Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:46:39 -0800
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         John Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Audio compression on radio,
              was Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

>Well, back in my youth of AM mono car radios, they tinkered with speed >rather than volume...the whole idea was to play records 5% or so fast, >leaving more time for (profitable) commercials... Extra time wasn't the issue -- they could have accomplished the same thing by playing one less record per hour. But when a station increased the speed, it also sped up the tempo, which meant that the same record on the competing station would sound slower. The program directors hoped that their listeners would think "everything sounds better on KLUNK than it does on KRUD." John Ross


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager