Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

Return to Previous page   

PDF Version, B&W Printable PDF Version of this report


Language, Literacy and Numeracy Instruments, Measure modified from Color Concepts and Number Concepts

I. Background Information

Measure/ Source:

  • Color Names and Counting
  • Original Family And Child Experiences Survey (FACES) measure modified from the Color Concepts and Number Concepts tasks in: Jana M. Mason and Janice Stewart (1989), The CAP Early Childhood Diagnostic Instrument (prepublication edition), American Testronics.

Purpose of Measure:

As used in the Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES): The Color Names and Counting was designed to assess knowledge of colors and counting ability.

Population Measure Developed With:

  • 2479 children in the FACES sample between the ages of 3 and 5.
  • The FACES sample was randomly drawn from a stratified probability sample of 43 Head Start programs selected to represent the universe of Head Start programs in the 50 states, excluding migrant programs and American Indian programs.
  African
American
White Hispanic Other Total
  N % N % N % N % N %
Male 343 13.8 471 19.0 363 14.6 65 2.6 1242 50.1
Female 383 15.4 415 16.7 371 14.9 68 2.7 1237 49.9
Total 726 29.3 886 35.7 734 29.6 133 5.4 2479 100

 

Key Constructs of Measure:

  • Color Naming. This measure assesses the child’s ability to identify 10 colors by name. The child receives two points for each color named by the child and one point for each color that the assessor names and the child finds correctly. Scores range from zero to 20.
  • One-to-One Counting. A rating on a five-point scale of how well the child counts 10 pictures of bears and arrives at the correct sum. Lower ratings are given for mistakes like skipping one or more bears, counting bears twice, saying numbers twice, not saying one number per bear, and losing place and starting over. Ratings ranging from 1 (“child could not count or did not try”) through 3 (“fairly well, child made one or two uncorrected mistakes”) to 5 (“perfectly, no mistakes”).

Norming of Measure (Criterion or Norm): Criterion

II. Administration of Measure

Who is the Respondent to the Measure?:

This individually administered test is designed to assess the early numeracy of children ages from 3- to 5-years old.

Who Administers Measure/ Training Required?:

Trained assessors.

Setting (e.g. 1 on1, group level, etc): 1 on 1

III. Functioning of Measure

Reliability with FACES data:

Internal Consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha)

  • Color Names: .94

Validity: For first cohort of FACES study (1997-1999), we conducted validity analyses for entire FACES battery, of which the Color Names and Counting scales were components. Two outcome variables were used in these analyses: ECLS-K Reading Scale and ECLS-K General Knowledge Scale.

Predictive Validity:

  • Correlation between Color Names and Counting scores at end of Head Start year (spring 1998) and ECLS-K Reading scale scores at end of kindergarten year (spring 1999): Color Names - r = .39; Counting - r = .40
  • Correlation between Color Names and Counting scores at end of Head Start year (spring 1998) and ECLS-K General Knowledge scale scores at end of kindergarten year (spring 1999): Color Names - r = .38; Counting - r = .36
  • In multivariate regression analyses with the scale scores from entire FACES battery at the end of Head Start year predicting ECLS-K Reading scores at end of kindergarten year, Counting (beta = .12) tasks was a significant predictor in the model.

Sensitivity to Environmental Variation (specify if intervention):

  • Over the course of the Head Start year, significant increases were observed in both Color Names scores (effect size = .59) and Counting rating (effect size = .49).
  • In FACES, the Color Names and Counting tasks have been found to identify the differential school readiness skills of preschool children from low income families (Zill, Resnick, McKey, Clark, Connell, Swartz, O’Brien, & D’Elio, 1998; Zill, Resnick, Kim, McKey, Clark, Pai-Samant, Connell, Vaden-Kiernan, O’Brien, & D’Elio, 2001)

Concerns, Comments & Recommendations:

  • In FACES, the Color Names and Counting tasks are part of a battery of tests used to assess school readiness in preschool children from low income families.
  • Short test with reasonable validity and reliability.
  • Children enjoy tasks and results are readily explainable to teachers and parents.
  • Scores are given as raw scores.


 

 

Return to Previous page