ARSCLIST Archives – October 2008
"A 440 Records" 1950's lp's
Re: "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's
(32 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:11:12 -0400
Re: "A 440 Records" 1950's lp's
(35 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:58:10 -0400
"A 440 Records" 1950's lp's
(22 lines)
From:
Thomas Stern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:39:03 -0400
$750 Stipend Deadline Approaching - SF AV Media Preservation Program in October
$750 Stipend Deadline Approaching - SF AV Media Preservation Program in October
(116 lines)
From:
Andrews, Kim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:19:45 -0400
(no subject)
(no subject)
(12 lines)
From:
J. E. Schmidt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:37:38 -0600
1941 Tannhauser wanted
Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted
(73 lines)
From:
G. W. Ulrich Sieveking <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:23:13 +0200
Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted
(59 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:31:27 -0400
Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted
(52 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:08:39 -0700
Re: 1941 Tannhauser wanted
(43 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:56:26 -0700
1941 Tannhauser wanted
(34 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:20:23 -0400
45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(36 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:04:18 -0700
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(54 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:38:07 -0700
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(42 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:18:11 -0400
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(27 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:37:59 -0700
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(39 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:49:33 -0700
Re: 45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(36 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:39:40 -0700
45rpm sound quality with respect to their 33rpm counterpart?
(25 lines)
From:
D. Blake Werts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:57:04 -0400
78 & 33 rpm record auction/Schallplattenauktion
78 & 33 rpm record auction/Schallplattenauktion
(33 lines)
From:
Birgit Lotz Verlag <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:22:10 +0200
78-L rebooted
Re: 78-L rebooted
(37 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:38:02 -0400
Re: 78-L rebooted
(27 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:21:54 -0700
Re: 78-L rebooted
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:03:55 -0400
Re: 78-L rebooted
(30 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:19:10 -0500
Re: 78-L rebooted
(29 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:02:03 -0400
78-L rebooted
(21 lines)
From:
Malcolm Rockwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:57:04 -1000
<No subject>
<No subject>
(26 lines)
From:
MATSUBAYASHI, 'Shaolin' Kohji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:20:12 +0900
<No subject>
(13 lines)
From:
Suzanne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:06:30 -0400
Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon
Re: Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon
(81 lines)
From:
Thomas Stern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:19:49 -0400
Re: Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon
(68 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:21:11 +0100
Aberdeen Music Hall - Harry Gordon
(18 lines)
From:
Thomas Stern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:27:18 -0400
Absolute Polarity
Re: Absolute Polarity
(30 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:24:17 -0700
Re: Absolute Polarity
(38 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:53:51 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(35 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:34:28 -0700
Re: Absolute Polarity
(61 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:12:30 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(148 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:10:18 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(39 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:33:54 -0700
Re: Absolute Polarity
(128 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:17:35 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(114 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:14:11 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(94 lines)
From:
Goran Finnberg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:16:43 +0200
Re: Absolute Polarity
(46 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:35:19 -0700
Re: Absolute Polarity
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Shoshani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:40:39 -0500
Re: Absolute Polarity
(33 lines)
From:
Parker Dinkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:49 -0500
Re: Absolute Polarity
(46 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:18:59 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(107 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:21:08 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(32 lines)
From:
Robert Cham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:35:29 -0500
Re: Absolute Polarity
(52 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:29:33 -0700
Re: Absolute Polarity
(24 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:30:08 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(53 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:49:23 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(33 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:45:24 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(24 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:46:25 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(51 lines)
From:
Parker Dinkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:01:08 -0500
Re: Absolute Polarity
(41 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:43:47 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(74 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:46:21 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(42 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:42:15 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(67 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:08:58 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:46:13 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(25 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:34:03 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(132 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:41:12 -0400
Re: Absolute Polarity
(58 lines)
From:
Jerry Hartke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:20:05 -0400
Absolute Polarity
(42 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:02:26 -0400
Announcement: New Website for Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative
Announcement: New Website for Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative
(48 lines)
From:
Marsha Maguire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:50:08 -0400
Aren't recordings original ..... Blah! NOT CABLES THIS TIME!
Re: Aren't recordings original ..... Blah! NOT CABLES THIS TIME!
(138 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:51:15 +0200
Aren't recordings original sources?
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(72 lines)
From:
Goran Finnberg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:49:15 +0200
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(69 lines)
From:
Scott Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:33:35 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(37 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:09:13 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(111 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:23:35 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(57 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:30:57 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(67 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:16:57 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(43 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:11:39 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(75 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:38:19 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(80 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:22:43 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(77 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:14:41 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(53 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:55:36 +0200
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(68 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:03:42 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(52 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:29:35 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(126 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:25:26 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(50 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:18:33 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(110 lines)
From:
Larry S Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:16:36 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(33 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:08:00 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(65 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:03:53 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(101 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:00:05 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(99 lines)
From:
Larry S Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:55:40 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(80 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:52:59 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(223 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:45:04 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(42 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:50 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(35 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:39:19 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(153 lines)
From:
Steve Abrams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:59 +0100
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(28 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:10:57 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(77 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:08:10 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(106 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:07:52 +0200
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(71 lines)
From:
Steve Abrams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:58:03 +0100
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(52 lines)
From:
Robert J Hodge <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:21:10 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(52 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:22:06 +0200
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(81 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:16:51 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(153 lines)
From:
Larry S Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:20:56 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(32 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:20:41 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(39 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:30:02 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(357 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:23:02 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(73 lines)
From:
J. E. Schmidt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:23:41 -0600
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(35 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:03:15 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(63 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:30:00 +0000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(283 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:30:41 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(44 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:59:01 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(262 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:50:37 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(23 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:30:49 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(30 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:44:16 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(207 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:13:15 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(168 lines)
From:
David Goren <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:03:54 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(159 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:43:03 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(134 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:29:39 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(442 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:43:06 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(208 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:18:59 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(109 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:41:49 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(93 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:27:00 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(83 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:31:59 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(95 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:06:47 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(312 lines)
From:
Scott Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:01:50 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(128 lines)
From:
Aaron Levinson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:23:54 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(44 lines)
From:
Dale Francis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:06:58 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(81 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:57:48 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(78 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:34:34 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(101 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:28:11 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(104 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:17:22 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(88 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:08:19 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(64 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:03:26 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(87 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:53:36 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(44 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:44:33 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(27 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:41:04 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(70 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:35:25 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(43 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:41 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(208 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:15:51 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(85 lines)
From:
Malcolm Rockwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:09:43 -1000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(48 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:21:33 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(71 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:28:23 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(56 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:18:24 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(48 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:21:46 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(54 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:05:29 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(35 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:31:06 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(66 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:12 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(70 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:10:37 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(44 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:59:08 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(27 lines)
From:
John Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:19:38 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(64 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:17:31 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(46 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:50:42 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(99 lines)
From:
Malcolm Rockwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:46:32 -1000
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(85 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:19:25 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(179 lines)
From:
Scott Phillips <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:49:55 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(275 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:42:58 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Sam <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:27:36 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(109 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:07:35 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(70 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:57:12 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(40 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:47:09 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(30 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:06:20 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(108 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:01:46 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(63 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:00:07 -0500
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(81 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:22:53 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(42 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:50:34 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(104 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:07:10 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(50 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:53:09 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(58 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:09:53 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(75 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:32:42 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(59 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:22:49 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(34 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:14:21 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(56 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:33:00 -0700
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(68 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:21:19 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(54 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:01:04 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(106 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:27:27 +0200
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(51 lines)
From:
Patrick Feaster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:24:01 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(152 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:32:18 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(104 lines)
From:
Marie O'Connell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:12:05 +1300
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(57 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:52:00 -0400
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(113 lines)
From:
Marie O'Connell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:22:25 +1300
Re: Aren't recordings original sources?
(44 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:14:22 -0700
Aren't recordings original sources?
(86 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:44:22 -0700
ARSC Awards: 2008 Winners
ARSC Awards: 2008 Winners
(294 lines)
From:
Bill Klinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:52:48 -0400
ARSC Journal needed..repeat
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(42 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:45:02 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(30 lines)
From:
Randy Watts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:22:24 -0700
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(40 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:39:18 -0700
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(54 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:53:34 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(48 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:19:33 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(71 lines)
From:
Farrington, Jim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:44:01 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(51 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:28:34 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(38 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:27:07 -0400
Re: ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(38 lines)
From:
Farrington, Jim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:54:47 -0400
ARSC Journal needed..repeat
(19 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:48:10 -0400
ARSC Preservation Grants Program 2009
ARSC Preservation Grants Program 2009
(80 lines)
From:
Bill Klinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:42:21 -0400
ARSC Research Grants Program 2009
ARSC Research Grants Program 2009
(94 lines)
From:
Bill Klinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400
Article on a lawsuit related to illegal downloading
Article on a lawsuit related to illegal downloading
(24 lines)
From:
Karl Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:29 -0700
Audograph disc
Re: Audograph disc
(69 lines)
From:
Robert J Hodge <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:56:47 -0400
Re: Audograph disc
(50 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:29:54 -0400
Re: Audograph disc
(29 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:37:23 -0400
Re: Audograph disc
(75 lines)
From:
Eric Jacobs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:14:18 -0700
Re: Audograph disc
(42 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:26:32 -0700
Audograph disc
(24 lines)
From:
Stewart Adam <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:40:25 -0400
BASF LH 60
Re: BASF LH 60
(98 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:58:11 +0100
Re: BASF LH 60
(49 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:20:48 -0400
Re: BASF LH 60
(99 lines)
From:
Marie OConnell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:01:29 +1300
Re: BASF LH 60
(53 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:26:35 -0400
Re: BASF LH 60
(55 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:38:18 -0400
Re: BASF LH 60
(26 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:29:58 +0100
Re: BASF LH 60
(66 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:23:34 +0100
Re: BASF LH 60
(54 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:13:55 -0400
Re: BASF LH 60
(62 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:02:29 -0400
BASF LH 60
(53 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:42:33 +0100
Broadcast transcription discs
Broadcast transcription discs
(54 lines)
From:
Rodriguez, Sandy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:55:37 -0500
Brunswick dating
Re: Brunswick dating
(31 lines)
From:
Paul Charosh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:22:16 EDT
Brunswick dating
(17 lines)
From:
Anthony Barnett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:29:52 +0000
Canfield Guide
Re: Canfield Guide
(38 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:52:27 -0700
Canfield Guide
(18 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:09:31 -0400
Capitol 50-60s ledgers??
Re: Capitol 50-60s ledgers??
(22 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:29:17 -0400
Re: Capitol 50-60s ledgers??
(39 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:14:38 -0700
Cassette players
Re: Cassette players
(36 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:35:02 +0000
Re: Cassette players
(38 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:21:09 -0400
Re: Cassette players
(81 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:32:25 -0400
Re: Cassette players
(20 lines)
From:
David Goren <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:05:00 -0500
Re: Cassette players
(123 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:34:43 -0400
Cassette players
(48 lines)
From:
McLane, Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:52:13 -0400
Cassette players (and in-house transfers versus outsourcing)
Re: Cassette players (and in-house transfers versus outsourcing)
(108 lines)
From:
Eric Jacobs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:19:00 -0700
Cassette players (pitch correction)
Re: Cassette players (pitch correction)
(36 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:38:59 +0000
Re: Cassette players (pitch correction)
(34 lines)
From:
Goran Finnberg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:50:21 +0200
Re: Cassette players (pitch correction)
(58 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:12:45 -0400
Re: Cassette players (pitch correction)
(41 lines)
From:
Eric Jacobs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:26:01 -0700
Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(65 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:45:51 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(51 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:50:40 +0000
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(215 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:47:46 +0200
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(244 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:18:28 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(141 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:57:59 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(183 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:48:17 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(207 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:44:59 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(35 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:40:07 -0500
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(140 lines)
From:
Steve Abrams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:21:53 +0100
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(140 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:06:26 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(115 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:54:39 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(102 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:02:02 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(72 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:29:38 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(57 lines)
From:
Parker Dinkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:20:34 -0500
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(46 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:53:58 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(79 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:22:03 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(29 lines)
From:
Parker Dinkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:52:51 -0500
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(24 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:12:11 -0400
Re: Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(47 lines)
From:
Graham Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:51:49 -0400
Cedar, was: Aren't recordings original sources?
(34 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:17:38 -0700
copyright and music libraries
Re: copyright and music libraries
(44 lines)
From:
Karl Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:51:11 -0700
copyright and music libraries
(34 lines)
From:
Gary R. Boye <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:14:10 -0400
Crest Records / Silver Crest
Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest
(32 lines)
From:
Erik Dix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:50:28 -0400
Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest
(50 lines)
From:
Erik Dix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:02:59 -0400
Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Michlin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:40:54 -0400
Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest
(47 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:28:05 -0700
Re: Crest Records / Silver Crest
(25 lines)
From:
Michael Fitzgerald <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:29:34 -0400
Crest Records / Silver Crest
(30 lines)
From:
Erik Dix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:07:40 -0400
Date/info ? NBC program transcriptions
Date/info ? NBC program transcriptions
(24 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:28:52 -0700
DVD-Video audio track ripper?
Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(63 lines)
From:
Lee Tran <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:50:21 -0500
Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(49 lines)
From:
Angie Dickinson Mickle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:06:26 -0600
Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(71 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:27:22 +0100
Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(65 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:10:42 +0100
Re: DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(33 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:55:33 -0700
DVD-Video audio track ripper?
(34 lines)
From:
Andy Kolovos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:15:12 -0400
ELP turntable/original recordings
Re: ELP turntable/original recordings
(53 lines)
From:
Charles Lawson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:44:16 -0400
Re: ELP turntable/original recordings
(127 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:33:25 -0700
Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings
Re: Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings
(50 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:36:05 -0700
Fishing -- old Epic Records classical listings
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:38:47 -0400
FM broadcasting way back when
Re: FM broadcasting way back when
(131 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:01:55 -0700
FM reception way back when
Re: FM reception way back when
(35 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:22:34 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(130 lines)
From:
Charles A. Richardson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:02:04 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(34 lines)
From:
George Brock-Nannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:03:34 +0200
Re: FM reception way back when
(93 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 01:55:22 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(39 lines)
From:
Michael Shoshani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:40:11 -0500
Re: FM reception way back when
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Cham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:09:41 -0500
Re: FM reception way back when
(76 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:45:19 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(55 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:33:33 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(25 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:08:01 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(116 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:21:22 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(115 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:00:07 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(104 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:29:08 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(132 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:31:00 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(73 lines)
From:
Michael H. Gray <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:37:17 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(40 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:08:38 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(68 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:05:56 -0700
Re: FM reception way back when
(37 lines)
From:
Michael Shoshani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:48:49 -0500
Re: FM reception way back when
(102 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:53:26 -0500
Re: FM reception way back when
(27 lines)
From:
Mark Durenberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:22:57 -0500
Re: FM reception way back when
(70 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:09:15 -0400
Re: FM reception way back when
(47 lines)
From:
David Weiner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:54:49 -0400
FM reception way back when
(23 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:59:17 -0400
FREE Three-day Jazz Conference in Philly NEXT WEEK!
FREE Three-day Jazz Conference in Philly NEXT WEEK!
(79 lines)
From:
Steve Ramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:51:50 EDT
Fw: Make sure MEPs hear your views on copyright term extension - get in touch today
Fw: Make sure MEPs hear your views on copyright term extension - get in touch today
(102 lines)
From:
Steve Abrams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:06:45 +0100
FW: Seats still available for upcoming SOLINET classes
FW: Seats still available for upcoming SOLINET classes
(34 lines)
From:
Leming, Jessica <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:39:25 -0400
Fwd: Call for Papers: Bibliographic Control of Audiovisual and Multimedia Materials, Milano, August 2009
Fwd: Call for Papers: Bibliographic Control of Audiovisual and Multimedia Materials, Milano, August 2009
(145 lines)
From:
Corinne Forstot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:06:41 -0700
Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:54:22 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(35 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:09:38 -0500
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(33 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:37:36 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(60 lines)
From:
Michael H. Gray <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:29:11 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(44 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:21:18 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(32 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:12:30 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(28 lines)
From:
Mark Durenberger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:42:14 -0500
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(199 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:18:53 -0400
Re: Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(182 lines)
From:
Prentice, Will <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:18:07 +0100
Fwd: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
(115 lines)
From:
Doug Pomeroy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:39:08 -0400
Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(19 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:26:29 -0700
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(45 lines)
From:
Dave Lewis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:08:15 -0700
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(29 lines)
From:
Don Cox <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:23:11 +0000
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(41 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:18:05 -0400
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(40 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:34:34 -0400
Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(23 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:58:48 -0400
Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Aren't recordings original sources?
(30 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:38:16 -0400
Help !!
Re: Help !!
(34 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:18:52 -0400
Help !!
(18 lines)
From:
J. E. Schmidt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:50:20 -0600
Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(76 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:06:08 -0400
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(51 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:04:40 -0400
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(106 lines)
From:
carlstephen koto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:48:12 -0700
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(115 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:29:14 -0400
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(81 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:25:18 -0400
Re: Hyperthreading (was Software for Mac)
(89 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:38:57 -0400
IMLS Doctoral Preservation Fellowships
IMLS Doctoral Preservation Fellowships
(48 lines)
From:
Ellen Cunningham-Kruppa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:07:22 -0500
Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(32 lines)
From:
Bob Olhsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:27:17 -0500
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(123 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:38:26 -0400
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(42 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:30:52 -0400
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(95 lines)
From:
Sam Brylawski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:57:53 -0400
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(32 lines)
From:
Frank Strauss <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:50:47 -0400
Re: Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(83 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:46:21 -0400
Jazz Loft to see the light of day...
(99 lines)
From:
Dave Nolan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:27:03 -0400
Kanawha Records - The Mandolin and other stuff
Kanawha Records - The Mandolin and other stuff
(20 lines)
From:
Thomas Stern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:23:23 -0400
LC NAVCC Job Opening: Preservation Specialist (Audio)
LC NAVCC Job Opening: Preservation Specialist (Audio)
(25 lines)
From:
Stephen C Leggett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:33:23 -0400
looking for supplies
Re: looking for supplies
(24 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:07:53 -0400
Re: looking for supplies
(24 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:57:31 -0700
Re: looking for supplies
(19 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:14:15 -0400
looking for supplies
(36 lines)
From:
Kevin Tripp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:46:37 -0800
Lysistrata Overture
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(61 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:46:41 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(16 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:41:03 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(50 lines)
From:
Michael H. Gray <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:24:26 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(43 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:00:41 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(29 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:05:33 -0700
Re: Lysistrata Overture
(38 lines)
From:
Punto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:56:43 -0400
Lysistrata Overture
(18 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:31:58 -0400
Lysistrata Overture (2)
Re: Lysistrata Overture (2)
(45 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:36:18 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture (2)
(44 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:23:44 -0400
Re: Lysistrata Overture (2)
(33 lines)
From:
Punto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:07:35 -0400
Mailing lists for Phonograph Cylinders
Re: Mailing lists for Phonograph Cylinders
(34 lines)
From:
D P Ingram <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:27:34 +0300
Mercury Perfect Presence records
Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records
(92 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:58:10 -0400
Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records
(74 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:45:28 -0400
Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records
(58 lines)
From:
MATSUBAYASHI, 'Shaolin' Kohji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:07:14 +0900
Re: Mercury Perfect Presence records
(42 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:14:05 -0400
Mercury Perfect Presence records
(27 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:48:55 -0400
Met Opera on the web
Met Opera on the web
(85 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:34:01 -0400
Meta comment with new subject line (public aspects of ARSCLIST)
Re: Meta comment with new subject line (public aspects of ARSCLIST)
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Jacobs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:49:43 -0700
Meta comment with new subject line.
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(41 lines)
From:
Brandon Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:07:56 -0700
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(85 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:59:16 -0400
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(31 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:50:44 -0700
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(58 lines)
From:
Bryan E Cornell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:30:36 -0400
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(37 lines)
From:
Steve Abrams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:43:10 +0100
Re: Meta comment with new subject line.
(100 lines)
From:
Marie O'Connell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:07:50 +1300
Meta comment with new subject line.
(50 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:36:06 -0700
Meta comment with new subject line. 1TB hard drives
Re: Meta comment with new subject line. 1TB hard drives
(130 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:11:21 -0700
mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt?
Re: mostly for laughs too-- audio in asphalt?
(258 lines)
From:
Matt Love <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:59:48 -0600
motion picture amps (optical sound)
motion picture amps (optical sound)
(22 lines)
From:
Jack Honeycutt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:19:57 -0700
Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra
Re: Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra
(33 lines)
From:
Charles Lawson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:43:10 -0400
Mutual Presents The National Symphony Orchestra
(33 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:54:55 -0700
Nakamichi 480 audio cassette deck
Nakamichi 480 audio cassette deck
(16 lines)
From:
m segal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:16:02 -0400
new low-priced record cleaner
new low-priced record cleaner
(20 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:02:20 -0400
new member
Re: new member
(64 lines)
From:
Brandon Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:01:21 -0700
new member
(24 lines)
From:
heather james <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:43:57 -0700
NTSC betamax players
Re: NTSC betamax players
(99 lines)
From:
Roger and Allison Kulp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:23:47 -0700
Re: NTSC betamax players
(70 lines)
From:
Erik Dix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:45:23 -0400
NTSC betamax players
(66 lines)
From:
Prentice, Will <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:13:36 +0100
NY area appraiser?
Re: NY area appraiser?
(36 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:55:36 -0400
NY area appraiser?
(22 lines)
From:
Andy Lanset <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:13:01 -0400
NY ARSC Meeting - 10/23 - 92nd Street Y
NY ARSC Meeting - 10/23 - 92nd Street Y
(156 lines)
From:
Dave Nolan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:49:47 -0400
October Issue of Black Grooves
October Issue of Black Grooves
(46 lines)
From:
Nelson-Strauss, Brenda <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:38:33 -0400
on record--presidential debates, 1908 style, first sound bites of presidential candidates
on record--presidential debates, 1908 style, first sound bites of presidential candidates
(29 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:53:19 -0400
on record: presidential debates 1908 style
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(52 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 23:27:14 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(34 lines)
From:
David Breneman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:41:12 -0700
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(47 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:28:50 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(68 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:25:12 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(42 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:37:09 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(43 lines)
From:
Sam Brylawski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:25:34 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(34 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:15:22 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(63 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:40:16 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(45 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 07:36:51 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(50 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 03:38:21 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:41:37 -0400
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(33 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:01:42 -0400
on record: presidential debates 1908 style
(36 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:01:10 -0400
on record: presidential debates 1908 style - The CD!!!
Re: on record: presidential debates 1908 style - The CD!!!
(38 lines)
From:
Steve Ramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:47:31 EDT
Philco radio programs
Re: Philco radio programs
(26 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:29:53 -0400
Philco radio programs
(20 lines)
From:
Steven Smolian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:59:08 -0400
Poor sound of modern recordings thread
Re: Poor sound of modern recordings thread
(62 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:37:09 -0700
Re: Poor sound of modern recordings thread
(48 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:35:35 -0400
Poor sound of modern recordings thread
(33 lines)
From:
Dave Radlauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:45:36 EDT
Problems with List server?
Problems with List server?
(74 lines)
From:
Rob Poretti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:01:10 -0400
Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes
Re: Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes
(103 lines)
From:
Sarah Cunningham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:13:38 -0500
Re: Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes
(125 lines)
From:
Eric Jacobs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:08:22 -0700
Proper storage of mylar/acetate tapes
(64 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:35:22 -0400
proposal
Re: proposal
(23 lines)
From:
Karen C Lund <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:06:28 -0400
proposal
(89 lines)
From:
Karen C Lund <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:42:42 -0400
Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
(60 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:35:46 -0700
Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
(49 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:05:23 -0700
Re: Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
(100 lines)
From:
Brandon Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:53:08 -0700
Purpose of ARSCList, was: looking for supplies
(46 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:36:34 -0700
Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s
Re: Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s
(28 lines)
From:
Michael H. Gray <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:58:12 -0400
Q on miking & mixing in the '30s & '40s
(18 lines)
From:
Clark Johnsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:11:45 -0400
Radionette Multirecorder... track configuration, anyone?
Radionette Multirecorder... track configuration, anyone?
(49 lines)
From:
Jacqueline von Arb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:32:30 +0200
RCA "X" label - 10inch series
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(22 lines)
From:
John Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 22:30:58 -0700
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(25 lines)
From:
Michael Fitzgerald <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:51:19 -0400
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(25 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:26:42 -0400
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(65 lines)
From:
Randy Watts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:47:37 -0700
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(47 lines)
From:
Warren, Richard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:14:15 -0400
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(33 lines)
From:
Michael Fitzgerald <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:01:58 -0400
RCA "X" label - 10inch series
(23 lines)
From:
Thomas Stern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:43:42 -0400
RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
(97 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:54:20 -0400
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
(91 lines)
From:
Randy Watts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:51:15 -0700
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
(62 lines)
From:
David Lennick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:45:21 -0400
Re: RCA "X" label - 10inch series Susan Reed
(102 lines)
From:
Randy Watts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:40:36 -0700
RCA 1950 custom pressing
Re: RCA 1950 custom pressing
(25 lines)
From:
Steven C. Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:06:25 -0400
RCA 1950 custom pressing
(15 lines)
From:
Anthony Barnett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:00:53 +0100
Registration Deadline Extended! Disaster program, Greater Hudson Valley, NY
Registration Deadline Extended! Disaster program, Greater Hudson Valley, NY
(114 lines)
From:
Andrews, Kim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:03:34 -0400
Rim Drive Reel to Reel Re: [ARSCLIST] Audograph disc
Rim Drive Reel to Reel Re: [ARSCLIST] Audograph disc
(86 lines)
From:
Martin Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:45:10 -0500
San Francisco AV Media Preservation Program-Registration Deadline Approaching
San Francisco AV Media Preservation Program-Registration Deadline Approaching
(103 lines)
From:
Andrews, Kim <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:56:18 -0400
Sephardic music website
Sephardic music website
(56 lines)
From:
Joel Bresler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:30:21 -0400
sleeves and jackets
sleeves and jackets
(28 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:54:23 -0400
sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers
Re: sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers
(122 lines)
From:
Brandon Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:59:30 -0700
sleeves for 10 & 12" lacquers
(52 lines)
From:
Brandon Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:16:01 -0700
Software for Mac
Re: Software for Mac
(76 lines)
From:
Dave Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:01:57 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(99 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:00:27 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(51 lines)
From:
Dave Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:23:53 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(79 lines)
From:
carlstephen koto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:34:39 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(27 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(79 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:14:29 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(88 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:31:30 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(51 lines)
From:
Robert Cham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:09:41 -0500
Re: Software for Mac
(95 lines)
From:
Robert Cham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:51:41 -0500
Re: Software for Mac
(115 lines)
From:
Peter Alyea <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:16:43 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(70 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:35:13 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(79 lines)
From:
Craig Breaden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:47:45 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Alyea <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:53:27 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(165 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:17:06 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(27 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:35:07 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(192 lines)
From:
carlstephen koto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:32:34 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(26 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:35:41 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(33 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:32:41 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(127 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:30:25 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(51 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:25:17 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(25 lines)
From:
Matt Sohn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:53:09 -0500
Re: Software for Mac
(150 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:30:32 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(59 lines)
From:
Robert Cham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:27:22 -0500
Re: Software for Mac
(65 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:20:53 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(84 lines)
From:
Richard L. Hess <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:38:34 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(124 lines)
From:
Craig Breaden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:28:05 -0400
Re: Software for Mac
(117 lines)
From:
Lou Judson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:13:39 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(35 lines)
From:
Dave Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:43:57 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(71 lines)
From:
Malcolm Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:51:39 -0700
Re: Software for Mac
(58 lines)
From:
WIlliam McQuay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:58:00 -0400
Software for Mac
(37 lines)
From:
Craig Breaden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:47:56 -0400
Software for Mac/speed change
Re: Software for Mac/speed change
(122 lines)
From:
Dan Nelson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:55:41 -0700
Sound card confusion
Re: Sound card confusion
(55 lines)
From:
Dale Francis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:26:10 -0400
Re: Sound card confusion
(38 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:12:59 -0700
Sound card confusion
(39 lines)
From:
Fliss, William <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:21:55 -0500
Still seeking two articles
Still seeking two articles
(26 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:29:31 -0400
This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
Re: This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
(30 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:50:12 -0500
Re: This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
(27 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:49:27 -0500
This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
(22 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:11:58 -0400
This article on Taft-Bryan cylinders also has audio, great graphics, and features Patrick Feaster
(51 lines)
From:
Ron Cowen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:09:36 -0400
transporting wax cylinders
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(23 lines)
From:
Jerry Fabris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:27:43 -0400
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(38 lines)
From:
D P Ingram <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:58:04 +0300
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(34 lines)
From:
Alex Hartov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:49:55 -0400
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(14 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:42:31 -0400
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(32 lines)
From:
Mike Richter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:07:12 -0700
Re: transporting wax cylinders
(16 lines)
From:
Jerry Fabris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:29:13 -0400
transporting wax cylinders
(53 lines)
From:
Mike Hirst <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:53:02 +0100
Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
(29 lines)
From:
Michael Biel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:19:57 -0700
Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
(59 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:12:17 -0400
Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
(31 lines)
From:
Steve Ramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:33:42 EDT
Re: Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
(18 lines)
From:
Howard Friedman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:44:21 -0400
Two articles in today's Wall St. Journal worth Reading
(40 lines)
From:
Steve Ramm <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:09:35 EDT
World Day for Audiovisual Heritage
World Day for Audiovisual Heritage
(30 lines)
From:
David Seubert <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:41:14 -0700
Yet another Everest reissue
Yet another Everest reissue
(22 lines)
From:
Tom Fine <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:32:16 -0400
Back to the main ARSCLIST page
LISTSERV.LOC.GOV