Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sat, 20 Jan 2007 00:43:02 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Peter Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Soundcard/iTunes phollies
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <002d01c73c25$535b0900$6b01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Tom, I stayed with WAVs because I figured that since HDs were inexpensive enough I would insure against the need to transcode in the future if any given lossless codec stopped being supported (I think that FLAC or others "only" reduce to roughly 1/2 the size of a WAV anyway). I did try ripping and compressing using EAC, just for kicks, and it seemed to work OK. For the WAVs I had to figure out a filenaming system that preserved the track information, since WAVs don't have tags (as far as I know), and my library software made it easy to parse the names to make "tags" for its use. If I was encoding, I might rip first and then just let my library software (I use J River Media Center, it's also pretty versatile) batch encode, since I think doing it at the ripping stage would create a logjam. The server approach has really improved my access to and use of the music I have, but it really did make me think more about what kind of support will remain for all of the various formats as time goes on (let alone if I'll be able to view my JPGs, RAW Files, read my PDFs and DOCs...). Peter Rothstein -----Original Message----- From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:56 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Soundcard/iTunes phollies Hi Peter: I think we have many fellow fans of EAC here, but did you use it to extract WAV or to extract and then reduce to MP3 using attached LAME encoding? For WAV extraction, I don't think it's easy to beat EAC (and you really can't beat the price). I've long thought about doing what you did -- extracting all my CD audio into hard drives -- but the places I listen to music in my house (studio, media room next to studio, workshop next to media room and living room upstairs) are all interconnected with balanced audio lines and all have reasonably good CD players. So I don't really have a need to go through the effort. Now that I have a new generation iPod, I might stop ripping into my pod library as MP3 (192CBR) and switch to Apple Lossless Format or WAV. I haven't decided that yet. -- Tom Fine


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager