Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:48:51 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Urgent Message From SaveNetRadio
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <000601c7c594$b7a27ee0$6a01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

-----Original Message----- From Tom Fine: "... So there is a great monetary incentive for an artist not to price themselves out of the market -- loss of royalties on the one hand and perhaps more importantly loss of free promotion/audience-widening on the other..." Not only an incentive but two different mechanisms for artists and webcasters to achieve what each wants: First off, the CRB rates are a mandatory cap and NOT a fixed rate that anybody who is willing to negotiate has to pay. Webcasters who can prove they can't afford that much won't have to pay it unless the members of SoundExchange turn suicidal which seems highly unlikely. There is already a two-tier rate being offered to assist small webcasters. ("SoundExchange is a nonprofit performance rights organization jointly controlled by artists and sound recording copyright owners through an 18-member board of directors with nine artist representatives and nine copyright owner representatives. We have been designated by the U.S. Copyright Office to collect and distribute statutory royalties to sound recording copyright owners and featured and nonfeatured artists. Our board members and staff are dedicated to providing exceptional service and advocacy for artists and copyright owners to ensure the fair compensation for the use of copyrighted sound recordings.") Second, every webcaster and every artist is perfectly free to make their own deal. The statutory royalty cap ONLY comes into play when a webcaster refuses to make an individual deal with an artist or their representative such as their label or SoundExchange. This whole issue has been seriously mischaracterized by the Digital Media Association's PR campaign in an attempt to undermine the artist's negotiating position. The Digital Media Association refused to negotiate beginning several years ago forcing the CRB process and then continued to stonewall SoundExchange until a few weeks ago when it became apparent that Congress wasn't about to give them the lower royalty cap their lobbyists were asking for. This royalty cap affects a webcaster's upside potential profit which in turn affects a webcaster's stock or IPO value. Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined! 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager