Date:Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:49:39 -0400
Reply-To:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
From:David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Enough Already Re: [ARSCLIST] Urgent Message From SaveNetRadio
Comments:To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Folks..this IS an interesting topic when it leads to copyright issues and
licensing as related to CD issuing, transfers and archiving, but I for one have
bloody had it with the personal stuff. Please take it outside and please take
it outside NOW.
And yes I know I have a delete button. Used it many times, possibly missed some
pertinent stuff because of the overkill of the I'm Right You're a Moron dialog.
dl
Dismuke wrote:
> --- Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> What I'm saying is that you are mistaken. You are
>> confusing two different kinds of royalties. You are
>> also very confused about the relationships between
>> artists, labels, the RIAA, the CRB and
>> SoundExchange. Furthermore you are very confused
>> about the various kinds of relationships that exist
>> between artists and both independent and major
>> record labels.
>>
>
>
> I am afraid that the above statement is nothing more
> than a series of empty assertions that you do not even
> attempt to substantiate with examples or evidence. If
> you wish for the above to be taken seriously or to
> even have any objective meaning at all, you will back
> up your statements with either evidence or specific
> examples of that which you are talking about.
>