Date:Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:54:10 -0500
Reply-To:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
From:Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: any Ellington discography experts in the house?
Comments:To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Mike:
There was no "Fine Sound Studios" in October 1957, so that is wrong wherever
that's listed. I was particularly interested in the accuracy regarding the
Reprise sessions in the 60s. I do not own that multi-CD complete Reprise
recordings set so I don't know if the book in that box set is parallel to
that website.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] any Ellington discography experts in the house?
> At 08:30 PM 11/7/2005, Tom Fine wrote:
> >http://www.depanorama.net/
> >
> >does anyone know how accurate this guy's session info is? He cites
several
> >published discographies on his home page but that doesn't necessarily
mean
> >much.
>
> Fortunately for you, Ellington is the single most-studied jazz
> artist, so there are numerous published sources and many freaks who
> will actually care about minutia. The two primary discographies are
> "Ellingtonia" by W. E. Timner and "Duke Ellington's Story On Records"
> by Massagli et al. It seems that these are where the website info
> came from. I strongly doubt that there was significant independent
> research done regarding the sessions (as opposed to the issues).
>
> Was there some specific question you had? Does it perhaps relate to
> the late June and early October 1957 sessions at "Fine Sound Studios"
> because this is that tricky interim period. I own Timner and he does
> say "Fine Studios" for all those dates. I don't own DESOR.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> mike at JazzDiscography.com
> http://www.JazzDiscography.com
