Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:08:09 -0600
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

A square wave on a record doesn't look like a square because of the velocity involved--or something--that I can't explain. A square wave is built up of stacked "odd integer harmonics" and contains multiple harmonics. Somewhere around 12 harmonics, it really looks like a square wave. The more harmonics present, the more perfectly formed the square wave becomes. A perfect square wave would require infinite bandwidth and infinitely fast electronics (forget the stylus, we can't even generate a perfect square wave, only a mathematical representation of one). What it looks like on record is fundamentally different from what a scope shows. There's no co correlation. Somewhere I have an email from Stan Ricker about it. If I can find it, I'll send it along. Phillip Mike Richter wrote: > Steven C. Barr(x) wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Phillips" >> <[log in to unmask]> >>> Use sound forge or similar and look at a remastered LP at the least, or >>> a current recording... The results are a LOT of square waves<snip> >>> >> Would it be possible/practical to record a signal containing "square >> waves" (or approximately such)? Can an analog stylus make such an >> abrupt right/left turn? > > Yes on both counts - but with caveats. > > 1. The signal will not be captured perfectly. One needs to define how > accurate a capture qualifies as success. > > 2. The higher the frequency, the lower the accuracy of capture. The > higher the amplitude, the more likely that artifacts will be detected. > > 3. The detector (stylus, cartridge and preamp) are sources of > imprecision in matching input to output. > > NOTE: Ringing can be eliminated by rolling off the highs - another > source of inaccuracy. > > Mike


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager