Wednesday, March 5, 2008
From the Public Health Law Program, Office of the Chief of Public
Health Practice, CDC
http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/
_______________________________________________________________
*** SARS Series.
The South China Morning Post has published a five-part series on
the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic that began
in 2003. To access the articles, visit
http://www.scmp.com/portal/site/SCMP/menuitem.fbb9378714106e9733492d9253
a0a0a0/?vgnextoid=813b45cf8e492110VgnVCM100000360a0a0aRCRD&ss=Specials&s=Home
&channelManagedId=74c9c28fbaf48110VgnVCM100000360a0a0aRCRD&specName=After+Sars.
*** Ethics,
Human Rights, International Law Article. A 2007 paper entitled
"The Duty of States to Assist Other States in Need: Ethics, Human
rights, and International Law," written by Lawrence O. Gostin and
Robert Archer, has been released and is freely downloadable from
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1095769.
*** Tobacco
Industry Report. A coalition of public health organizations,
including the American Cancer Society, American Lung Association,
American Heart Association, and Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids,
have released Big Tobacco's Guinea Pigs: How an Unregulated Industry
Experiments on America's Kids and Consumers. To access the report,
visit
http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/products/index.php.
*** Tobacco
Law Information. The Technical Assistance Legal Center (TALC)
has released a supplement to "Tobacco Laws Affecting California."
TALC has also published Model Ordinance Checklists to help communities
draft and adopt legislation based on the Center's model ordinances.
To access the documents, visit
http://www.talc.phi.org/.
*** Public Health
Law Internship. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is offering
a paid, full-time, summer internship in public health law. The intern
will work at the Foundation office in Princeton, New Jersey, and
gain experience in legal research and analysis. For more information,
visit
http://www.rwjf.org/about/jobdetail.jsp?id=10112.
*** Unsafe Food
Hearing (3/12). The U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing
entitled "Regulatory Failure: Must America Live with Unsafe Food?"
on March 12, 2008. For more information, visit
http://energycommerce.house.gov/membios/schedule.shtml.
*** Lead Poisoning
Prevention Meeting (3/18-3/19). CDC will host an open meeting
of the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
on March 18-19, 2008, at the CDC campus in Atlanta. For more information,
visit
http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/events/calendar.htm.
Top Story
1. California:
In a massive disaster, care will be scarce
States and Localities
2. New York:
Council vote for good health may weaken business at groceries
3. North
Carolina: Law will bring monitoring changes
4. Virginia:
Bill targets frequent test-takers at DMV
National
5. Humane
Society Sues USDA over mad-cow safety rules
6. More
families are shunning inoculations
7. Superbug
defies antibiotics
8. Unsafe
at any speed, with any driver
International
9. Israel:
Israelis fume over smoking ban on army bases
Briefly Noted
Alaska greenhouse
gas suit · California EPA decision · Free lunch · Ship exhaust limits
· Idaho field burning pact · Massachusetts healthcare initiative
· Teen smoking · Nebraska smoking ban · New Jersey cell phone drivers
· North Carolina TVA pollution suit · Virginia school emergency
plans · West Virginia DuPont suit · National Great Lakes report
· Asbestos exposure · School lunch standards · Indian health care
bill · Australia reckless HIV guidelines · Canada vaccination ruling
· Sausage rules · Japan asbestos suit · Uganda smoking ban ruling
· United Kingdom nicotine patches
Quotation of
the Week
A news story
headline, circa 1930
This Week's
Feature
Monthly
Quiz. Are you itching to show off your superior powers of recall?
Try the February Quiz and wow your friends with your News
knowledge! See below.
_____________________________1_____________________________
"In a massive disaster,
care will be scarce"
Sacramento Bee
(03/02/08) Dorsey Griffith
http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/753359.html
The California
Department of Public Health (DPH) recently issued groundbreaking
guidance for health care and emergency responders in the event of
a disaster. The guidance document comprises 1,900 pages and focuses
on the need to suspend or flex established laws and to ration health
care during catastrophes. "I don't know of any state that has taken
it to this level of detail in outlining a surge plan for everyone
who needs to respond to an emergency of this magnitude," said Jeff
Levi, executive director of Trust for America's Health. The guidelines
go against the ingrained instincts of professionals who are trained
to save lives at almost any cost, according to Betsey Lyman, deputy
director for public health emergency preparedness at DPH. "This
is, 'OK, we have limited resources. How do we best save the greatest
number of lives?'" Lyman said. For instance, to minimize red tape,
hospitals will not be required to report births, deaths, infectious
disease outbreaks, medication errors, or suspected child or elder
abuse. Also, unlicensed or retired health care providers with lapsed
licenses will be recruited to provide emergency care during a health
care surge. The guidance suggests that medical treatment go first
to people who are more likely to survive with immediate intervention
rather than to those who are most critically ill. "Everybody will
have to think differently," said Duane Dauner, president of the
California Hospital Association.
[Editor's note:
To access "Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during
Emergencies," see
http://bepreparedcalifornia.ca.gov/EPO/CDPHPrograms/PublicHealthPrograms/Emergency
PreparednessOffice/EPOProgramsServices/Surge/SurgeStandardsGuidelines/.]
_____________________________2_____________________________
"Council vote for
good health may weaken business at groceries in poor neighborhoods"
New York Times
(02/28/08) Ray Rivera
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/nyregion/28grocer.html
In its latest public
health initiative, the New York City Council has approved a bill
that increases the number of fruit and vegetable sidewalk carts
allowed in neighborhoods with high rates of obesity, diabetes, and
other health problems. The measure focuses on those neighborhoods,
where a dearth of supermarkets make many residents rely on bodegas
(small grocery shops) for food purchases. In 2006, the city health
department conducted a survey finding that only 20 to 40 percent
of bodegas carried apples, oranges and bananas and that only 2 to
6 percent sold leafy green vegetables. "This is not going to end
the obesity epidemic, but it is an important step to increase access
to healthy food in the communities that need it most," said Dr.
Thomas Frieden, the city's health commissioner. One of the main
concerns expressed by some Council members was how neighborhoods
were chosen for more produce vendors. Areas were targeted based
on consumption rather than supply; neighborhoods where more than
15 percent of residents said they had not eaten fruits or vegetables
in the last 24 hours made the list, no matter how many area stores
offered fresh produce. "It's the execution that's wrong," said Sung
Soo Kim, president of the Korean-American Small Business Service
Center of New York. Kim said the city should identify neighborhoods
where fresh fruit and vegetables are not available before deciding
where to place vendors. Councilman John C. Liu of Queens criticized
the city for "backwards voodoo economics" and proposed that a small
number of vendors be sent to the neighborhoods to see if "increasing
supply actually increases demand."
[Editor's note:
To read "A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city
of New York, in relation to green carts," which has now been sent
to Mayor Bloomberg for his signature, see
http://webdocs.nyccouncil.info/textfiles/Int 0665-2007.htm?CFID=1392793&CFTOKEN=95561856.]
_____________________________3_____________________________
"Law will bring
monitoring changes"
Fayetteville Observer
(02/28/08) Greg Barnes
http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=286872
Beginning July
1, 2008, all new wells in North Carolina will be inspected, sampled,
and granted permits to ensure that drinking water complies
with state standards. "The current lack of effective monitoring
of water quality from private drinking water wells may leave our
state's population vulnerable to unrecognized health threats," said
Jim Hayes, an environmental supervisor with the North Carolina Division
of Public Health. According to state estimates, between 10,000 and
20,000 new wells are drilled in North Carolina each year, and only
32 of the state's 85 local health departments test wells for contaminants.
Under the new law, certified laboratories will test water using
the same standards applied to public water supplies. Originally,
the state considered using stricter standards outlined in the North
Carolina Department of Health and Human Services' public health
goals. But opposition from well drillers and others in the water
industry led the state's Commission for Public Health to adopt the
less stringent standards already applied to public drinking water
supplies. "We can't force anybody to follow these public health
goals. They are ideals that we would like to strive for," said Dr.
Doug Campbell, head of the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology
Branch of the state's Division of Public Health. The most pronounced
difference between the public health goals and public water supply
standards deals with arsenic. The public water supply standard is
10 parts per billion; the public health goal, 0.0017 parts per billion.
Wells will be inspected for arsenic and 19 other contaminants, including
coliform bacteria, barium, copper, lead, mercury, nitrate, and zinc.
[Editor's note:
To read "An Act to require permitting and inspection of new private
drinking water wells and to require water quality testing of private
drinking water wells," North Carolina Session Law 2006-202, see
http://www.legislature.state.nc.us/Sessions/2005/Bills/House/PDF/H2873v6.pdf.]
_____________________________4_____________________________
"Bill targets frequent
test-takers at DMV"
Washington Post
(02/28/08) Anita Kumar
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/27/AR2008022703283.html
Virginia legislators
may soon finalize legislation to limit the number of times that
a person can take a driver's license exam. Karen Chappell, deputy
commissioner of operations for the Virginia Department of Motor
Vehicles (DMV), said the measure would increase road safety, reduce
congestion at DMV offices, and save money. "We've got people basically
using the road test to learn how to drive," Chappell said. The original
House bill would restrict applicants to no more than three written
or behind-the-wheel tests every three months. Applicants who fail
three times would need to attend driving school prior to re-taking
the test(s). (Current Virginia law allows applicants to take both
exams an unlimited number of times for $2 per test.) According to
the DMV, a majority of failing applicants are adults; people younger
than 19 years old must complete in-class and behind-the-wheel training
whereas older applicants have no such requirements. Massachusetts
and Minnesota have already enacted measures that require driving
school after a certain number of failed tests; New York and Kansas
charge higher fees to applicants who fail multiple times; and Washington
D.C. limits applicants to three tests per year. The Virginia bill
passed unanimously in the state House, and the Senate passed an
amended version of the bill on March 4, 2008. The amended bill now
goes back to the House.
[Editor's note:
To read HB 1245, as amended by the state Senate, see
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?081+ful+HB1245S1.
To check the status of the bill, see
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?081+sum+HB1245.]
_____________________________5_____________________________
"Humane Society
Sues USDA over mad-cow safety rules"
Wall Street Journal
(02/28/08) Ilan Brat and others
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120416641582098803.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
(subscription required)
The Humane Society
filed suit last week against the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) over a purported loophole in regulations meant to prevent
bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Under USDA regulations,
"downer cattle" that cannot stand or walk on their own are generally
prohibited from entering the human food supply because inability
to walk is a symptom of BSE. But in July 2007, USDA issued a regulatory
exception to that rule, allowing federal veterinarians to determine
case-by-case whether to permit non-ambulatory cattle that become
injured following an initial inspection. "It's an inconsistent policy
in the sense that the timing of the animal going down is irrelevant
in terms of the food-safety or animal-health issues," said Wayne
Pacelle, president of the Humane Society. USDA declined comment
on the pending litigation. According to Ron DeHaven, chief executive
of the American Veterinary Medical Association and former administrator
of animal testing at USDA, three main safeguards protect humans
from eating BSE-infected meat, which can lead to a fatal brain affliction.
First, hundreds of thousands of high risk cattle have been tested
by USDA since 2003 (with only one in a million diagnosed with BSE);
second, USDA generally prohibits downer cattle; third, USDA prohibits
feed containing brain, spinal-cord tissue and other parts that could
contain BSE. Immediately prior to filing suit, the Humane Society
released a video showing workers at a meat plant in California processing
downer cattle for human consumption; the video prompted the recall
of 143 million pounds of beef.
[Editor's note:
To read the complaint filed by the Humane Society filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia, see
http://www.hsus.org/web-files/PDF/farm/hsus-v-schafer-usda-complaint.pdf
.]
_____________________________6_____________________________
"More families
are shunning inoculations"
New York Times
(03/02/08) Fran Silverman
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/02Rvaccine.html
As the number of
vaccines required by states for school entry increases, so does
the number of parents seeking exemptions for religious and medical
reasons. Many such exemption requests come from parents who believe
that the vaccine preservative thimerosal causes autism, despite
studies by CDC and other major health organizations that have failed
to show a causal link. "The whole vaccinations process is based
on fear of getting diseases but I would rather put my faith in God
to heal diseases," said Rita M. Palma of New York, who wants a religious
exemption for her sons. Last week, a CDC advisory panel recommended
that children ages six months to 18 years receive annual influenza
shots (rather than six months to five years). Also, both New Jersey
and New York now mandate pneumonia vaccines for preschool children
and booster shots against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus for
sixth graders; New Jersey further requires influenza shots for preschoolers
and a meningitis booster for sixth graders; and Connecticut is considering
similar measures. "With the sheer number of vaccinations recommended
there is more of a backlash, more parents with questions," said
Mike Bolduc, epidemiologist for the Connecticut Department of Health's
immunization program. More parents are also requesting medical and
religious waivers; in New York, the percent of the school-age population
exempted from mandatory vaccination has almost doubled since 1999.
New York and New Jersey also have legislation pending that would
add a "conscientious objector" exemption to give parents another
waiver avenue.
[Editor's note:
To access the recommendations of the CDC's Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP), upon which the recently passed New
Jersey vaccination requirements are based, see
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/ACIP-list.htm.]
_____________________________7_____________________________
"Superbug defies
antibiotics"
Baltimore Sun
(03/01/08) Dennis O'Brien
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/health/bal-te.mrsa01mar01,0,4304662.story?track=rss
Public health officials,
hospitals, and legislators in Maryland have been debating the best
legislative approach to curbing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA). "I think what all the experts are recognizing
is that there's no single silver-bullet approach to this problem,"
said Dr. John Jernigan, CDC expert on hospital-acquired MRSA. In
a report released last fall, CDC estimated that MRSA could be responsible
for more than 19,000 deaths a year in the United States. Maryland
legislation that failed this session would have required hospitals
to report MRSA cases to state health authorities and to test high-risk
patients, but the bills died in the state's Senate Finance Committee.
"It's clear to me hospitals don't want to be told this is the way
to go," said Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, who sponsored the measures. According
to the Maryland Hospital Association, the bills were flawed. "It
would have taken clinical guidelines and made them into law, and
that's never a good idea," said Nancy Fielder, spokeswoman for the
Association. Also, some experts say the problem is too complicated
for a blanket approach. While MRSA might be a serious threat in
some hospitals, universal testing would diminish resources at facilities
where infections are rare and could thwart efforts to tailor better
solutions, said Kathy Warye, CEO of the Association for Professionals
in Infection Control and Epidemiology. Meanwhile, New Jersey, New
York, and the Department of Veterans Affairs have mandated that
hospitals test all patients for MRSA upon admittance; Pennsylvania
and Illinois have required hospitals to test patients considered
high-risk.
[Editor's note:
To read N.J.S.A. 26:2H-12.35, et seq., the New Jersey law enacted
last year, see
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2006/Bills/PL07/120_.PDF.]
_____________________________8_____________________________
"Unsafe at any
speed, with any driver"
Wall Street Journal
(03/03/08) Cynthia Crossen
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120450278846906421.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
(subscription required)
In 1930, automobiles
constituted one of the United States' major public health threats,
when more than 31,000 people died on the nation's roads. By comparison,
today some 42,000 people die every year in automobile-related accidents,
but there are 10 times as many cars and a host of road and safety
standards, driver license requirements, and traffic laws that address
issues from drunk driving to speeding. In the first decades of the
twentieth century, a typical headline in a regional newspaper would
read "Twenty-One Persons Meet Death in Auto Accidents on Sunday"
or "16 killed, 31 Others Injured in Traffic Crashes." Early automobiles
had none of today's safety features, such as anti-lock brakes, steel-belted
tires, or shatter-proof glass. In many states, drivers were not
required to pass any types of exams or be a certain age to get behind
the wheel. And in New York City, traffic laws were enforced only
from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. In 1925, almost 16,000 children were struck
by cars in New York state; 560 of them died. Also compounding the
fatality rate were pedestrians who were unfamiliar with the new
rules of the road. After tens of thousands of deaths, drivers and
regulators realized how dangerous even a sober, adult driver could
be, and began to implement safety laws such as speed limits.
_____________________________9_____________________________
"Israelis fume
over smoking ban on army bases"
The Forward
(02/29/08) Nathan Jeffay
http://www.forward.com/articles/12803/
Israel's legislature
has enacted a smoking prohibition in all indoor areas on Israel
Defense Forces (IDF) bases, to curb the habit before it starts.
"With a ban on army bases, I believe army culture will change and
you will see fewer and fewer people in Israel smoking, as fewer
people are taking up the habit as soldiers," said Yoel Hasson, a
legislator who pushed the IDF ban after helping to enact a ban on
smoking in other public places (e.g., restaurants) six months ago.
Historically, cigarettes have been at the center of day-to-day life
in the IDF, said Baruch Levi, head of the Israel Defense Forces
Veterans Association. "In the first days of the IDF, they were distributed
formally. They are part and parcel of the culture. In times of tension,
when decisions needed making and plans formulating, it was done
among smoke," Levi said. Many soldiers in the IDF are angered by
the ban. "I cannot believe that we are being told that one of the
few ways of relieving stress is against the rules," said a solder
from Haifa. "We will ignore this." Soldier-opponents of the measure
say that it will be difficult to enforce the ban because many high-ranking
officers smoke and because it will make the IDF inefficient. "It
will end up wasting a lot of time, because people will end up demanding
breaks to go outside and smoke every three minutes," said Orahn
Press-Bloom, a former IDF soldier. The prohibition takes effect
this summer.
_____________________BRIEFLY NOTED______________________
Alaska: Coastal
village files suit against companies for greenhouse gases
"On the brink,
village fights back"
International Herald
Tribune (02/28/08)
Felicity Barringer
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/27/america/27alaska.php
California: Agency
releases document explaining emissions decision
"EPA to state:
it's global warming, not California"
Associated Press
(02/29/08) Erica Werner
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-waiver1mar01,0,4048681.story
California: Officials
attempt to overcome stigma associated with subsidized lunch
"Free school lunch
isn't cool, so some students go hungry"
New York Times
(03/01/08) Carol Pogash
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/education/01lunch.html?em&ex=1204520400&en=1f1231653
d9794b2&ei=5087
California: Appeals
court says CA needs permission to regulate port pollution
"Court rejects
California limits on ship emissions"
Los Angeles Times
(02/28/08) Marla Cone
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ships28feb28,0,213846.story
Idaho: Groups agree
to plan for controlled burning to exceed federal standards
"New ID field burning
pact includes strict limits, public notice"
Idaho Statesman
(02/25/08)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420ap_id_field_burning.html
Massachusetts:
As 200,000 get insurance, "free care" drops 16 percent
"Decline is seen
in use of free care"
Boston Globe
(03/03/08) Alice Dembner
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/03/decline_is_seen_in_use_of_free_care/
Massachusetts:
State credits tobacco control program, indoor smoking ban for decline
"Teenage cigarette
use drops in Mass."
Boston Globe
(02/27/08) Stephen Smith
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/27/teenage_cigarette_use_drops_in_mass/
Nebraska: Ban takes
effect June 1, 2009
"Nebraska's new
smoke ban tougher than most states'"
Omaha World-Herald
(02/27/08) Leslie Reed
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10268586
New Jersey: Law
makes cell phone use a primary offense
"New Jersey begins
tighter phone rules for drivers"
New York Times (03/02/08)
Nate Schweber
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/nyregion/02law.html
North Carolina:
State has enough evidence of health problems from power plant emissions
"Judge OKs TVA
suit for trial"
Asheville Citizen-Times
(02/29/08) Clarke Morrison
http://citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200880228062&source=rss
Virginia: Legislature
sends bill to Gov. Kaine
"Bill requires
colleges to have emergency plan"
Associated Press
(02/27/08) Richmond Digest
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/26/AR2008022603216.html
West Virginia:
Judge upholds $196.2 M punitive damages, $130 M for medical monitoring
"Judge stands by
damages award against DuPont in class action"
Associated Press
(02/26/08)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120403987986093811.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
National: Congress
probes CDC delay of Great Lakes contamination report
"Congressional
panel calls for release of CDC report about the Great Lakes"
Chicago Tribune
(02/29/08) James Janega
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-lakesstudyfeb29,1,2189605.story
National: Asbestos
limits for miners now in line with standard for other industries
"MSHA toughens
limit on asbestos exposure"
Associated Press
(03/01/08)
http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=7955793
National: Federal
auditors find weak safety standards reported in 2003
"School lunch at
risk for years"
Wall Street Journal
(03/03/08) Elizabeth Williamson
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120450993822606723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
National: Bill
would improve screening and mental health programs
"Senate passes
bill to improve health care on Indian reservations"
Associated Press
(02/27/08) Mary Clare Jalonick
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6600ap_wst_congress_indian_health.html
Australia: New
guidelines send HIV+ people who have unprotected sex to police
"Police to be told
about reckless HIV acts"
The Age
(02/26/08) Julia Medew
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/police-to-be-told-about-reckless-hiv-acts/2008/02/25/120378
8246905.html
Canada: Parents
cite autism concerns for failure to vaccinate
"Baby of hep B
mother must be vaccinated, judge rules"
National Post
(02/27/08) Tom Blackwell
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=336429
Canada: New licensing
plan will bring strict regulations to sausage making
"Regulations kill
piece of Ottawa Valley's culinary heritage"
Pembroke Observer
(02/27/08) Marie Zettler
http://www.thedailyobserver.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=919585
Japan: Government
to be sued for failure to warn
"Group plans to
sue government over inaction on asbestos"
Yomiuri Shimbun
(02/28/08)
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20080229TDY02310.htm
Uganda: Appeals
Court upholds smoking ban against challenge by ex-BAT official
"Smoking in public
remains banned"
Weekly Observer
(02/28/08) Irene Kiiza
http://allafrica.com/stories/200802280647.html
United Kingdom:
NHS advisory body guidelines recommend patches for kids
"Child nicotine
patches approved"
BBC News
(02/27/08)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7265607.stm
__________PHL NEWS QUOTATION OF THE WEEK___________
"The automobile
is here to slay."
-- A news story
headline, circa 1930, on the rising number of people killed by automobiles.
Laws and regulations governing vehicle standards, driver licensing,
and road safety were enacted in response to tens of thousands of
deaths. [See item 8, above.]
_________THE MONTHLY QUIZ: FEBRUARY
2008_________
Welcome to the Monthly Quiz! To win,
be the first reader to answer all the quiz questions correctly.
The winner will be recognized in the News (if you prefer
not to be recognized, please let us know).
Each quiz contains questions from
News stories and other content published in February 2008 (for
past issues, visit
http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/dailynews/default.asp
). Check next week's issue of the News for the correct answers.
Submit your answers by email to
cseely@cdc.gov.
For each of the following questions,
choose the one best answer.
1. Paint manufacturers in _________ asked
the state Supreme Court to overturn a jury verdict that found them
liable for creating a public nuisance with their lead-based paints.
(February 6, 2008 issue)
A. California
B. Iowa
C. Ohio
D. Rhode Island
2. In 2007, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey,
and Oregon passed ___________________. (February 13, 2008 issue)
A. smoking bans
B. cyberbullying laws
C. trans fat restrictions
D. universal health care
3. A state senator in Washington recently
introduced a bill that would require convicted drunk drivers to
place fluorescent-yellow license plates on their cars for one year.
True or False? (February 20, 2008 issue)
A. True
B. False
4. The U.S. Supreme Court held that federal
law preempts Maine's regulations for online sales of ____________________.
(February 27, 2008 issue)
A. tobacco products
B. prescription medication
C. raw milk
D. none of the above
___________________________________________________________
The CDC Public
Health Law News is published each Wednesday except holidays,
plus special issues when warranted. It is distributed only in electronic
form and is free of charge. News content is selected
solely on the basis of newsworthiness and potential interest to
readers. CDC and DHHS assume no responsibility for the factual accuracy
of the items presented. The selection, omission, or content of items
does not imply any endorsement or other position taken by CDC or
DHHS. Opinions expressed by the original authors of items included
in the News, or persons quoted therein, are strictly their
own and are in no way meant to represent the opinion or views of
CDC or DHHS. References to products, trade names, publications,
news sources, and non-CDC Websites are provided solely for informational
purposes and do not imply endorsement by CDC or DHHS. Legal cases
are presented for educational purposes only, and are not meant to
represent the current state of the law. The findings and conclusions
in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
represent the views of CDC. The News is in the public domain
and may be freely forwarded and reproduced without permission. The
original news sources and the CDC Public Health Law News
should be cited as sources. Readers should contact the cited news
sources for the full text of the articles.
For past issues
or to subscribe to the weekly CDC Public Health Law News,
visit http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/cphln.asp.
For help with subscriptions or to make comments or suggestions,
send an email to Rachel Weiss at
rweiss@cdc.gov.
The News
is published by the Public Health Law Program, Office of the Chief
of Public Health Practice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Rachel
Weiss, J.D., Editor; Christopher Seely, J.D., Associate Editor;
Karen L. McKie, J.D., M.L.S., Editorial Advisor.
See More news... here. Recommend PHL News
|