Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:21:35 -0800
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard
              their holdings.
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <001801c73051$b08949a0$6a01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote: All this culling at libraries is a screaming endorsement of Google's plot to digitize as many printed words as possible and make it all searchable. Yeah, they're going to have to make their money back and yeah there are copyright issues. But 100 years down the line, people might be very thankful that their digitizing engine was running full throttle as printed books got dumpstered. -- Tom Fine I agree. Much of what is archived is that which was collected by individuals and organizations other than libraries. I have often wondered if we were left with what libraries retain...our measure of our history would be Harry Potter and no Hemingway...lots of Britney Spears and no Coltrane. Well, come to think about it, Britney probably says more about our society than Coltrane. Karl


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager