Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:42:00 +0100
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: 78 prices
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad Roger Kulp wrote > ...........................................,I came across this site,which sells > mostly operatic records of the acoustic era. > > http://www.rare78s.com/browse_mark3.php > > Prices are in Pounds,and represent the high end of what the stuff can go for > on eBay in a good day.£1.00=$1.95.The only thing like this I sold recently > was some vg+ New York-Milano Fonotipa that went for fifty bucks.Prepare to > be shocked,if you don't think this stuff can bring much money. > ----- I am most shocked by the way the records are priced. The interesting items are invariably given very low prices - and obviously already sold (_mark2.php is a different page that gives "in stock" and "sold"). It is sad, with the love and effort that has obviously gone into the making of this list. But if you cannot read Gothic and get "Aeolian Noration" out of "Aeolian Vocalion" and insist on using the HMV Singe-Sided numbers and call them catalogue numbers, we must wonder what generation after generation of collectors have contributed to today's market. This looks as if Nathan has started from scratch. The color rendition of in particular the reds (and mauve) is not correct. Kind regards, George


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager