Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2008)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:45:51 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Steven C. Barr" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cox" <[log in to unmask]> > On 24/10/08, Bob Olhsson wrote: >> -----Original Message----- From Tom Fine: "...I definitely believe >> that part of the business cratering is due to putting out an >> overpriced, bad quality product in a format that has been >> antiquated..." >> I totally agree about bad quality but strongly disagree with the idea >> that music recordings are overpriced. Factoring in inflation, >> prerecorded music is by far the cheapest it has ever been. >> The problem is what people get for their 15 to 20 bucks which is >> shoddy packaging, horrendous audio quality and too few great >> performances of great material. There is no evidence that lower prices >> will increase sales while everything points to the fact that people >> will gladly pay a premium for any recording they consider worthy of >> purchase. Too many labels and artists got lazy and greedy during the >> CD era. They are now reaping what was sown. Selling the same garbage >> at a lower price is not a solution! > I think people will spend a certain amount on recordings. The price > decides how many hours of music they get for that money. > The horrendous audio quality is IMO mainly confined to pop music, and to > super-budget compilations of material such as 1950s pop. The standard in > classical music is high. The jazz I buy is mainly transfers from analog, > and recent transfers from tape are often better than I have ever heard > (this on material I know well on LP). > Packaging varies. Naxos manages to provide informative booklets even at > a low retail price (however, they are no longer a super-budget label). > Brilliant Classics have moved toward PDF files on a CD for their > extremely cheap box sets. > I have been able to buy some VERY nice CD's for $1 each, at a $1-store chain called "Dollarama" (at least here in Ont'o.!). I have also run across a fair number of 10-CD, 200-track sets for Cdn$21.99...which take full advantage of the standard NON-US Of A 50-year term for copyright of sound recordings! Note that I cannot speak for their audio quality...being partially deaf after two serious head injuries and a number of years playing harmonica on stage while standing WAY too close to Fender Twins turned up to ear-destroying levels...! In times to come, I shall figure out how to transfer my half-vast shellac archive into digital form...thus making innumerable ancient recordings available to an anxious public...!! Now...should I start with "The Complete Recorded Works Of the Taylor Trio"...or "The Greatest Hits Of 19 and 12?!" :-) Steven C. Barr


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager