Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 23 May 2005 07:19:37 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Damien Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Digital recorder for transferring LP collection
Comments: To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

You could record to your computer and from there burn a CD. It would be one big track, though, unless you want to change your mind on recording each track individually and burning an audio CD from multiple tracks. What do you consider to be time-consuming? Doing it this way would not take me much more effort than hitting play, record and stop and listening while recording. CD burning software makes it easy to compile collections onto a single disc. Damien J. Moody Information Technology Services Library of Congress >>> [log in to unmask] 05/21/05 12:39 PM >>> I have a home collection of classical LPs in excellent condition, and I would like to transfer them to CDs for convenience and to avoid record wear. I just want to get them transferred with moderate effort, and with little or no digital reprocessing. I just want to transfer one or two at a time as I feel like listening to them, so I'm not talking about an industrial scale. I have good playback equipment, cleaning equipment, and a freestanding home CD recorder. The intention is to record onto CD-R/W disks and copy onto CD-R blanks. The weak link is definitely the CD recorder. The sound quality is good, but the automatic track mark insertion is completely unacceptable. It misses the beginning of every band, and it inserts a lot of spurious track marks. Manual insertion takes several seconds. Piecing the tracks together on the computer takes a prohibitive amount of time. Suggestions? It has to be reliable, and it must be of CD or LP quality. I've done a little homework, and home recorders don't look too promising. I would consider an inexpensive freestanding professional recorder, maybe $700 or less. Or recording on a laptop computer (price can be higher because I get the use of the computer too). I would also consider recording to another format with lossless compression. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager