Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:00:07 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: LoC and war reporting
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I think you're right about a half-track and OTM got that wrong, too. So I should have been more scathing about their reporting! They described the half-track as the vehicle that got Marines from the ships over the reefs to the beach. I don't think M-3 Halftracks were capable of that duty, but I might be wrong. I'd think you'd use standard landing craft but maybe there's more to that story. This was the Guam landing. OK, some googling leads me to believe that what was actually used by the 2nd Marines to invade Guam were Amphtracks,- not halftracks. Perhaps the recordist (who was an embedded journalist) remembered wrong or perhaps Marines on the ground called the Amphtracks halftracks. Here's a definition of an Amphtrack: http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Landing_Vehicle_Tracked Not the source for this is Whacky-Packia, so I might be amplifying some mythology, so believe with care. However, here are some pictures, allegedly: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ships/LVT/LVT.html and they definitely do not look like halftracks. Man, I'd sure hate to look out of my machine gun nest and see a horizon full of these things headed toward my beach! ---- Original Message ----- From: "George Brock-Nannestad" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:34 PM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] LoC and war reporting > From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad > > Tom Fine wrote: > > > > Also, they were guessing about what a half-track is. Come on, don't those > > folks know how to use Google? > > ----- when I collected Matchbox models (1959) I never bought military > vehicles. But a half-track was a truck (lorry to the English) with ordinary > front wheels but tank-like tracks where the rear wheels would have been. > Ready knowledge is better than Google. > > ----- Apart from this, I wanted the transcript and was informed by the > website that it would not be available until Tuesday afternoon. > > Kind regards, > > > George


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager