Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 5 May 2005 09:53:02 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Steven Smolian <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Cataloging sound recordings
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original

Please remember, my proposal, etc., is to meet the needs of private collectors first. Card based thinking, even when using the computer, is only a baby step toward what the computer can do. Cataloging has to be rethought to give people what they have a right to expect, no matter how painful it may be to those rooted in old ways of doing things. MARC has always been a kludgy compromise. Steve Smolian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Snyder" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:43 AM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cataloging sound recordings > > > Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Subject: > Re: Cataloging sound recordings > On Wed, 4 May 2005, Matt Snyder wrote: > >>What do you see as being the function of the MARC record? > > Whether the repository in question has a particular item, and, via the > rules of descriptive cataloging, what that item says about itself. If the > record sleeve or cd insert doesn't say who was conducting the Beethoven > piano concerto, or was on drums for this Henry Mancini recording session, > or whatever other particular information you're looking for, the MARC > record will not contain it. But, if such information is available to > someone doing discographical research, that data will go into a > discography. Catalogs contain info about sound containers, and can have no > information other than what is on those containers. Discographies (and I'm > speaking of session-based discography), suck up as much information as is > available to the discographer. > > Matt Snyder > Music Archivist > Wilson Processing Project > The New York Public Library > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/2005


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager