Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2004)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:11:13 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Fw: Victor and COlumbia
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

----- Forwarded by Dick Spottswood/dick/AmericanU on 01/02/2004 11:11 AM ----- Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: <[log in to unmask]> 01/02/2004 10:59 AM Please respond to "tlist" To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] cc: Subject: Fw: Victor and COlumbia Dear Pekka, I think that all the uproar about music downloading has made record companies more paranoid than ever, and public access to historical material is the last thing on their mind. Recent decreases in profits, corporate mergers etc. have also tended to feed the bar-the-door mentality. Let's hope it's temporary--and let's hope that legislators in the US and elsewhere will begin to understand the problems that denial of access creates. Certainly record companies are for-profit operations, not public institutions, but their increasing control and monopolization over these aspects of our cultural resources is a critical problem that requires legislative action, unless voluntary reforms are forthcoming. As I'm sure you know, metal masters were melted down to support the war effort in the 1940s, and many no longer exist. CBS still has a lot of foreign language masters from the 1920s-30s, but many metal parts for early jazz, blues and country material are extinct, because record companies placed no value on them in the 1940s. Thanks for the suggestion of eliminating special characters from an online EMOR discography. The problem is that I'd then have to go back through the entire text to remove the ones already there! I'll circulate this to ARSC and tlist members to see if I can elicit any responses. Happy 2004, Dick Pekka Gronow is an archivist, discographer and record producer in Helsinki. I'll forward answers and observations to him. ----- Forwarded by Dick Spottswood/dick/AmericanU on 01/02/2004 10:36 AM ----- [log in to unmask] 01/02/2004 09:08 AM To: Dick Spottswood <[log in to unmask]> cc: Subject: Victor and COlumbia Happy new year ! It does not look bad so far, bright sun and a nice icy breeze. I may have told you that the EMI archive at Hayes have fired all their old staff, people who were willing to cooperate with researchers. The new management does not want any outside access. We have been wondering at IASA whether we could put some organized pressure on the company, after all they have records from all the old world countries since a hundred years, in some cases unique items. How is the situation in the US ? I know access has always been a problem, but how much pre- WW2 archival material do the old companies actually have ? My guess is that EMI has about 80 - 90 per cent of all pre-war production, but some items have broken and others just never got there. The seven-inch Scandinavian Zonophone 70 000 series, for instance, is missing,. but the later ten-inch 70000 series (different discs) is there. Many major operatic items were apparently stolen in the 1950s. CBS had metal parts, even of unissued stuff, and in the 1970s we even persuaded CBS Finland to issue an LP of Hiski Salomaa records, for which they were able to obtain master tapes from New York (from metal parts). If we consider the total output of US Columbia and Victor, 1900-1945, how much of this do the companies themselves have preserved, approximately (five, ten or fifty per cent? ). Where is it now ? Has there ever been any talk of the companies depositing it to LC ? If they do not have much, no need to make it an issue ? Incidentally, speaking of your ethnic records discography and the problems of putting all those stange letters on the internet ? I realise to do it really right would be very difficult, but did you consider the possibility of reducing the text to the standard English alphabet, just leaving out all the umlauts etc ? It would still be useful in that way, and it might be possible to create a conversion program to do this "simplification"? I am asking because there are people around who miught be persuaded to do it for fun ? Pekka


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager