Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2004)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:43:04 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Steven C. Barr" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Archive the hard drive, was CDR media longevity
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Seubert" <[log in to unmask]> > I may have mentioned this before in this forum, but the UCSB Library stores > its digital content on disc arrays from Wideband Systems that run RAID 5. > We currently have 9TB of digital data in the Alexandria Digital Library, > mostly geospatial data and air photos, but soon audio with our cylinder > digitization project. Even with RAID 5, we have had a simultaneous failure > of multiple hard drives, which required restoring the drives from tape > backup. We have 40TB of tape backup and we also backup to the San Diego > Supercomputer Center. Imagine what happens when the hard drive fails (and > they will) and you don't have an alternate backup. It's gone. It would appear that we have to be like the chap who wore both belt and suspenders! We know that storage media have a specific and non-infinite life span...we also know (I do, from bitter experience) that active storage media (i.e. hard drives) have a similar non-eternal expectancy. Further, we know that the original information usually is in a non-eternal form, even ignoring the possibility of disaster (the shellac record may be the closest thing to long-term indestructibility) In fact, I have seen a number of 19th-century tombstones that prove the fallacy of "carved in stone!" We could convert the data to digital form as accurately as possible, and then store it on both hard drives and CD-R or DVD-R, using each of the two as sources for regularm refreshing of the other. Alternatively, we could perfect shellac DVD-R's...? Steven C. Barr


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager