Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:38:36 +0000
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard
              their holdings.
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <000e01c72f4a$e4969e30$5892a245@DELLDOWNSTAIRS>
Content-Type: text/plain

On 03/01/07, Steven Smolian wrote: > There are circulating libraries and research libraries. They perform > different functions. > True, but even a circulating library ought to keep the main classics in stock. There are always new readers coming along, who haven't read any Hemingway yet. (Or Dickens, or Jane Austen, or Mark Twain....) Two years is a very short cut off period. Ten or fifteen would be more sensible. Otherwise the library is just competing with the local bookstore, and may well drive it out of business. Regards -- Don Cox [log in to unmask]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager