Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:59:09 -0600
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         phillip holmes <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard
              their holdings.
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <001e01c731ba$4cb1d770$6a01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Yes, and the intellectual types would probably get turned into dinner by the bigger stronger moron types (cooked over piles of useless books and records). However, in a nuclear attack, virtually all non-hardened electronic devices will be rendered useless by EMP. EMP can knock out computers, and such, hundreds of miles away (far out of range of blast/heat). One of the various first strike scenarios has been to detonate nukes in the upper atmosphere, knocking out communications/command/control ,on ground and in the atmosphere, of the enemy, blinding them. Looks like we're going that direction--total annihilation. However, until that fateful day, there should be a digital version (prevents wear/tear) and a preserved original specimen. Phillip Tom Fine wrote: > Don, this makes no sense. An occurance that would decimate every copy > of every digital data would definitely destroy all other matter, too. > Books and records burn faster than computers, last I checked. > > -- Tom Fine > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cox" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:56 AM > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries > should discard their holdings. > > >> On 05/01/07, Tom Fine wrote: >>> Sorry but this is an uninformed statement. A company like Google or >>> any other halfway responsible for-profit entity has servers mirrored >>> and backed up nine ways to Sunday, including information spread all >>> over the globe in redundant locations. Likely, the data will live on >>> beyond the printed originals barring a nuclear holocaust, in which >>> case it really doesn't matter. >> >> On the contrary, that is when it matters most. Think of the importance >> of the few (in some cases one only) copies of Greek and Roman books for >> the recovery of European civilisation after the Dark Ages. >> >> Hard copy books and 78 rpm records are more likely to survive in a >> useful state than digital data. >> >> Regards >> -- >> Don Cox >> [log in to unmask] >> > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager