Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 9 May 2005 09:12:39 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Cataloging sound recordings
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <427BAB72.31029.2031964@localhost>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 6 May 2005, George Brock-Nannestad wrote: > So, instead of bashing the old systems for their content, let us find ways to > translate their fields into new fields in new systems. Interactive entry > would automatically enter the various delimiters that are so typical of the > old systems. They were needed, because the logic to control the print codes > for the cards intended for searching was quite primitive. By all means, do > still use them, but get a better interface for entry. If there isn't a form of interactive entry, why? I believe I understand the differentiation between the format (MARC), rules for entry (AACR) and the interfaces for both the user and the cataloger. It seems to me that all of these functions need to be viewed systemically, and not in isolation. For example, it seems to me that AACR 2 exists to feed the MARC format. The MARC format, in turn, determines the information sets available to the user interfaces. However, there are new components in the system, most importantly, the computer, which can free us to some degree, from the linearity of our information systems of the past. Then we have the added consideration of the exponential growth of information, coupled with a huge backlog of a body of uncataloged information, sound recordings, that, until fairly recently, were considered ephemeral by libraries. True, some institutions decided early on that recordings should be a part of libraries, but consider how most Universities relegated recordings collections to the music department...for example, at this University, it was only about 30 years ago that the Library took over responsibility for the recordings collection. As for the notion of bashing... I like to think of it of as questioning. Karl


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager