Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:04:13 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: 78rpm cartridges and postprocessing
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Shure SC-35 cartridge (stereo) with an SS78E stylus, if you can find one. I don't recommend the after-market versions of that stylus and the N78S is useless. dl Jos Van Dyck wrote: > What cartridges would you recommend for 78 transcriptions? > > Shure M78S > Stanton 681 + D6827 stylus > Ortofon OM78, Concorde 78 > Grado 78C, 78E > EMT TND65, OFD65 (mono) > > Most modern cartridges have stereo output. The EMT MC cartridges are mono. > Which is better for postprocessing? > Pros/cons for stereo vs. mono cartridge? > > Jos


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager