Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2008)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:10:57 +0000
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain

On 21/10/08, George Brock-Nannestad wrote: > So it is a continuum of development, and it is only when a technology > is completely discarded (such as coarse-groove 78 rpm) that the > foundations that that technology was resting on get forgotten, and > later generations will not be an improvement. There has been no > fundamental improvement of coarse-groove 78 rpm reproduction since > 1948, even though later technology has been tweaked into service. > I think the current work on optical scanning of 78s may lead to a fundamental improvement. Regards -- Don Cox [log in to unmask]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager