Date:Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:08:09 -0600
Reply-To:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
From:phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:square waves....Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
Comments:To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:<[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
A square wave on a record doesn't look like a square because of the
velocity involved--or something--that I can't explain. A square wave is
built up of stacked "odd integer harmonics" and contains multiple
harmonics. Somewhere around 12 harmonics, it really looks like a square
wave. The more harmonics present, the more perfectly formed the square
wave becomes. A perfect square wave would require infinite bandwidth
and infinitely fast electronics (forget the stylus, we can't even
generate a perfect square wave, only a mathematical representation of
one). What it looks like on record is fundamentally different from what
a scope shows. There's no co correlation. Somewhere I have an email
from Stan Ricker about it. If I can find it, I'll send it along.
Phillip
Mike Richter wrote:
> Steven C. Barr(x) wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Phillips"
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Use sound forge or similar and look at a remastered LP at the least, or
>>> a current recording... The results are a LOT of square waves<snip>
>>>
>> Would it be possible/practical to record a signal containing "square
>> waves" (or approximately such)? Can an analog stylus make such an
>> abrupt right/left turn?
>
> Yes on both counts - but with caveats.
>
> 1. The signal will not be captured perfectly. One needs to define how
> accurate a capture qualifies as success.
>
> 2. The higher the frequency, the lower the accuracy of capture. The
> higher the amplitude, the more likely that artifacts will be detected.
>
> 3. The detector (stylus, cartridge and preamp) are sources of
> imprecision in matching input to output.
>
> NOTE: Ringing can be eliminated by rolling off the highs - another
> source of inaccuracy.
>
> Mike