 35% | 0% | 100% |
West Virginia | 6% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 37% | 0% | 100% |
Wisconsin | 7% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 33% | 0% | 100% |
Wyoming | 8% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 11% | 29% | 0% | 100% |
National | 6% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 35% | 0% | 100% |
Notes applicable to this table:
1. | The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2003. |
2. | National percentages are based on the "adjusted" national numbers unless otherwise indicated. In other words, the national percentages are equivalent to a weighted average of the State percentages, where the weights are the "adjusted" number of families or children served as appropriate. |
3. | Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands were unable to report ACF-801 case-level data before report preparation. |
4. | Alaska’s population reported does not accurately reflect the population served due to sampling difficulties the State is trying to resolve. |
5. | In some instances, the Total may appear to be slightly more or less than 100% because of rounding. |