Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:31:19 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: LP pressing question
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <001301c7bcc6$e316b090$6901a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

-----Original Message----- From Tom Fine: "...Why do most test pressings that I've heard sound better than a bought-in-store version of the LP? Did the plants do something special for the test pressing..." Somebody needed to sign off on every test pressing before commencing manufacturing so the replicators had a huge incentive to make sure they were really good. My experience has been that the very best pressings were the major label DJ copies. These were often better than test pressings due to an even higher grade of vinyl. The first manufacturing run was generally comparable to the test pressing however reorder runs were frequently done as quickly and cheaply as possible. Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined! 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager