Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:11:32 EDT
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         [log in to unmask]
Subject:      Re: Storage of audio CDs (preservation by distribution)
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In a message dated 10/4/2005 2:33:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, stevenc@INTERLINKS.NET writes: [log in to unmask] writes: As I understand it, it would be the users, not Google, who would be violating copyright...at least this is how it works with 51-year-old recordings, which are off copyright in Canada but not in the US! OTOH, I'm not a copyright lawyer... Steven C. Barr ***************\ It is not clear to me that I am the one violating copyright if I buy a release of a 51 year old recording from a Canadian vendor or if I download a 51 year old book from an Australian website. Of course the vendor or site owner may prohibit such distribution to protect themselves but it is up to them to enforce such a prohibition or at least to make it clear that they don't support distribution in those countries that restrict it. Of course I can't redistribute this material in the country in which it is illegal to do so without permission. OTOH, I'm not a copyright lawyer... Mike Csontos


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager