Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 6 Oct 2005 22:36:40 -0700
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Curatorial Responsibility, formerly Copyright of treasures
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <00a301c5caef$5e41eb20$bd4efea9@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

matt Sohn wrote: > This brings up an > interesting question. If a soloist or conductor is unhappy with a > performance and nixes distribution, isn't every musician who performed on > the work entitled to a copy of their performance? Not by law. At best, all of those with rights have signed them over to the producing organization. In that case, that organization decides who may have copies of what. Mike -- [log in to unmask] http://www.mrichter.com/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager