Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:19:19 +0000
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Don Cox <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: "hard drive on a shelf"
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain

On 23/07/07, Steven C. Barr(x) wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Cox" <[log in to unmask]> >> >> I think the most likely thing to fail on a hard drive long term is >> >> capacitors on the circuit board. >> >> >> >> But more likely is that, when the drive is brought out of its >> >> cupboard >> >> 25 years later, there will be no equipment to connect it to and no >> >> operating system that can read the file format. Try getting data >> >> off a >> >> 25 year old cp/m drive today. >> >> > 1) Modern-day capacitors do not have anywhere near the failure rate as > do those we recall...especially if/when the devices in which they are > included are not in use! IIRC (and I may be wrong here...?) current > electrolytic units no longer allow evaporation of liquid electrolytes, > but are as sealed as are other capacitors. Further, the concept of > caps "sealed" with a wax coating is long since obsolete...! > > 2) Although programs, and their inherent file formats, have come and > gone over the years/decades...the basic format of information > expressed in byte and/or bit form still remains functionally the same! > I may have to search high and low for a 5.25" floppy drive (back when > they were REALLY "floppy," eh...?!)...but once I find and install one, > the ASCII content will be as readable today as it was back in 1986 > when I stored it...! Only if you have a DOS that knows how the blocks are arranged on the disk. Otherwise, you have a large collection of snippets of files in semi-random order. I have experience of trying to recover data from cp/m disks with damaged directories. There are dozens of possible arrangements for the sectors on cp/m disks. Nowadays, there are many different filesystems in use, most much more complex than those used 25 years ago. (FAT, widely used in memory sticks, cameras, etc is basically a cp/m variant, and is the most primitive system still in general use.) > Yes...program- specific files CAN be unreadable > without a working copy of <wotever>.exe, but in many cases (dBASE and > most vintage word-processing applications, et al...) the data can > still be recovered from the file contents. Image and audio files are difficult, especially if they are compressed (as most image files are). > Further, given the inherent > restriction that each new generation of digitalia MUST be able to use > files created using the previous generation (otherwise gazillions of > machines and digital files are instantly rendered useless...!), it > seems unlikely that some 21st-century improvement in computer > technology will wipe out everything...including vast amounts of stored > information...that went before! > > The CP/M example you cite actually refers to the VERY beginning of > personal computers and computation...and was a format which existed > for no more than a handful of years (although we inherited its 8.3 > filename format...!). As well, didn't it also use the same ASCII > format for alphanumeric information? > > Certainly, the bytes making up a program file would probably be > totally unintelligible to a modern Wintel machine...just as are/were > the bytes making up a Mac program. In fact, I'm not sure if it would > be possible to create an application which could translate non-Wintel > programmatic data into its Wintel equivalent (interesting thought, > though...?!). > > So...saved alphanumeric data will probably posess near-infinite > readability. Digital sound files may or may not (although the question > arises what sorts of new and different format will replace the CD > and/or DVD without leaving a trace of its predecessors...?!) > And...digital image files are even more likely to be struck "obsolete" > in one fell swoop, since their digital content is NOT easily > interpretable with respect to the pixels involved (again, I may be in > error...?!). > > However...on the first floor I have an IBM PS-1 machine, with an > Intel 486SX processor, c. 1991! It works fine...as do the various > programs stored on its hard drive. Further, it is likely to continue > "working fine" until either lightning strikes the hydro wires in > my neighbourhood, or my house unexpectedly bursts into flames, or > either Al Qaeda or Chairman Putin (or the current government of > the Maldive Islands...or Hell's Angels...or the Sopranos...or...) > organizes the nuclear/biological/chemical/wotever destruction of > Durham Region and Vicinity... > > However...in a new interpretation of "Note the notes"...in any such > crisis it is very likely that all my hand-taken, ink-on-paper "notes" > would be reduced to illegible ash in a literal "flash"...?! > > Steven C. Barr Regards -- Don Cox [log in to unmask]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager